On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Any player CAN, by announcement, initiate an election for a
specified elected office for which no election has been
initiated in the preceding 90 days. Any player CAN, with
4 Supporters, initiate an
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I thought it was a nomic.
The country might be a nomic and it is a nomic and it is a nomic.
CFJ 1879
Intentional.
On 6/7/09, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
How ironic!
On 2009-06-07, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/7/09, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/6/6 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2548
== CFJ 2548 ==
Proposal 6335 had the
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
If this is correct:
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
Pavitra 1 7 0 2 2 2 2 1 3 13 4 1
then you deposited crops as follows:
total: 728 zm
WRVs aren't
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Also AGAINST. There must be a better way than invalidating the
transaction completely. Maybe a general rule for disambiguating?
Well... if you're depositing so many assets (and getting such a low
multiplier)
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/6/4 comex com...@gmail.com:
While everyone else mounts a run on the bank in panic.
If you are trying to improve on the perceived flaws of the PBA I'm
surprised that you're relying on any human behavior
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/6/4 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
It responded to me within 2 seconds (but then it's less than 50 feet
away from me so YMMV).
D'you think that might have something to do with being on your network?
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
Sorry, but this fails as the order is unspecified.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
All this is far more complicated than it's worth.
{
Amend rule 1742 (Contracts) by appending the paragraph:
A person CAN on behalf of another as authorized by a public
contract to which the person
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
options
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c-walker wrote:
No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
--
C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
as one cannot
Actions in Agora are generally ordered; unordered actions are accepted
only when they cause no ambiguity because the order is unimportant to
the rules. Assets are rule-defined entities and allowing the unordered
transfers (before the amendment I proposed, which specifies a default
order,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
To reduce long-term ambiguity, I deposit all my crops in the IBA in the
order that maximizes the net amount of zm thereby gained.
If this is correct:
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
3. Immediately after an Agoran Decision is initiated, the Conservative
Party acts on behalf of each of its parties to cause that party to vote
on that decision with the option selected being party stance on
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
All,
I've put together a basic multiplayer Game of Life program online:
http://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/life/
This was running rather slowly for me, so I modified it a bit to use
an HTML canvas:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 10:49 -0400, Quazie wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
I nominate Murphy as Clerk of
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/6/1 comex com...@gmail.com:
http://qoid.us/life.html
Nice; combine with my suggestion?
I don't understand your suggestion; the original is already doing this:
function run() {
if (stop==false
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Rodlen wrote:
I judge CFJ 2541 FALSE and CFJ 2542 TRUE. In the first case, Quazie
attempted to announce that the rule repealed itself without causing it
to repeal itself. In the second case, e did cause it to repeal itself.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
at OscarMeyr became
Speaker on 20 May 2009.
Canada is a player, and an active one at that.
It is a person; I'm not aware of it ever becoming
, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree to the IBA.
I flip the IBA's Disclosure to Public; its text is listed above; its
parties are myself, comex, and BobTHJ.
I flip the IBA's Sentiment to Legalistic.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
It does, but 2240 only applies to self-contradictory chains of
precedence/deference clauses within a rule. If a rule simply
reads X, but notwithstanding that, Y, then 2240 does not apply,
and common sense says that Y
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
We played this a couple years ago and it was fun. Anyone interested
enough for me to do a more complete contest description (tighten the
Agoran-legal language of the below and fiddle to find good values for
M,P,T,
I recommend just using HTML/Javascript, there's nothing here that
really requires an applet.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 29, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Quazie wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Benjamin Caplan
I suggest:
M=64
P=8
Not to mention that an equivalent proprosal would probably limit it to
1-2 weeks.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 28, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
are the active first-class players, and the vote collector
is the Assessor. The valid options on each decision are FOR, AGAINST,
and PRESENT.
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6324 O 1 1.0 comex Just my Opinion
6325 D 1 3.0 coppro Fix Promotion Mistakes
6326 D 1 2.0
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
ehird wrote:
2009/5/27 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Would someone please explain Min. to Win? Â I'm sure I could work it
out, but I have enough other things on my plate as it is.
Minimum points to win?
PROTIP:
It's minimum to win, not most likely point gain before win..
Sent from my iPhone
On May 27, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 11:43 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
wrote:
ehird wrote:
2009/5
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
(and they were kind enough to announce it in a discussion forum...)
I intend, without objection, to flip the recognition of Fresh Nomic to
Sent from my iPhone
On May 25, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Human Point Two to register.
What Rule says you can act on behalf of HP2 to register emself with
Agoran consent?
Gratuitous: does the message contain a plain-text version without
artifacts? (I can't check...) If so, it's absurd to punish Yally for
including a monospaced HTML version. In Gmail and on iPhone, a
plaintext version would be displayed in variable width font (and it
can't be toggled on
It's as much a standard as the aforementioned email headers.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com
wrote:
2009/5/26 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
NoV: Yally violated R2143, commiting the Class-6 Crime of Making My
F F F F F A2A F F
BobTHJF P A P P F P F F P
comex A F A A A F A A A F
copproF F P P F F F5A A A
c-walker F P F F F
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Err, if proposals can't change the rules, and ratification can't change
the rules, what can? Does AIAN kick in?
If the new paragraph in R106 no longer grants permission, then I
suppose Rule 1698 (Agora Is a Nomic) prevented
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Human Point Two to register.
What Rule says you can act on behalf of HP2 to register emself with
Agoran
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Err, if proposals can't change the rules, and ratification can't change
the rules, what can? Does AIAN kick in?
Rule 106 later says the proposal ... takes effect.
But does that count as permission to make Rule Changes?
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
We really really need legislation in the area of act-on-behalf...
Proto-proto: A claim to act on behalf of another person constitutes
a self-ratifying claim that it is authorized by contract.
I'm not
Oh... I didn't notice. Something must be wrong with the cronjob,
which I'll fix ASAP. The online ruleset is up to date.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I friendly remind the Rulekeepor that the SLR has not been published
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/26 comex com...@gmail.com:
I support. I want a precedent in favor of dual-format messages for
previously stated reasons. (Considering that the text/plain was first, is
there any mail client where
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/26 comex com...@gmail.com:
the rest of the report follows. Only after the plain-text version
(and 3 lines of multipart header at the top) is the HTML version.
Rule 2143 requires that reports
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/26 comex com...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I deregister Bayes.
I pledge not to make any agreements with ehird in the future.
I
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:44 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
This was sent two hours after Goethe's judgement that a certain other
proposal existed in the pool. Accordingly, NoV: Wooble violated R2202
and committed the Class-8
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Arguments in my defense:
While ais523 was able to find one proposal that was in the pool that
was not in the published report, simply adding that proposal to the
report would not have guaranteed the accuracy of the
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Gratuitous: As judge didn't notice the ratification attempt; if I
had noticed it I would have delayed the judgement to avoid the issue.
Since the judgement found that, to the best of available evidence,
there had been
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:57 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
E could avoid breaching the rules by making a proposal to remove stale
proposals from the pool.
And since I don't know what they all are, someone would
91 119.2
comex165 119.5
Peekee 14 124.7
Sherlock 10 136.7
root 198 137.8
Iammars 16 153.6
Crito22 158.2
lee 10 171.9
Michael
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
authored proposals: count
More stats: (these from the Assessor DB, so only proposals since ~5822 count)
authored proposals (passed): count
who num
-
OscarMeyr 1
none 1
cdm014 1
avpx2
ehird
N.B. the ruleset has been ratified, but I'm not sure we haven't missed
knock-on effects to the gamestate. I think we still need a R1482
never contained that text ratification.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 22, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
These are only of academic
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
[T]he ratified document was completely true and accurate _at the time
it was published_.
The gamestate is modified so that. Effects are limited to modifying
the gamestate in some way.
That's recorded in the above history, as well as my later retraction
(in response to the AAA motion that would make it unnecessary).
Sent from my iPhone
On May 21, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:58 AM, comex com...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:52, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I act on behalf of the IBA to intend, with Agoran Consent, to register.
I
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Justiciar has no duty (AI=2)
Aw, I was expecting something much more interesting.
Proto: Rests CANNOT be created in a Minister Without Portfolio's
possession, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
SoA please note that the random crops should be awarded prior to later
expenditures.
This doesn't work: you can't spend assets you don't yet have.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Also, I will quite likely attempt to start NoVs for every occasion on
which anyone's ever breached a rule (since the time limit) whilst
believing themselves not to be breaching the rule at the time. The
precedent you're
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Also, the claimed action (sending false information to a Public
Forum) /is/ illegal; it just didn't happen. What you're affirming is not
what Taral judged; please at least give an error rating if you agree
with the verdict
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I opine AFFIRM. The incorrect information in the NoVs was the
assertion that each of the named players claimed that there are five
lights.
Judge Taral stated that the incorrect information in the NoVs was part
(b), which
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 15:46 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
1) For each active player not a party to this contract, ais523
publishes a Notice of Violation accusing that player of
violating the Power=1 Rule 2215
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
comex wrote:
WHEREAS Rule 101 i., as far as I can tell, has no effect whatsoever;
ii., the right to a judicial process, can be
satisfied trivially (BUS: Formality; 2/17/09
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
The available options for this Decision are A.N., B.N., M.N., D.N.Hist.,
D.N.Sci., D.N.Phil., and FAILING GRADE.
WTB ranked votes.
That's the purpose of the high
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I resolve the Agoran decision to decide the holder of the IADoP office.
CoE: this resolution is INVALID as there are two or more valid
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
6310 D 1 2.0 coppro Maple Leaf Dominance
AGAINST, grammatically incorrect (it's vs its) and despite the AI
it would
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
While I'm all for a re-election, I don't think that failure to report
or perhaps notice a conditional circularity (when lack of circularity
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel like distributions are currently really hard to parse as it is
when there are tons of proposals, this proto would potentially
increase the length of distributions N fold, where N is the number of
players. Its
by Arnold Bros (est. 1905):
05 May 2009 18:22:25 GMT
Appealed by comex: 05 May 2009 18:33:14 GMT
Appealed by Goethe: 05 May 2009 18:43:05 GMT
Appealed by Murphy: 05 May 2009 18:52:21 GMT
Appealed
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
If a player votes KILL on a Motion, eir vote is counted as a vote
AGAINST that Motion. Additionally, if the Motion passes, then:
a) If that player has no pending Offers, then e ceases to become a
party to the contract at the same
I suggest H. Michael Norrish.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Nathan Maron n_ma...@hotmail.com
Date: May 12, 2009 7:37:41 AM EDT
To: aeri...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [aerican] Ruling Earth: Part 1 of 2
Reply-To: aeri...@yahoogroups.com
I'd like to thank everyone who
It's in eir report.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 12, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
According to the rules, the Insulator SHALL announce whether an NoV is
valid or not. Does e do this? I don't think I've seen em do it.
--
-Tiger
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 13:19, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:12 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with ehird's consent, to cause Bayes to become active,
I intend, with ehird's consent
; otherwise, I do it in reverse
order.
* Either I send 2 zm to the AFO and AFO sends 1 zm to Quazie, or I
send 1 zm to the AFO and 1 to Quazie.
- PSocliriitbiecian comex
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I vote PRESENCE on every Agoran Decision currently in its voting period.
This fails; you can't vote PRESENT for elections.
yet.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
6273 Quick-and-dirty-fix D 3.0 3 coppro
Are we *sure* this one's right?
No, it's wrong. coppro distributed it by mistake.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM TITLE T AI II AUTHOR
6274 Quick-and-dirty-fix 3 D 3.0 1 coppro
I nominate Wooble for promotor. If you're going to make emergency
distributions, at least
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
H. Rulekeepor comex, could you please publish to a-d, or link to a
website containing, the ruleset as of the adoption of R1482/2? If we're
going to have a Massive Gamestate Recalculation, we may as well have a
good starting
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Note: if this problem really exists in Agora, it exists in Suber's
initial ruleset too.
To elucidate the situation: in Suber's ruleset, as well as in Agora,
there is a situation where, if irrelevant changes were
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
There are two competing senses of stipulate to choose from: Wooble's,
by which no rule currently stipulates anything, and the crisis-causing
one, by which lots of proposals probably had no effect and the
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the least breaky interpretation is that all those proposals did
in fact go through, but that R1482 selectively limits the meanings that
the rule texts can take on. That is, when a rule created after the
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Gratuitous reply:
I see what you're saying, and that this is generally what R1482
intends, but I have a hard time saying that a claim This rule
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
While you work on that, here's a list of reports we'll need ratified to
reset the game state:
Nope. As I said, while ugly, simply ratifying that the offending
proposal never took effect will reset the gamestate just fine and
If we're going to invade, the next 22.5 hours would certainly be well
suited for the purpose.
-- Forwarded message --
From: aeri...@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:03 AM
Subject: [aerican] Aerica Day, 5/8/2009, 12:00 am
To: aeri...@yahoogroups.com
Reminder from:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:23 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Another option is that, in order to interpret the Rules at any
particular instant, we should use the guidelines specified in the
/last/ instant. Thus
On May 6, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com wrote:
Weakening the connection between Comex and the PNP should help the
PNP's reputation. With thanks to ais523, I would like to suggest
the following judgment:
Until May 28, 2009, it is ILLEGAL for Comex to join the PNP.
How
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com wrote:
I CfJ on the following statement:
CFJ :p
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 15:19 -0400, comex wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com wrote:
I CfJ on the following statement:
CFJ :p
Hey, I often write it with a lowercase f. I agree that the capital
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 21:31 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Shouldn't that be Officor for homeland Security or something?
No, because an Officer isn't someone who offices.
Schroedingor?
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm... I CFJ on the following sentence. If a member of an entity's basis
nominates that entity for an election, then that entity has been
self-nominated.
Good call, never though of that.
Gratuitous: Most partnerships don't
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
Does that rule have a title, because it looks like the title you gave
is for the proposal.
Also, I think this is just a phase. I've been fantasizing about a war
between Agora and the Aerican Empire for some reason.
Unfortunately,
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I think this is just a phase. I've been fantasizing about a war
between Agora and the Aerican Empire for some reason.
Unfortunately, they claim to be a pacifist empire.
What if Agora attacked them?
How?
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this. On-time is arguably
meaningless outside the context of the player required to publish
the judgement. (The CotC's X judged Y by Z messages to a-o are
not part of eir duties,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
It would be a different issue if root were Insulator, I imagine; in that
case it might have been ambiguous whether root or the LFD got the
resulting Rest.
I don't believe the Insulator is allowed to create rests in the LFD's
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com wrote:
I CfJ on the following statement:
A proposal that fixes an obvious grammatical error that completely changes
the meaning of a rule counts as modifying a substantive aspect of the
meaning of the rule.
Just for clarity.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the proposal Privilege of the Champion, AI=2 II=2:
How about we just add an incentive for existing MwoPs to win-- reset
them to the beginning of the MwoP rotation-- and call it a day?
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Recordkeepors can create assets arbitrarily, but not choose who gets
them. (I suspect this is a really old holdover from the old asset
rules.) As a result, they're unowned assets and the LFD gets them.
Only assets whose
to the history of
the rule in the FLR:
Amended(14) by Proposal 5683 (Wooble), 8 September 2008
Amended(15) by SLR ratification (comex), 24 September 2008
i.e. the proposal was first amended by the missed proposal 5683, and
then amended back to the previous wording by ratification.
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
As soon as possible after the Speaker changes, the Herald SHALL
Suggest identity of the Speaker changes.
I hereby announce that the Speaker has changed into blue jeans and a
sharp-looking tan polo shirt.
CoE: I have
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I revoke 3 x-points from comex.
I revoke 2 x-points from Quazie.
FISH KEYBOARD = hallucination.
I revoke 3 y-points from comex.
I revoke 2 y-points from Tiger.
EMAG EHT NIW UOY = concentration.
I award 1 y-point to Tiger
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:43 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
== CFJ 2477 ==
coppro has won the game at least once.
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Amend Rule 402 (Identity of the Speaker) by adding the following to
the end of the first paragraph:
As soon as possible after the Speaker changes, the Herald SHALL
Suggest identity of the Speaker changes.
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 10:52 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I CFJ on the statement:
* It is ILLEGAL to grant certain powers (in the ordinary-language
sense) and privileges to Agora's ambassador if one is not a nomic.
Clever
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
It's possible to publish an NoV by sending it to a public forum, no
matter what lower-power rules think on the matter. Rules 101 and 478,
both power-3, give us the right of participation in the fora. And
publishing
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I destroy all of the Ribbons in the possession of Murphy, ais523,
coppro, and comex.
Fails: these assets are not owned by the Lost and Found Department.
501 - 600 of 1846 matches
Mail list logo
