On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 02:04, Rebecca via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I think by whatever dictionary meaning of the word any you use, universal
> or existential, I can at least convince you all that the sentence is so
> ambiguous as to be unsolvable with pure Englis
I think by whatever dictionary meaning of the word any you use, universal
or existential, I can at least convince you all that the sentence is so
ambiguous as to be unsolvable with pure English. Although I could have used
other factors in resolving the case, I opted to use "common sense" (an
enumer
""A worker CAN dispose of a shipment if a recipient cannot eat any apple
within"
I think this sentence means the same thing as my example sentence. If "a
recipient can eat any apple within the shipment", they can eat every single
apple because any is universal here, the apple is arbitrarily select
I just realized I top-posted. I apologize.
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 8:46 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not actually convinced by the region example; I initially read that
> the other way, and on rereading think it's ambiguous. Still, the apple
> example
I'm not actually convinced by the region example; I initially read that the
other way, and on rereading think it's ambiguous. Still, the apple example
seems sound, and I find that a good enough as an analogue. Good judgement!
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 5:56 PM Rebecca via agora-business <
agora
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 16:40, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >>> the valid options are the zombies a) that were eligible for auction at
> >>> its initiation and b) whose master switch has not changed in the
> >> meanwhile.
> >>
> >> Right now the Regist
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 17:09, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> 3. Definitions of specific types of decisions are meted out to lower-level
> rules or even subsidiary bodies of law, e.g. election procedure no longer
> needs to be tied in to high-powered rules.
>
Oh this made me think of self-ratification and h
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 16:56, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/5/2020 1:45 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 4/5/20 4:38 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by appending "T
On 4/5/2020 1:45 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 4/5/20 4:38 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by appending "The above
> notwithstanding, an entity CANNOT withdraw a non-PRESENT vote on an
auction
> decision
On 4/5/20 4:38 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by appending "The above
notwithstanding, an entity CANNOT withdraw a non-PRESENT vote on an
>>> auction
decision except to change eir vote to one with an equal or higher bid."
>>> I
On 4/4/2020 10:45 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 00:28, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 4/4/2020 8:55 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> A zombie auction is an Agoran decision to award ownership of zombies to
>>> players. A zombie is eligible for a
On 3/26/2020 7:48 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 3/19/20 7:19 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>> I recuse the judge of CFJ 7 from CFJ 7 (note: this may do nothing).
>>
>> I assign CFJ 7 to Jason.
>>
>> CFJ 7 =
12 matches
Mail list logo
