On 08/23/2010 05:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so
that
rights apply to "natural persons" only. This is probably a good idea
anyway
in a separate proposal, and a good time to do it while we have no
non-natural
players.
Right, thanks for the proposal ;) But if I remember correctly, the Robot
has a similar clause...
Heh. I didn't read the Robot quite as carefully, I would have noted it
there, too... -G.
Some other non-natural players like Bayes and other nomics should have
(had) rights. I think the restriction should be limited so that only
rule-defined entities have no rights.
-coppco
