DIS: Such Vile Calumny!

2024-05-12 Thread Joshua Boehme via agora-discussion
Nostalgic curiosity brings me to check in on Agora, only to find myself (Elysion) branded a fugitive! This injustice cannot be permitted to continue, and I demand satisfaction in the most Agoran way possible: a pedantic logical argument. (The statements here are true to the best of my

DIS: Whither Werewolves?

2009-01-08 Thread Joshua Boehme
A pretty self-explanatory subject line... -- Elysion

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2274 assigned to Elysion

2008-12-13 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:51:22 -0500 comex com...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Joshua Boehme boehm...@msu.edu wrote: This judge sees no reason why the statement in question (I make Proposal X democratic) should be considered ambiguous when similar statements about

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CFJ 2301

2008-12-10 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:28:32 + Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10 Dec 2008, at 20:26, Roger Hicks wrote: As required by this sentence I destroy one coin in my possession. I would recommend judges to fine more like 10 coins in future, 1 coin is near-worthless. It's worth

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I has a trumpet

2008-12-08 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:16:41 -0700 Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Market agreement as follows: { Insert after the first sentence of section 2: {{ Ownership of Vote Points is restricted to persons. }} Upon the adoption of this

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I has a trumpet

2008-12-08 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:59:20 -0700 Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 16:43, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:16:41 -0700 Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Market agreement

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5985-5990

2008-11-30 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:24:37 + Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Taral wrote: AGAINST (scammable) how? I just told my dog that I purported to ratify a document. (No, not really, but that illustrates one of the problems.) -- Elysion

DIS: Re: BUS: PRS

2008-11-26 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:59:44 + Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CFJ: The PRS is a contest Arguments: Wooble neat, PRS isn't a contest; Notary is recordkeepor of contestmasters so ratifying the Scorekeepor report didn't make it a contest. Wooble and since the Scorekeepor

DIS: Re: BUS: PBA Amendment

2008-11-23 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:09:13 -0700 Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 19:19, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I intend, with the support of the people, to amend the PBA by replacing section 17 with: {{ 17. Every midnight (UTC) that the PBA had zero of a

DIS: Re: BUS: Bank run, part 2

2008-11-23 Thread Joshua Boehme
On 23 Nov 2008 00:00:16 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I PBA-deposit all the assets I recently withdrew in the message titled Bank run, part 1 (I believe this gets me ^667). Until woggle's amendment is adopted, I encourage all Comrades to deposit large quantities of assets close to midnight.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking Spree #2

2008-11-23 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:06:48 -0700 Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 07:23, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Again, these are maximally severable, and my Coin and Chit estimates are provided only for convenience.) I PBA-withdraw a 7 Crop (^-14) I RBOA

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking Spree #2

2008-11-23 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:13:34 -0500 Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:06:48 -0700 Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 07:23, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Again, these are maximally severable, and my Coin and Chit estimates

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bank run, part 2

2008-11-23 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:50:00 -0700 Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 23 Nov 2008 00:00:16 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I PBA-deposit all the assets I recently withdrew in the message titled Bank run, part 1

Re: DIS: Proto: Subgame/Contest: The Evolution of Cooperation

2008-11-22 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:52 -0500 Jamie Dallaire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both sides. If need be this can be a Werewolves-like endeavour. Would anyone be interested in playing the following, based on Robert Axelrod's and WD

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)

2008-11-18 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:21:06 -0800 Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why make it different than 30-days due to normal deregistration? Facing this, I'd personally just write an equally pissed-off letter followed by this is

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2271 assigned to BobTHJ

2008-11-18 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:31:06 -0800 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: == CFJ 2271 == None of the attempted registrations (P1 through P100) in comex's quoted message were succesful.

DIS: Re: OFF: [scam] rulekeepor's notes on proposals 5949-5964

2008-11-18 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:41:11 -0500 comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cause Rule 1367 to amend itself by adding the following historical annotation: { Note: comex CAN, and has been able to for the past several months, cause this rule to amend itself by announcement. } Annotations != rules.

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2271 assigned to BobTHJ

2008-11-18 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:31:06 -0800 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Caller's Arguments: Rule 869 states in part: A player CAN deregister by announcement. E CANNOT register within thirty days after doing so. The question is, does the so in the second sentence refer to

DIS: Re: BUS: Just in case

2008-11-18 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:03:20 -0800 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: root wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I intend, with 2 support, to make Proposals 5956 and 5962 democratic. I support. With 2 support, I make Proposals 5956 and 5962

DIS: Proto: Allow Changes to Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions (AI=2)

2008-11-17 Thread Joshua Boehme
(This is NOT a proposal, as there is a pending CFJ on this matter. Comments on the wording would be welcome.) Allow Changes to Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions (AI=2) Amend rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Decisions) by appending the following paragraph: Other rules may specify methods

DIS: Re: BUS: If at first you don't succeed...

2008-11-16 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:03:02 + Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/17 Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The question is, does the so in the second sentence refer to deregister[ing] or to deregister[ing] by announcement? If the latter, then even deregistrations by means

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Elections for IADoP, Tailor

2008-11-16 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:04:19 -0500 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the holders of the IADoP and Tailor offices. The eligible voters are the active players and the vote collector is the IADoP. For IADoP, the valid options

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Voting results for Proposal 5961

2008-11-16 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:47:59 -0500 Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/17 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]: CoE: This is missing most of the votes that were cast on this proposal. I intend, with 2 support, to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: forgot something

2008-11-10 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:03:51 + Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:58 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote: On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 19:32, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Don't want to be bound by contests broken when equity dies Unfortunate but not

Re: DIS: [Fwd: RE: Proposal: Expanded foreign relations]

2008-11-09 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:49:16 + Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8 Nov 2008, at 19:14, Sgeo wrote: Might I point out that if they were to invade us with a sufficiently large invasion force, Agora would lose, badly, in weeks? You serious? I doubt half of them could even make

DIS: Proto-proto: Philanthropist

2008-11-09 Thread Joshua Boehme
Proto-proto: The Philanthropist There shall exist an office knowns as the Philanthropist. Eir duties shall include organizing non-mandatory ways for Agorans to collectively contribute to the extra-Agoran world. Some possible ideas would be making artistic creations that non-Agorans could

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2252 assigned to comex

2008-11-09 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:21:04 -0600 Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 08 November 2008 08:50:51 pm comex wrote: On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2252 == CFJ

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-09 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:23:40 -0500 comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This distribution of proposal 5948 By the way, am I the only one getting sick of these super-frequent distributions? No. Could we perhaps

DIS: Straw Poll

2008-11-07 Thread Joshua Boehme
Before I started working on some protos, I wanted to get a feel for people's opinions. There's not much point in taking the trouble to rewrite sections of the rules if people are still enjoying them. Thus, I am wondering: what aspects of the ruleset do people still enjoy or are still playing

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5841-5941

2008-11-06 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:33:10 -0700 Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I CFJ on the statement, The proposal submitted by root at or around Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:03:48 UTC has been distributed. Arguments: The proposal was submitted with this title: {{{ 2001 A Space

Re: DIS: New agoranomic.org page

2008-10-24 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:50:02 -0500 Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:03:50 pm Sgeo wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: May I host the Agoran Coat of Arms, or may I link to your copy, or should I just remove the

Re: DIS: Proto: Poet Laureate

2008-10-24 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:14:29 -0500 Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our Bards are Three! Let's celebrate And not this moment shun -- Proposal, Poet Laureate, AI and II 1: { [Ordain an Office for us who'll Ensure that prose stays not the same.] At Power 1, create a Rule, The Poet

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I register

2006-12-20 Thread Joshua Boehme
is still defined to some degree in relation to those. ...meaning e could cause a series of CFJs as soon as e registers. It seems very Agoran, somehow... Joshua Boehme