On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
> <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > This violates R101(vii).  The only way I can think to get around it (it
> has
> > come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so
> that
> > rights apply to "natural persons" only.  This is probably a good idea
> > anyway
> > in a separate proposal, and a good time to do it while we have no
> > non-natural
> > players.
> 
> Right, thanks for the proposal ;) But if I remember correctly, the Robot
> has a similar clause...

Heh.  I didn't read the Robot quite as carefully, I would have noted it
there, too... -G.



Reply via email to