On 8/6/13 14:14 , Charles Walker wrote:
> I'd really appreciate some feedback on the following, in particular
> whether the ###-delimited section should be removed or not, but also
> generally.
>
> --- A PLAYERS' GUIDE TO THE GAME OF AGORA ---
[snip]
> Just about everything you can do in the game
On 7 Aug 2013, at 01:26, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:24 -0400, Max Schutz wrote:
>> wait we have to re-register again
>
> Probably not. Wooble thinks we do, but I'm not sure if anyone else
> agrees with em.
>
> One common problem with nomic is that people disagree as to what th
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:26 AM, James Beirne wrote:
> CFJ: Fool violated Rule 101 by failing to treat Agora right good forever, by
> purporting to deregister all other players and subsequently lock them out of
> the game.
>
> Judgement: GUILTY/EXILE
>
> I assign the maximum remaining sentence of T
On 7 August 2013 10:20, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:26 AM, James Beirne wrote:
>> CFJ: Fool violated Rule 101 by failing to treat Agora right good forever, by
>> purporting to deregister all other players and subsequently lock them out of
>> the game.
>>
>> Judgement: GUILTY/EXILE
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I suggest the judge file a motion to reconsider (Rule 2318) and assign
> the correct judgement, as any ambiguity here is not a good idea.
I think two mutually-contradictory actions should be enough to
consider it simply ambiguous in the firs
On 7 August 2013 11:15, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> I suggest the judge file a motion to reconsider (Rule 2318) and assign
>> the correct judgement, as any ambiguity here is not a good idea.
>
> I think two mutually-contradictory actions should be
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 06:15 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> > I suggest the judge file a motion to reconsider (Rule 2318) and assign
> > the correct judgement, as any ambiguity here is not a good idea.
>
> I think two mutually-contradictory acti
On 7 August 2013 05:27, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> To subscribe to the mailing lists, go to http://agoranomic.org/ which
>> has links to all five lists.
>
> I would really like to decrease the burden of this, incidentally.
Would it be possible to allo
Here's the second draft, with everyone's corrections and suggestions
included. ais523 mentioned in irc that e got a degree for an "FAQ-like
document". Is this up to standard?
--- A PLAYERS' GUIDE TO THE GAME OF AGORA ---
Table of Contents
-
I.What is nomic?
II. What is Agora
::applause::
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> - Teucer's counterscam failed to allow em to repeal rules
> (no opinion on whether it's a paradox)
I note that, while you profess no opinion, you pointed out the way in
which it very probably fails to create a paradox - I stepp
On 7 August 2013 14:21, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Props. 7548-7586, I vote ENDORSE Murphy.
It seems unlikely that Murphy will vote.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 14:21, Benjamin Schultz
> wrote:
> > On Props. 7548-7586, I vote ENDORSE Murphy.
>
> It seems unlikely that Murphy will vote.
>
Did e go inactive or AFK?
Would you like to convince me to endorse someone else?
--
OscarMeyr
On 7 August 2013 15:13, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>>
>> On 7 August 2013 14:21, Benjamin Schultz
>> wrote:
>> > On Props. 7548-7586, I vote ENDORSE Murphy.
>>
>> It seems unlikely that Murphy will vote.
>
> Did e go inactive or AFK?
>
> Wou
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 15:13, Benjamin Schultz
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Charles Walker <
> charles.w.wal...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7 August 2013 14:21, Benjamin Schultz
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Props. 7548-7586, I vo
On Aug 7, 2013 9:29 AM, "Charles Walker" wrote:
>
> I hereby resolve the election for the office of Government Waste. The
> votes were as follows:
>
> woggle - Machiavelli, woggle, Walker, G.
> ais523 - ais523, Roujo
> ehird - ehird
> Ienpw III - Ienpw III
>
> woggle is the option selected by Agor
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> (The recent TIME OUT scam, which made players
> inactive, likewise doesn't actually work on vote resolution, for this
> reason; however, it would have worked on proposal /distribution/, back
> before the loophole was patched.)
The recent TIME OU
Oh, and further arguments: I think that the "please treat Agora right good
forever" clause is vague enough that it should not be punishable in cases of
negligence, but only in cases of actual malice.
—Machiavelli
On 2013-08-07, Alex Smith wrote:
> I judge CFJ 3381 TRUE.
>
> The rest of this message, below this paragraph, is a thesis. I submit it
> with intent to qualify for a degree. It is /also/ my judge's arguments
> and evidence.
[snip]
This is an excellent Judgement and an excellent Thesis.
Thanks f
For the record, I support an appeal.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 20:18, omd wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:28 AM, James Beirne
> wrote:
> >> Judgement: GUILTY/TIME OUT (21 days)
> >
> > I intend to appeal this judgement with two support, as I d
On 7 August 2013 22:57, omd wrote:
> (The precise definition of "text" is generally left to the
> Registrar's discretion, but should be conservative; no emoji.)
Please just allow Unicode strings -- or better, stay silent on the
matter. Defining "text" is a fool's errand, and explicitl
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 22:57, omd wrote:
>> (The precise definition of "text" is generally left to the
>> Registrar's discretion, but should be conservative; no emoji.)
>
> Please just allow Unicode strings -- or better, stay silent on t
On 8 August 2013 00:29, comex wrote:
> The quoted paragraph is intended to be explicitly mostly silent on the
> matter, only using emoji as an example. Em⭕️ji is annoying, but so is
> z̸̨̜͈̦̹̜͕̥͈̱̟̙̰͍͈̻̠̩̝͈͝a̵̱̳̣̗̳̣͍̭̣̝̲̠͚̤̞͢͠ͅl̨̨̢̙̫̣̖̭̖͍̦̞̠̹͞g̢̛̻͇̜̙̟̗̲͇̬̫͘̕o͔͇̺͎͍̞̦͖̥͔̝̕͢͟ͅ,
> ｆｕｌｌｗｉｄｔｈ, ├box dra
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> I don't see why we should care about this in flair but nowhere else.
> It seems completely irrelevant to me.
Well... we have CFJs and proposals, which naturally go out of
circulation after a limited amount of time, and names, which aren't
actu
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Oh, and further arguments: I think that the "please treat Agora right good
> forever" clause is vague enough that it should not be punishable in cases of
> negligence, but only in cases of actual malice.
>
> —Machiavelli
I opine that a small
Yeah, I struggled a lot with this. I decided 21 in the end after comparing
other sentences of TIME OUT. 7-14 days seems typical for repeated neglect
of duties and this seemed a bit more extreme to me.
On 2013-08-07 9:57 PM, "Craig Daniel" wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tanner Swett wro
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby resolve the Agoran Decision to select a degree to award for
> ais523's thesis "A History of Agoran Wins, 2009-Present"
Of note, this decision was initiated about three years ago.
26 matches
Mail list logo
