Nostalgic curiosity brings me to check in on Agora, only to find myself
(Elysion) branded a fugitive! This injustice cannot be permitted to continue,
and I demand satisfaction in the most Agoran way possible: a pedantic logical
argument.
(The statements here are true to the best of my
A pretty self-explanatory subject line...
--
Elysion
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:51:22 -0500
comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Joshua Boehme boehm...@msu.edu wrote:
This judge sees no reason why the statement in question (I make Proposal X
democratic) should be considered ambiguous when similar statements about
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:28:32 +
Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Dec 2008, at 20:26, Roger Hicks wrote:
As required by this sentence I destroy one coin in my possession.
I would recommend judges to fine more like 10 coins in future, 1 coin is
near-worthless.
It's worth
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:16:41 -0700
Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Market agreement
as follows:
{
Insert after the first sentence of section 2:
{{
Ownership of Vote Points is restricted to persons.
}}
Upon the adoption of this
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:59:20 -0700
Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 16:43, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:16:41 -0700
Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Market agreement
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:24:37 +
Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Taral wrote:
AGAINST (scammable)
how?
I just told my dog that I purported to ratify a document. (No, not really, but
that illustrates one of the problems.)
--
Elysion
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:59:44 +
Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CFJ: The PRS is a contest
Arguments:
Wooble neat, PRS isn't a contest; Notary is recordkeepor of
contestmasters so ratifying the Scorekeepor report didn't make it a
contest.
Wooble and since the Scorekeepor
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:09:13 -0700
Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 19:19, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend, with the support of the people, to amend the PBA by
replacing section 17 with:
{{
17. Every midnight (UTC) that the PBA had zero of a
On 23 Nov 2008 00:00:16 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I PBA-deposit all the assets I recently withdrew in the message titled
Bank run, part 1 (I believe this gets me ^667).
Until woggle's amendment is adopted, I encourage all Comrades to deposit large
quantities of assets close to midnight.
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:06:48 -0700
Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 07:23, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Again, these are maximally severable, and my Coin and Chit estimates are
provided only for convenience.)
I PBA-withdraw a 7 Crop (^-14)
I RBOA
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:13:34 -0500
Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:06:48 -0700
Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 07:23, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Again, these are maximally severable, and my Coin and Chit estimates
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:50:00 -0700
Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Nov 2008 00:00:16 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I PBA-deposit all the assets I recently withdrew in the message titled
Bank run, part 1
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:52 -0500
Jamie Dallaire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both sides. If
need be this can be a Werewolves-like endeavour.
Would anyone be interested in playing the following, based on Robert
Axelrod's and WD
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:21:06 -0800
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why make it different than 30-days due to normal deregistration? Facing
this, I'd personally just write an equally pissed-off letter followed by
this is
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:31:06 -0800
Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== CFJ 2271 ==
None of the attempted registrations (P1 through P100) in comex's
quoted message were succesful.
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:41:11 -0500
comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cause Rule 1367 to amend itself by adding the following historical
annotation:
{
Note: comex CAN, and has been able to for the past several months,
cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.
}
Annotations != rules.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:31:06 -0800
Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Caller's Arguments:
Rule 869 states in part:
A player CAN deregister by announcement. E CANNOT register
within thirty days after doing so.
The question is, does the so in the second sentence refer to
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:03:20 -0800
Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to make Proposals 5956 and 5962 democratic.
I support. With 2 support, I make Proposals 5956 and 5962
(This is NOT a proposal, as there is a pending CFJ on this matter. Comments on
the wording would be welcome.)
Allow Changes to Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions (AI=2)
Amend rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Decisions) by appending the
following paragraph:
Other rules may specify methods
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:03:02 +
Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/17 Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The question is, does the so in the second sentence refer to
deregister[ing] or to deregister[ing] by announcement? If the latter,
then even deregistrations by means
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:04:19 -0500
Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the
holders of the IADoP and Tailor offices. The eligible voters are the
active players and the vote collector is the IADoP.
For IADoP, the valid options
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:47:59 -0500
Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/17 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
CoE:
This is missing most of the votes that were cast on this proposal.
I intend, with 2 support, to
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:03:51 +
Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:58 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 19:32, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Don't want to be bound by contests broken when equity dies Unfortunate
but not
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:49:16 +
Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Nov 2008, at 19:14, Sgeo wrote:
Might I point out that if they were to invade us with a sufficiently
large invasion force, Agora would lose, badly, in weeks?
You serious? I doubt half of them could even make
Proto-proto: The Philanthropist
There shall exist an office knowns as the Philanthropist. Eir duties shall
include organizing non-mandatory ways for Agorans to collectively contribute to
the extra-Agoran world.
Some possible ideas would be making artistic creations that non-Agorans could
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:21:04 -0600
Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 08 November 2008 08:50:51 pm comex wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2252
== CFJ
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:23:40 -0500
comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This distribution of proposal 5948
By the way, am I the only one getting sick of these super-frequent
distributions?
No.
Could we perhaps
Before I started working on some protos, I wanted to get a feel for people's
opinions. There's not much point in taking the trouble to rewrite sections of
the rules if people are still enjoying them. Thus, I am wondering: what aspects
of the ruleset do people still enjoy or are still playing
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:33:10 -0700
Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I CFJ on the statement, The proposal submitted by root at or around
Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:03:48 UTC has been distributed.
Arguments:
The proposal was submitted with this title:
{{{
2001
A Space
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:50:02 -0500
Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:03:50 pm Sgeo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ed Murphy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I host the Agoran Coat of Arms, or may I link to your copy, or
should I just remove the
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:14:29 -0500
Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our Bards are Three! Let's celebrate
And not this moment shun --
Proposal, Poet Laureate,
AI and II 1:
{
[Ordain an Office for us who'll
Ensure that prose stays not the same.]
At Power 1, create a Rule,
The Poet
is still defined to some degree in relation to
those.
...meaning e could cause a series of CFJs as soon as e registers. It seems
very Agoran, somehow...
Joshua Boehme
33 matches
Mail list logo
