Bucky wrote:
I publish the document located at this URL as gratuitous evidence:
http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg22200.html
I'm not going to bother with another CFJ, but in case anyone else wants
to, the above URL turns to be Bucky's own message, i.e. e presumably
A first-class person CAN register by sending a public message.
No more CFJs by non-players?
From that wording, it would still be possible. They CAN register, but they do
not necessarily do so.
To eliminate non-player CFJs, we could make it something like:
Any active player CAN
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by replacing
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that
indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Eric Stucky wrote:
A first-class person CAN register by sending a public message.
No more CFJs by non-players?
From that wording, it would still be possible. They CAN register, but they do
not necessarily do so.
Obviously the wording is unclear if at least a
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
A first-class person CAN register by sending a public message.
No more CFJs by non-players?
On 11-06-21 02:27 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
--- On Tue, 21/6/11, Pavitracelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Back on the first hand, I could have refrained from disclosing the
content of the document in question, and while it probably would have
been possible to discover this (the document does not
Can we establish a registration standard that does _not_ muck up every
attempt to use registration as a simple stock by-announcement action?
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Elliott Hird wrote:
Can we establish a registration standard that does _not_ muck up every
attempt to use registration as a simple stock by-announcement action?
For any given action in the game, if it was the Agoran tradition to
try and muck it up, it would be just as
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 11-06-21 02:27 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
--- On Tue, 21/6/11, Pavitracelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Back on the first hand, I could have refrained from disclosing the
content of the document in question, and while it probably would have
been
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote:
That being said, Pavitra's current questions apply to messages and actions in
general so this would just see it re-applied to votes or something else.
Proto: Registration tricks are old
Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by replacing:
On 06/20/2011 10:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
In particular, such disclosure had not happened at the time of message P
and hence [the first CFJ], and had occurred only to a non-public forum
at the time of message R and hence [the second CFJ].
Nice. And
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Tanner Swett wrote:
I publish the text at this URL:
http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=smalleroldid=11496569ctype=text/javascriptaction=raw
Actually, re-reading this one, I'd say this is pretty clearly ISID.
You published a link to the text; it's possible that
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
In particular, such disclosure had not happened at the time of message P
and hence [the first CFJ], and had occurred only to a non-public forum
at the time of message R and hence [the second CFJ].
Nice. And tricky.
On the other hand to the above, there's
Gratuitous: It's possible (if unlikely) that a shorter document has the same
sum.
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I hereby take the action described in the shortest document that has the
following SHA512 sum:
14 matches
Mail list logo
