On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Taral wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
intent was too overloaded, but advanced isn't in the ruleset (yet) :).
... it's advance notice, isn't it?
For others, sure. But we're ahead of the curve.
Taral wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
comex recused: 27 Feb 2009 15:22:49 GMT
Assigned to ehird: 27 Feb 2009 15:22:49 GMT
I'm not going to CoE this, but please, Murphy, make it show case
Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
gains Speakership.
Sgeo wrote:
comex Wins by Junta. I award the Patent Title of Champion to comex. I
award the Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio to comex. The
Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio is revoked from ais523.
Pavitra is the new speaker.
Why didn't Pavitra have the Speakership anyway?
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
comex Wins by Junta. I award the Patent Title of Champion to comex. I
award the Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio to comex. The
Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio is revoked from ais523.
Sgeo wrote:
Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
gains Speakership.
I'm not sure about the exact order of loss, but in any case, there
should be only five MwPs. I have the most recent winners as
Sgeo wrote:
Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
gains Speakership.
Actually, I think your awards were correct, while the revocations
platonically occurred due to Rule 1922 (causing Rule 649 to
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
gains Speakership.
Nevermind, forgot about Murphy's win.
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 14:21 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
gains Speakership.
Actually, I think your awards were correct, while the revocations
2009/2/28 Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com:
I nominate myself for Herald.
If Agora truly feels that I would be the best Herald, vote for me.
Otherwise, someone else should take it, as it's not as fun as I
thought it would be.
One last time, everybody...
*ahem*
Is Sgeo still the herald?
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I'm not sure about the exact order of loss, but in any case, there
should be only five MwPs. I have the most recent winners as follows:
02/27/09 comex
02/05/09 Murphy
02/03/09 ais523, AFO
12/03/08 Pavitra
10/31/08
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Removing Unqualified Senators (AI = 2, II = 1) {
Amend rule 2177 (The Senate) by adding the following text as a separate
paragraph to the end of the rule:
Any Senator can declare a Senator not a Senator
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Proposal: Removing Unqualified Senators (AI = 2, II = 1) {
Amend rule 2177 (The Senate) by adding the following text as a separate
paragraph to
great!
On 2009-03-01, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Without objection, I make Billy Pilgrim inactive.
Without objection, I make j inactive.
Without objection, I make cmealerjr inactive.
The AFO goes on hold.
I spend C Eb G to reduce OscarMeyr's caste to Savage.
I spend C Eb G to
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I spend C D# G to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
Note that when e won by Clout, eir caste was flipped to its default
value. So this flips em to Savage...
I spend C D# G to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
I spend F# A C# to
How dare he win?
On 2009-03-01, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I spend C D# G to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
I spend C D# G to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
I spend F# A C# to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
I spend F# A C# to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
I spend F# A C# to reduce
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
How dare he win?
Oh I'm not annoyed; 'twas a good win. I just temporarily forgot about
the reset and was worried about the voting balance. Sorry 'bout that,
after the monthly Poobah adjustments I'll give em a bump back up. -G.
On 2009-03-01, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
How dare he win?
Oh I'm not annoyed; 'twas a good win. I just temporarily forgot about
the reset and was worried about the voting balance. Sorry 'bout that,
after the monthly Poobah
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 2009-03-01, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
How dare he win?
Oh I'm not annoyed; 'twas a good win. I just temporarily forgot about
the reset and was worried about the voting balance. Sorry 'bout
Wouldn't the following fail:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Without objection, I make Billy Pilgrim inactive.
Without objection, I make j inactive.
Without objection, I make cmealerjr inactive.
because rule 1728 requires:{
A person (the initiator)
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Dvorak Herring
dvorak.herr...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't the following fail:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Without objection, I make Billy Pilgrim inactive.
Without objection, I make j inactive.
Without objection, I make
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Without objection, I clean rule 2177 by replacing all instances of the word
'senator' with the word 'Senator' and all instances of the word 'senators'
with the word 'Senators'.
I know you intended to write I intend
ais523 wrote:
I spend D F# A to increase Murphy's caste to Alpha.
OMG you suck.
comex wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Dvorak Herring
dvorak.herr...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't the following fail:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Without objection, I make Billy Pilgrim inactive.
Without objection, I make j inactive.
Without
24 matches
Mail list logo
