FWIW, although I prefer not to have disinterested proposals (because when we
had them players seemed to more often mark good proposals as disinterested than
the other way around, and even simple proposals stimulate the game), I do think
these should be merged into one proposal.
omd
Sent from
On 15 May 2013 15:14, Jonathan Rouillardjonathan.rouill...@gmail.com
wrote:
However, marking it as abandoned doesn't feel right - the players
didn't abandon the game, it just ended properly.
So, ended properly was a possibility not hitherto contemplated by Agora?
Another possibility
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:31 AM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I judge GUILTY - FINE (2 VCs)
All right, but I don't have any VCs, nor any way of obtaining them
within seven days, so I won't be able to pay this fine, and I can't be
punished for not paying it. Maybe a different sentence would
This is, for the record, exactly the scam that prompted me to make my recent
proposal regarding Messy Statements. I believe that under the current version,
it's impossible to get a win with a scam like this that relies on infinite
recursion.
However, I believe you messed it up anyway, first
This one also falls under true and determinate.
omd
Sent from my iPhone
On May 19, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I create the following 5 promises for each of [N] below equal to
1,2,3,4,5. (specifying this as a single action is an administrative
On Sun, 19 May 2013, com...@gmail.com wrote:
This is, for the record, exactly the scam that prompted me to make my recent
proposal regarding Messy Statements. I believe that under the current
version, it's impossible to get a win with a scam like this that relies on
infinite recursion.
On Sun, 19 May 2013, com...@gmail.com wrote:
This one also falls under true and determinate.
Again, the collection is true and determinate, although
you are right this is more oscillatory than the last one.
On Sun, 19 May 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 19 May 2013, com...@gmail.com wrote:
This is, for the record, exactly the scam that prompted me to make my
recent proposal regarding Messy Statements. I believe that under the
current version, it's impossible to get a win with a scam like
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
[My apologies if this was done before and I missed it!]
I submit the following Promise, 'DOA', to the Tree:
Text: Hello, World.
Conditions for Cashing: There is a copy (i.e. fungible instance)
of this Promise
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I create the following 5 promises for each of [N] below equal to
1,2,3,4,5. (specifying this as a single action is an administrative
convenience, as they are non-fungible promises).
Title: The Unexpected Cashing [N].
The transfer is conditional on Wes being able to do something in the future
(cash the promise, with a condition of 'false') that will be impossible whether
the transfer succeeds or not (if it succeeds, the condition is false; if it
fails, e can't cash it because e doesn't own it), so it
On 19 May 2013, at 19:52, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
OFFICE HOLDER SINCE ASSUMPTION NOMINATION
- --- -- -- --
A-A-L [1] Roujo2013-04-12 Postulated 2013-04-12
Assessor Murphy
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On 19 May 2013, at 19:52, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
OFFICE HOLDER SINCE ASSUMPTION NOMINATION
- --- -- -- --
A-A-L [1]
On 20 May 2013, at 01:44, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Proposal: No Recordkeeping Burden (AI=1)
{{{
Submitting a promise with an intent other than that the Promise be
given to another player or to
the Tree as a form of binding obligation on the submitter is the
On Sun, 19 May 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: No Recordkeeping Burden (AI=1){{{
Submitting a promise with an intent other than that the Promise be
given to another player or to
the Tree as a form of binding obligation on the submitter is the Crime
of Empty Promise.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, 19 May 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: No Recordkeeping Burden (AI=1){{{
Submitting a promise with an intent other than that the Promise be
given to another player or to
the Tree as a form of
16 matches
Mail list logo
