coppro deputized for the Anarchist to deal emself cards from the deck
of change. This violated the SHALL NOT in R2259. I'm really not sure
if this should be called against coppro or allispaul.
NOV:
I publish an NOV against coppro for violating power=2 rule R2259 by
deputizing for the Anarchist to
Because I'm fairly certain my automated e-mail didn't make it to the
list again (still trying to find that bug): If I have not already I
enforce Deck of Change hand limits as indicated by the following log
entry:
Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:24 - Deck of Change hand limit discards: ais523 -
Committee,
NOTE: Actions taken in this message are on behalf of BobTHJ as permitted by
contract.
{
I create a Digit Ranch (0) and a WRV in the possession of Tiger
}
Reason: Requested subsidy
I vote as follows:
On 8/10/09 5:39 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6426 D 1 3.0 Tiger Contract Anarchy
AGAINST
6427 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ NOV ID Numbers
PRESENT
6428 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ Office Rewards/Penalties Revision v2
PRESENT
I mill 9 + 1 = X.
I mill 0 - 1 = X.
I mill 0 - 1 = X.
I mill 4 * 8 = X.
I mill 4 * 8 = X.
I mill 3 * 7 = X.
I mill 7 / 4 = X.
- woggle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I IBA Deposit one 6 crop, one 5 crop, one 7 crop, and one 8 crop.
I IBA Withdraw one WRV.
BobTHJ
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 20:15 +0100, ais523 wrote:
This week's puzzle is Diagrams, by Murphy:
No Enigma puzzles this week. Here are the results for last week:
I award 5 x-points to Taral, for the first correct answer.
I award 3 x-points to Tiger, for a subsequent correct answer.
I award 9
I wrote:
For each of the following changes, I intend to perform it
without objection as allowed by Rule 2221 (Cleanliness):
Rule 1030 (Precedence between Rules) s/squence/sequence/
Rule 2166 (Assets) s/transfered/transferred/
Rule 1006 (Offices) s/ADoP/IADoP/
Rule 2156 (Voting on
Roger Hicks wrote:
coppro deputized for the Anarchist to deal emself cards from the deck
of change. This violated the SHALL NOT in R2259. I'm really not sure
if this should be called against coppro or allispaul.
NOV:
I publish an NOV against coppro for violating power=2 rule R2259 by
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 16:14 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
I amend Security Clearance to read {This contract terminates.}
...and I hereby announce that it has terminated. (Insufficient parties
for a non-pledge, among other things.)
--
ais523
Notary
6426 D 1 3.0 Tiger Contract Anarchy
AGAINST
6427 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ NOV ID Numbers
AGAINST
6428 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ Office Rewards/Penalties Revision v2
FOR
6429 D 1 3.0 Murphy Also, Crete must be destroyed
PRESENT (specific general may be a better
6438 D 0 2.0 coppro Dealer Cleanup
PRESENT (s/POSSIBLE/POSSIBLE and LEGAL)
6439 D 0 2.0 coppro Deal Cleanup
PRESENT (s/entity/player/g)
6440 D 0 3.0 coppro Want not NEED NOT
AGAINST (exceeds intended scope of Janitor proposals)
I recuse Quazie from CFJs 2644 and 2655 and make em supine.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2644
== CFJ 2644 ==
The owner of a Local Election card CAN play it, causing it to be
destroyed.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:24, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Rule 1030 (Precedence between Rules) s/squence/sequence/
I harvest 1030 for 8 random crops.
Rule 1006 (Offices) s/ADoP/IADoP/
I harvest 1006 for 6 random crops
Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) s/of of/of/
I harvest 1504
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:24, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Rule 1030 (Precedence between Rules) s/squence/sequence/
I harvest 1030 for 8 random crops.
As do I.
-coppro
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 09:52, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2652
= Criminal Case 2652 =
coppro broke Rule 2253 (power-2) by creating the first in a set
of Local Election
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2233, replacing contract
up so long with contract so long, do not with does not, and
that was not in accordance with it's with that were not in
accordance with its
Having
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 06:39, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6426 D 1 3.0 Tiger Contract Anarchy
AGAINST
6427 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ NOV ID Numbers
FOR
6428 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ Office Rewards/Penalties Revision v2
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:31, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6438 D 0 2.0 coppro Dealer Cleanup
FOR
6439 D 0 2.0 coppro Deal Cleanup
PRESENT (I'm not sure this fixes the problem. Warrigal, G., and Darth
Cliche are all
NOTE: Actions taken in this message are on behalf of BobTHJ as permitted by
contract.
{
I create the following crops in BobTHJ's possession: 6, 0, 2, 0, 6, 9, 9, 2
}
Reason: Harvested amended rule 1030
{
I create the following crops in BobTHJ's possession: 0, X, 9, 0, 0, X
}
Reason: Harvested
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2655
== CFJ 2655 ==
I am owed a draw from the Government deck.
These didn't come through on the automated e-mail (though they did
give me a good clue as to where to look for this weird e-mail bug). If
I have not already I perform the actions indicated by the following
log entries:
Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:12 - coppro is dealt the following card from the
deck of
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 16:17, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2655
== CFJ 2655 ==
I am owed a draw from
I withdraw my proposal Hand Limit Remodel from the pool and submit
the following instead. I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable:
Hand Limit Remodel v3
AI: 3
II: 1
{
Append to the numbered list in R1728 (Dependent Actions), bullet item a):
{{
4) With Notice.
}}
and replace:
{{
(if the
I withdraw my proposal Banks from the pool and submit the following
instead, playing Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable:
Banks v2
AI: 2
II: 1
{
Create a new rule titled Banks (Power=2) with the text:
{{
A Bank is a public contract whose purpose includes facilitating a
means of asset
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:51 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2179 by replacing a
office with an office.
I do so.
--
-c.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Act, specifying the following action. The
eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the options are FOR,
AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am the vote collector. I vote FOR the
Motion to Act.
* action: The IBA
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 19:18, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
Quorum was 3. The result was ADOPTED. The IBA intends, with Agoran
Consent, to register.
I support.
Me too.
--
-c.
comex wrote:
Quorum was 3. The result was ADOPTED. The IBA intends, with Agoran
Consent, to register.
I support.
Pavitra
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Act, specifying the following action. The
eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the options are FOR,
AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am the vote
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to deregister Randy Olshaw due to inactivity.
Having received no objections, I deregister Randy Olshaw due to inactivity.
-Yally
On 8/16/09 12:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
[apologies for not announcing this earlier]
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2656
== CFJ 2656 ==
coppro's destruction of Wooble's Lobbyist and Debate-o-Matic
I harvest 2663, 2664, 2665 (recent CFJ numbers) for 6 WRV.
- woggle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
34 matches
Mail list logo
