arrr
-coppro
I hope things are working now
sorry for spamming.
-coppro
On 08/23/2010 02:31 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
sorry for spamming.
-coppro
yep. I ain't done yet :( getting this to work is annoyinger than I thought.
-coppro
On 08/23/2010 02:35 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 08/23/2010 02:31 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
sorry for spamming.
-coppro
yep. I ain't done yet :( getting this to work is annoyinger than I thought.
-coppro
Okay, last go for now. I promise this will end, whether it works or not.
Hopefully using the
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
arrr
-coppro
Sept 19th is weeks away.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 19:24, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Proposal A Perpepuum mobile is possible (AI=2, II=2, distributable via
fee)
{{{
Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled Perpepuum mobile:
The Perpepuum
Dangerousness is silly. Perhaps just say that higher-powered rules
can do more stuff to the game state?
Also, Title is annotated in places where it shouldn't be; e.g.
Title of Rule.
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
http://agora.qoid.us/current_flr.html?annotate=1
Probably broken on IE and/or in general.
Seems to work on the Firefox on this computer.
This should probably be made the default, if and when it's fully tested.
--
ais523
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I hope things are working now
I conclude on general principles that you're planning a timing scam, and am
wondering what it is.
--
ais523
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Alex Smith wrote:
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
http://agora.qoid.us/current_flr.html?annotate=1
Ambiguous annotations found so far:
class (crime, type of asset; first-class second-class)
title (multiple uses)
legal (e.g. first sentence R649)
basis
On 08/23/2010 12:38 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, Sean Huntscsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I hope things are working now
I conclude on general principles that you're planning a timing scam, and am
wondering what it is.
I was testing email filters, actually. It's the first
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED that no interpretation of Agoran law or
binding agreement may substantially limit or remove a natural
person's rights as defined by this Rule, except through the
explicit
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this.
Enough ergs to discuss something?
Well, it was labelled distributable via fee.
... and the
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so
that
rights apply to natural persons only. This is probably a
Oh my god, the mail looks terrible, I'm sorry. Switched to an email
client, should be better in the future ;)
--
Keba
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so
that
rights
On 08/23/2010 05:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
come up before for other non-natural
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I change my nickname to 'The Robot'.
-coppro
I publish a Notice of Violation accusing coppro of violating rule 2170
(power 3) by changing eir nickname to The Robot, a confusing
nickname.
—Accuser Tanner L. Swett
Keba wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:09:12 -0700, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
wrote:
6783-89 are going to fail quorum about 30 hours from now, as only
four players coppro, Murphy, Wooble, Yally) have voted on them.
Active but not voted:
ais523, ehird, G., Keba, omd, Sgeo, Tanner L.
Keba wrote:
Is this similar to the AFO? I have not read the proposal/rule of that
player, because I did not want to get inspirated by it, I want to create
something different.
The AFO was a contract-based legal person that any member of the
contract could control at any time by announcement.
G. wrote:
The physicist is an office and should be held by the PM. Its weekly
report contains how often and by whom the PM has been powered, who is the
Energy Spender and a list of all bot-PM actions of the previous seven days.
If the PM holds this office, no real person would be
Keba wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this.
Enough ergs to discuss something?
Well, it was labelled distributable via fee.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Alex Smith wrote:
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
http://agora.qoid.us/current_flr.html?annotate=1
Ambiguous annotations found so far:
Fixed most of these.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Also, you cannot do this, as Wooble CAN legally distribute a proposal.
Not this one.
26 matches
Mail list logo
