omd wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Logic:
1. Â An Instrument explicitly CANNOT make changes power (R2140);
2. Â Exceptio probat regulam; therefore an instrument generally CAN make
changes = power.
[Note: I admit it's arguable and
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 15:38 -0500, com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:38 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
In fact: I intend (with notice) to set the power of R2324 to 1.
You mean, to cause it to set its own power to 1?
You didn't warn *me* like that!
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, com...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, I think this makes a nice trophy but doesn't really accomplish anything.
Oh of course it does. It means I have to be very careful about what I say I do
in the PF.
Proto trophy: Award G. the Patent Title 'First Violin' (AFAIK I'm the first
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, com...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, I think this makes a nice trophy but doesn't really accomplish
anything.
Oh of course it does. It means I have to be very careful about what I say I
do
in the PF.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, omd wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, com...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, I think this makes a nice trophy but doesn't really accomplish
anything.
Oh of course it does. It means I have to be very
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Logic:
1. An Instrument explicitly CANNOT make changes power (R2140);
2. Exceptio probat regulam; therefore an instrument generally CAN make
changes = power.
[Note: I admit it's arguable and therefore safer to a
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
It's a mechanism question, too:
CFJ (request linked): An instrument that generally CAN make announcements
generally
CAN make changes regulated by rules of equal or lower power, by announcement.
Time to update my
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:21 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I intend, with notice, to cause Rule 2324 to:
a) enact a Rule with power-1, title Article V, and the following text:
Murphy CAN cause this rule to make arbitrary gamestate changes,
except for any amendment of Rule 2223, by
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:21 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I intend, with notice, to cause Rule 2324 to:
a) enact a Rule with power-1, title Article V, and the following text:
Murphy CAN cause this rule to make arbitrary gamestate changes,
except for any amendment of Rule 2223, by
Lest some of us abuse the dictatorship or, better yet, don't pass it on. =P
~ Roujo
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:50 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:21 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I intend, with notice, to cause Rule 2324 to:
a) enact a Rule with power-1,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, ais523 wrote:
Incidentally, the proposals in question weren't meant to be immune to
dictator, according to IRC disccusion; they were just meant to clear the
dictatorship out from the ruleset given the apparent inactivity of the
dictator. (A classic case of a race
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:28 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, ais523 wrote:
especially if the dictatorship is at power 3...
By the way, for fun, I pledge not to (on purpose) use power1
on the dictatorship (unless I think of my own escalation that
works).
In fact: I
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
By the way, I'm pretty sure that the language as is doesn't give me
a Junta unless I make other gamestate changes (don't know if that was
by design or accidental). Does anyone think I *do* currently satisfy a
Junta
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:24 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
By the way, I'm pretty sure that the language as is doesn't give me
a Junta unless I make other gamestate changes (don't know if that was
by design or accidental). Does anyone think I *do* currently satisfy a
Junta win?
The restriction
On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:38 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
In fact: I intend (with notice) to set the power of R2324 to 1.
You mean, to cause it to set its own power to 1?
You didn't warn *me* like that!
G. wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I submit the following AI-1 proposal Out with the Dictator 1:
{{
Repeal Rule 2324.
[This is ineffective if the purported escalations worked.]
}}
I submit the following AI-3 proposal Out with the Dictator 3:
{{
Repeal Rule 2324.
}}
16 matches
Mail list logo
