(My initial random selection: Rules 1742, 2184, 1950, 1727, 2196)
(I'd include 2196, but I can only select one to three proposals.)
Bayes submits the following proposal, titled Repeal 'Contracts' (AI=2, II=0):
{
Repeal Rule 1742 (Contracts).
}
Bayes submits the following proposal, titled
The PNP withdraws one 8 crop from the PBA for ^12.
The PNP withdraws one 4 crop from the PBA for ^9.
Using a Division Mill, the PNP mills 8 / 4 = 2.
The PNP deposits one 2 crop into the PBA to gain ^38.
The PNP withdraws one 4 crop from the PBA for ^10.
The PNP withdraws one 8 crop from the PBA
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 11:03 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
Appeal 2303a
Panelist: Goethe
Panelist: ais523
Panelist:
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:14 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
I vote as follows:
6027 D 1 2.0 Elysion none
FOR; this is not quite the same as the situation regarding 5707, as that
was about intents to affect things that didn't exist, so a
This message serves to make votes on behalf of the PerlNomic
Partnership (a public contract).
The PerlNomic Partnership votes as follows. Each vote is made a
number of times equal to the maximum number of valid votes that
the PerlNomic Partnership can make on an ordinary decision on each
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 21:17 -0500, Joshua Boehme wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:29:09 -0800
Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Billy Pilgrim wrote:
I vote to lynch avpx. That werewolf
That's one. With 13 townspersons, we need 7 votes to lynch someone.
Works for me.
Having received the necessary supoprt, I send the message indicated
below on behalf of the panel indicated below. -Goethe
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 11:03 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
Appeal
Sorry about the late announcement of the results for last week's Enigma,
I've been offline for a while.
There were no correct answers submitted to last week's Enigma puzzle;
therefore, no points are awarded. (Pavitra: feel free to publish the
solution to your puzzle, or alternatively to keep it
I submit the following proposal (AI=2, II=0, coauthor=Wooble,
Title=Contest NoVs correctly):
{{{
Replace A valid Notice of Violation is initially Uncontested if a Crime
is named, Contested otherwise. with A valid Notice of Violation is
initially Uncontested unless a Crime is named, Contested
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Joshua Boehme boehm...@msu.edu wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:29:09 -0800
Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Billy Pilgrim wrote:
I vote to lynch avpx. That werewolf
That's one. With 13 townspersons, we need 7 votes to lynch someone.
Works
I go on hold.
-root (gone on hold)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
I go on hold.
I nominate myself for Conductor.
2008/12/16, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Charles wrote:
I transfer 1 prop to Murphy for his Heroic effort updating the office of
Notary.
Unsuccessful, source not specified.
I transfer one prop FROM MYSELF to Murphy.
--
Charles Schaefer
2008/12/18, comex com...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Charles Schaefer
chuckles11...@gmail.com wrote:
Unsuccessful, source not specified.
I transfer one prop FROM MYSELF to Murphy.
Fails, reason not specified. :D
Really? It was in the quoted message. Just in case:
I
On 18 Dec 2008, at 22:30, Ed Murphy wrote:
ehird, want to withdraw your objection to these, so that H. Notary
Charles might complete the procedures?
I also recommend the following for termination:
needed_support--
copy of needed_support--
Looping
but not Z House, which can still be used
2008/12/18, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
On 18 Dec 2008, at 18:43, Ed Murphy wrote:
Billy Pilgrim, Elysion, comex, ais523, and Sgeo are voting to lynch
avpx (5 out of the needed 7). No one else is voting to lynch anyone.
I vote for avpx.
I cast the deciding vote to
2008/12/18, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Charles wrote:
I cast the deciding vote to lynch avpx.
avpx is lynched. Alas, e was a villager.
The night phase begins. Werewolves, pick a target. Seer, pick a
target. Witch, I'll get to you after the werewolves pick.
I pick comex.
--
2008/12/18, Charles Schaefer chuckles11...@gmail.com:
2008/12/18, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Charles wrote:
I cast the deciding vote to lynch avpx.
avpx is lynched. Alas, e was a villager.
The night phase begins. Werewolves, pick a target. Seer, pick a
target. Witch, I'll
On Dec 18, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
6017 D1 3.0 Elysion Resurrect Rule 2140
6014 6015 6016 6017
OscarMeyr3F F F
AI1.7 2 3 3
VI2.6+ 0.1+ *U*0.3+
F/A 16/6 1/8 7/0 1/4
Quorum9 8 8
6018 O 1 1.0 comex The AWJ's enough
3 x FOR
6019 O 1 1.0 Murphy Undo the scam already
3 x ENDORSE MURPHY
6020 D 1 2.0 Murphy Complex scoring
FOR
6021 D 1 3.0 Murphy Definition of definitions
FOR
6022 D 1 3.0
root, I inform you of the following case, and invite you to rebut the
argument for your guilt:
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2312
OscarMeyr wrote:
On Dec 18, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
6017 D1 3.0 Elysion Resurrect Rule 2140
6014 6015 6016 6017
OscarMeyr3F F F
AI1.7 2 3 3
VI2.6+ 0.1+ *U*0.3+
F/A 16/6 1/8 7/0 1/4
Quorum
= Criminal Case 2307 =
The PerlNomic Partnership violated Rule 2215 by announcing that
I {Warrigal} am a party to it in the quoted message.
The PNP log shows:
1.
I harvest 2231 (using XX31; recent rule) for a random land.
I PBA-withdraw a 0 crop.
I harvest 2310 (using X310; recent CFJ number) for 2 WRV.
I harvest 2311 (using X311; recent CFJ number) for 2 WRV.
-woggle
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 22:32 -0500, Warrigal wrote:
If a CFJ were called on X, it would be legal to judge FALSE on the
CFJ, where X is defined as the following string, followed by a
quotation mark, followed by the same string,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
= Criminal Case 2308 =
The PNP violated rule 1607 by distributing a retracted proposal.
Patently absurd. This is why those contracts are bad. Anyway. *sigh*
Upon adoption of this proposal:
* Peter Suber's title of Hero is upgraded to Grand Hero of Agora Nomic,
for creating the game of Nomic.
* Chuck Carroll's title of Hero is upgraded to Grand Hero of Agora
Nomic, for writing the initial ruleset of Agora, and serving as
Rulekeepor for eight
27 matches
Mail list logo
