On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED that no interpretation of Agoran law or > binding agreement may substantially limit or remove a natural > person's rights as defined by this Rule, except through the > explicit and legal amendment of this Rule. For the interpretation > of the following Rights, "person" refers to natural (first-class) > persons only, and "player" refers to a player who is also a > natural person.
Get rid of (first-class), it just confuses things if the term is ever redefined.
