Re: BUS: Fine Levying

It doesn't really matter, but I object to both of these. On 2017-11-06 18:46, VJ Rada wrote: I intend to levy a fine, with 2 support, on Alexis. E was issued a blue card, with 1 shiny going to Agora and the other to PSS I intend to levy a fine, with 2 support, on ATMunn. E was issued a blue

BUS: Fine Levying

I intend to levy a fine, with 2 support, on Alexis. E was issued a blue card, with 1 shiny going to Agora and the other to PSS I intend to levy a fine, with 2 support, on ATMunn. E was issued a blue card, with 1 shiny going to Agora and the other to PSS -- >From V.J. Rada

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Expedition] Distribution of a Proposal

I issue Alexis a blue card for failing to state quorum. Obviously I will issue em the same card I issed ATMunn. The fine is 2 shinies, one going to PSS and one to Agora. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I point my finger at Alexis for

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7962 (revision)

FOR on 7962. At this rate, it'll only be a couple of months and we'll get to 8000! On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > [I don't think I ever actually did this.] > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran >

BUS: Re: OFF: [Expedition] Distribution of a Proposal

I point my finger at Alexis for failing to state quorum, recommending a Blue Card, in the interest of consistency. I identify this proposal as proposal 7963. -Aris On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I submit, pend for an AP, and expedite by specially

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3589 assigned to Aris

Judgment: Clearly false, per CFJ 3587. The contract has been adjudged ineffective, so this CFJ is IRRELEVANT. --- -Aris On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:57 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Obviously this is frivolously false, as my contract at the time did nothing. > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at

BUS: Re: [Rulekeepor Candidate] Draft FLR

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 02:05 Alexis Hunt wrote: > I believe this message satisfies the conditions in my and G.'s votes > for rulekeepor. I transfer 5 shinies to G. for making me actually do > this! ATTN: PSS Just in case, I change my vote in the Rulekeepor election to an

Re: BUS: One pronoun fix

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 22:24 Reuben Staley wrote: > I submit the following proposal and pend it with AP: > > Title: "One pronoun fix" > Author: Trigon > AI: 3 > > Replace the word "his" in the second paragraph of Rule 2438 ("Ribbons") > with "eir". > I transfer 4 shinies

BUS: One pronoun fix

I submit the following proposal and pend it with AP: Title: "One pronoun fix" Author: Trigon AI: 3 Replace the word "his" in the second paragraph of Rule 2438 ("Ribbons") with "eir". -- Trigon

Re: BUS: Re: [Expedition] Distribution of a Proposal

I vote FOR for this proposal. As soon as I saw this I thought "wait can't someone scam Cyan through expediting whatever proposal" and then you immediately used it for Transparent! On 2017-11-06 14:11, Alexis Hunt wrote: On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 22:10 Alexis Hunt

Re: BUS: Re: [Expedition] Distribution of a Proposal

On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 03:11 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I award myself a Transparent Ribbon: I qualify for Cyan per the > above, > Green for Tailor, Indigo for my thesis, and Red and Orange for > Proposal > 7940. Somehow I'm amazingly impressed at someone getting Transparent off Indigo. We

Re: BUS: A different fear

I pledge that if I do not win the election for Rulekeepor, I will put myself up as a candidate for this election. On 11/5/2017 6:40 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: I initiate an election for Fearmongor. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com -- Trigon

BUS: Re: [Expedition] Distribution of a Proposal

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 22:10 Alexis Hunt wrote: > I submit, pend for an AP, and expedite by specially deputiising, per Rule > 2443, for Promotor distribute the following Proposal. This notice thus > initiates the Agoran decision to adopt the Proposal; the valid votes are > FOR,

BUS: Re: OFF: [Expedition] Distribution of a Proposal

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 22:10 Alexis Hunt wrote: > I submit, pend for an AP, and expedite by specially deputiising, per Rule > 2443, for Promotor distribute the following Proposal. This notice thus > initiates the Agoran decision to adopt the Proposal; the valid votes are > FOR,

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of 7931-7953

I vote: FOR 7948 AGAINST 7949 FOR 7950 FOR 7951 FOR 7952 FOR 7953. I also award myself an orange ribbon for proposal 7944. On 11/5/2017 7:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I issue a humiliating public reminder on proposals 7948 through 7953. On 10/30/2017

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of 7931-7953

I vote: 7948: FOR. 7949: AGAINST. 7950: FOR. 7951: FOR. 7952: FOR. 7953: FOR. On 11/5/2017 9:53 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: You did not. On 11/05/2017 09:48 PM, ATMunn wrote: I have no idea if I voted on these or not. On 11/5/2017 9:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

BUS: Poetry Duel Challenge Writ

I can't believe that proposal passed. Read what you're voting for, chaps. I challenge Telnaior to a poetry duel by issuing a Poetry Duel Challenge Writ. -- >From V.J. Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of 7931-7953

I vote PRESENT on 7953. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > You did not. > > On 11/05/2017 09:48 PM, ATMunn wrote: > > I have no idea if I voted on these or not. > > > > On 11/5/2017 9:45 PM, Publius Scribonius

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

Okay. I deny all of PSS's CoEs. On 11/5/2017 9:54 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: You do, but you should deny all of them. On 11/05/2017 09:50 PM, ATMunn wrote: Wait so... what's actually going on here? Do I need to respond to the CoEs or what? I'm very confused right now. Also,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of 7931-7953

I also extend the voting period on the decision to adopt proposals 7948 through 7953 by 7 days. You did not vote on 7953. On 11/05/2017 09:47 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > You'll need to also announce the extension of the voting period. > > I've voted on those, right? > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:45 PM,

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of 7931-7953

I have no idea if I voted on these or not. On 11/5/2017 9:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I issue a humiliating public reminder on proposals 7948 through 7953. On 10/30/2017 01:48 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: I accept Alexis' CoE with regard to the most recent proposal distribution.

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of 7931-7953

I issue a humiliating public reminder on proposals 7948 through 7953. On 10/30/2017 01:48 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I accept Alexis' CoE with regard to the most recent proposal distribution. > The following is a revision, effective immediately. > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal,

Re: BUS: Attempt to Call in a Pledge

I call in nichdel's pledge. I issue nichdel a yellow card. Being late on an obligation by a couple of days is not usually worth a yellow card, but a pledge imposes an obligation on oneself that the pledger must consider important. A pledge shows that the player who makes it cares about it, and

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

Oh, good point. Sorry about this mess. I believe ATMunn still violated SHALLs and therefore I point my finger at em for failure to state the quorum. On 11/05/2017 09:01 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > If no rule says it's an essential parameter, it isn't an essential > parameter. There's no reason to

BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Agronomist Election Agoran Decision Initiation and Campaign Proposal Distribution

CoE: The quorum is not specified for the first decision. On 10/30/2017 09:40 AM, ATMunn wrote: > Doing it correctly this time! > If you already voted on this, please vote again. > > As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to > select the winner of the Agronomist election.

BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Rulekeepor Election Agoran Decision Initiation

CoE: The quorum is not specified. On 10/30/2017 09:41 AM, ATMunn wrote: > Doing it correctly this time! > If you already voted, please vote again. > > > As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to > select the winner of the Rulekeepor election. > > For this decision, the

BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

CoE: The quorum is not specified for the first decision. On 11/01/2017 09:15 AM, ATMunn wrote: > On 10/31/2017 9:34 PM, VJ Rada wrote: >> Sorry Munn, neither the initiation of the election nor the >> distribution of the proposal worked. Rules say the following "the ADoP >> CAN and SHALL, _in the

BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

Sorry about this. CoE: Quorum was not specified on the first Agoran Decision, therefore neither decision was initiated. I wish I had noticed this earlier, but I was starting to count the votes and went to check quorum and saw that it was missing. Unfortunately, I think this means that you can

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

Oh, fair point then, hey. I change my vote to FOR succession planning. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > > Really hope succession planning does not pass. We just established a > really > > snazzy system for

BUS: A different fear

I initiate an election for Fearmongor.

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

I vote as follows: On 2017-11-06 08:24, Aris Merchant wrote: I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 6.0 and the valid options

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

I CoE my own most recent proposal pool. It was missing the proposal entitled "Medals of Honour Fix". -Aris On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, ATMunn wrote: > Oh, okay. I retract the most recent proposal entitled "Medals of Honour Fix" > > > On 11/5/2017 6:56 PM, Aris

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

Oh, okay. I retract the most recent proposal entitled "Medals of Honour Fix" On 11/5/2017 6:56 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: It went through [1]. I pay ATMunn 2 shinies, and apologize for the error. You should probably retract your new one. -Aris [1]

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

It went through [1]. I pay ATMunn 2 shinies, and apologize for the error. You should probably retract your new one. -Aris [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg30317.html On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, ATMunn wrote: > I just realized

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

I also pend the below with shinies (I think I may have already used both of my AP, but I'm not sure) On 11/5/2017 6:40 PM, ATMunn wrote: I just realized something... On October 30, I made a proposal to fix my Medals of Honour proposal. I was going to CoE this because it's not here but... I

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

I just realized something... On October 30, I made a proposal to fix my Medals of Honour proposal. I was going to CoE this because it's not here but... I tried to find the message, and found it, but apparently something happened AND IT'S NOT IN THE ONLINE MAIL ARCHIVES SO THAT MEANS NOBODY GOT

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

Actually, you know what, several people have made a good point: It's useful even without the Fearmongor. I change my vote on proposal 7957 (for the last time) to AGAINST. On 11/5/2017 5:05 PM, ATMunn wrote: I change my vote on proposal 7957 to the following: CONDITIONAL: If proposal 7961 has

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

I change my vote on proposal 7957 to the following: CONDITIONAL: If proposal 7961 has more FOR votes than AGAINST votes, then I vote FOR, otherwise AGAINST. On 11/5/2017 5:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: CONDITIONAL: If the proposal "Fear less" passes, then I

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

I vote: > 7957* G. 1.0 Random Irony G. OP [1] AGAINST. A useful definition for many things, not just Fear. > 7958* G. 2.0 Succession Planning G. OP [1] FOR. > 7959* Telnaior 3.0 Deregistration Fix

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

I vote as follows. >> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran >> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal >> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the >> quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is >>

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

Sorry, I change my vote on 7959 to AGAINST. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote as follows: > > On 11/05/2017 04:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > >

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

I vote as follows: On 11/05/2017 04:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > quorum is 6.0 and the valid

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

7597: AGAINST 7958: AGAINST 7959: FOR 7960: FOR 7961: FOR On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Reuben Staley wrote: > On 11/5/2017 2:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > >> ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend >> fee >>

Re: BUS: Sorry PSS :(

I change my emotion to Joyous. It's really no big deal Publius! Getting started on a new mechanic always has some bumps, and the Registrar Office, as the default switch-keeper, often gets a bunch of these things that aren't expected (*pat pat*). And you (and maybe others) learned something

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

On 11/5/2017 2:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend fee --- 7957* G. 1.0 Random Irony G. OP [1] AGAINST 7958* G.

BUS: Silly Parties

Silly Proposal: Backed Out the Door (AI=2, coauthors=Telnaior, ais523, Aris, G.) {{{ Enact a new power-2 rule entitled "Political Parties", reading as follows: There are 5 Parties, in order: - Platonic Isolationists - New Punchbowl Reformers - Costume Conservatives

Re: BUS: Sorry PSS :(

I change my emotion to melancholy because of how my mistakes have been causing others to feel. On 11/05/2017 02:19 PM, ATMunn wrote: > I change my emotion to Melancholy because of the troubles my Emotions > rule have caused for the Registrar. -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

BUS: Sorry PSS :(

I change my emotion to Melancholy because of the troubles my Emotions rule have caused for the Registrar.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 13:41 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I CoE that neither of my reports contained emotions and publish the > below errata as a revision to both of my two most recent Registrar's > reports: > > All players' emotions were in their

BUS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Agora Sky News vol 6

I apologize that this issue was almost late; I had planned on doing it earlier but real life got in the way. I claim a reward of 5 shinies for the quoted report. 天火狐 On 5 November 2017 at 12:49, Josh T wrote: >

Re: BUS: Draft: [Proposal] Auctions v3

Oops, didn't mean to send to a-b. If, in the below message, I submitted a proposal, I retract it. On 11/5/2017 12:24 PM, ATMunn wrote: We're on the way to more drafts than Contracts! Title: Auctions v3 Author: ATMunn Co-author(s): Aris, nichdel, G. AI: 2 In this draft, numbers enclosed in

BUS: Draft: [Proposal] Auctions v3

We're on the way to more drafts than Contracts! Title: Auctions v3 Author: ATMunn Co-author(s): Aris, nichdel, G. AI: 2 In this draft, numbers enclosed in square brackets (e.g. [1], [2], [3], etc.) indicate footnotes which are written at the bottom. These will not be in the final proposal.

Re: BUS: CFJ 3590 judged FALSE

Fair enough. I buy a Stamp, transferring 6 shinies to Agora to do so, for real this time. That original message was just an experiment, but I also want to buy a stamp. :P On 11/5/2017 1:43 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: On Nov 4, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

Denied, per 2514 Indifferent is the default, and no player held a different emotion, and I only need to report nondefault values. On 11/04/2017 06:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Also: CoE this report has no emotion switches. > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:06 AM, VJ Rada

BUS: Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Distribution

I retract "Community Chest Repeal" and create and pend with shinies the below. Title: Community Chest Repeal II AI: 2 Text: Repeal rule 2508, "Community Chest" Amend rules 2510 "Such is Karma" and 2511 "Karmic Balance" in numerical order by replacing any instances of the phrases "the Community