= Criminal Case 2103
=
I violated Rule 2149 by claiming that I lie when I did not, in
fact lie.
==
==
Caller: Sgeo
I'll have to d
On Aug 3, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I recuse OscarMeyr from CFJ 2053. I make OscarMeyr supine.
Oops, I thought I had taken care of that one. Oh well, I could use a
small break anyway.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend on behalf of the panel to submit a judgment of REMAND with
>> instructions for the jduge to consider Quazie and Zefram's recent
>> arguments.
>
>
Ed Murphy wrote:
> If you have a record of voting to lynch Pavitra, then
>please re-send it and I'll announce corrected results.
|Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:02:13 +0100
|From: Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Werewolves update
Water rights enforcement will be coming shortly.
BobTHJ
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I CFJ on the following two linked cases:
> 1. The Speaker CAN assign prerogatives for August 2008.
> 2. The Speaker CAN assign prerogatives for September 2008.
I dare H. CotC Murphy to not assign these cases in a linked
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> The real question is if we can successfully prosecute either pikhq or
> BobTHJ for not assigning prerogatives; each of them has a fairly good
> case for UNAWARE (although obviously BobTHJ's is a bit stronger, since
> as far as anyone can tell e didn't kn
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Reason: I believe that we came to think (via CFJ, or just discussion?)
>> if R2019 "in a timely fashion SHALL" expires before the beginning of a
>> month, the Speaker loses the a
The real question is if we can successfully prosecute either pikhq or
BobTHJ for not assigning prerogatives; each of them has a fairly good
case for UNAWARE (although obviously BobTHJ's is a bit stronger, since
as far as anyone can tell e didn't know e was Speaker until after e
wasn't anymore).
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, comex wrote:
>> Reason: I believe that we came to think (via CFJ, or just discussion?)
>> if R2019 "in a timely fashion SHALL" expires before the beginning of a
>> month, the Speaker loses the ability to assign prerogatives (and thus
>> none are assigned nor can be assigned for
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reason: I believe that we came to think (via CFJ, or just discussion?)
> if R2019 "in a timely fashion SHALL" expires before the beginning of a
> month, the Speaker loses the ability to assign prerogatives
It was by discussi
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Possibly big question: if a player fails to do something that the rules
> authorize em (with a SHALL) to do within a time limit, is e permitted
> to do it late, or does eir authorization expire?
>
> Agoran custom is that the
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Pikhq wrote:
> Hmm. Can I still assign prerogatives? If so, I'll be doing that later
> this evening. (took me a couple of days to realise that I had been
> made Speaker; sorry about that)
I just asked you guys that. Anyway, for those not keeping up:
Eligible MwoPs:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BobTHJ, we thank you for your fine work during your ~20-hour tenure.
>
It has been my pleasure to serve Agora :)
BobTHJ
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, ais523 wrote:
> I intend to deputise for the Speaker to assign Prerogatives for August.
You probably have to unambiguously describe to whom you shall assign.
CONTRADICTION/PHILOSOPHICAL ALERT: is it even possible to unambiguously
describe a random action in advance?
(asid
Hmm. Can I still assign prerogatives? If so, I'll be doing that later
this evening. (took me a couple of days to realise that I had been
made Speaker; sorry about that)
On 8/4/08, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:24:10 -0700
> Proposal 5593 made BobTHJ the Speake
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/8/4 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill,
>> Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill.
>>
>> (cf. CFJ 2081).
>
>
> Case was appealed.
I know.
Possibly big question: if a player fails to do something that the rules
authorize em (with a SHALL) to do within a time limit, is e permitted
to do it late, or does eir authorization expire?
Agoran custom is that the authorization continues, but Rules don't say
(or did I miss them). Maybe R2
2008/8/4 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill,
> Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill.
>
> (cf. CFJ 2081).
Case was appealed.
Zefram wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> tusho and Zefram: (random) don't lynch, don't lynch
>
> Huh, what? I voted to lynch!
You voted to lynch Wooble on June 21, and seconded Pavitra's nomination
on June 30. My records don't contain any Werewolf-related messages from
you since then. If you have
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> With 2 support, I intend to initiate a criminal case against ihope for
> violating rule 1742.
Please read newly-adopted proposal 5640. -Goethe
>n
You are in the Discussion Forum. Michael "Maud" Slone is here. E
seems to be posting something.
>Attack Elder Lurker
What do you want to attack the Elder Lurker with? Your razor-sharp
wit or your irrefutable logic?
>wit
You don't have any razor-sharp wit.
>irrefutable logic.
Michael
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 08:08 -0700, Dice server wrote:
> # rules in the obvious manner. ais523 pledges that if e has counted
> # correctly, e will use the selected rule as the randomly selected rule
> # for purposes of paragraph a) of rule 2192.
>
> No. of sides on every die:119
> No. of dice f
2008/8/4 ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> CoE: I didn't call this, I think it was comex who did.
> --
> ais523
>
ihope.
24 matches
Mail list logo
