On Sat, 2017-07-22 at 15:39 +, Quazie wrote:
> While you're at it - bankruptcy sucks - being unable to work at all
> with organizations for long periods of time is a pretty intense
> punishment.
Hasn't your Lockout ended already? I thought it did, fairly recently.
So in this case, the Lockout
I would recommend lowering it to one month and see how that goes.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 22, 2017, at 2:44 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> It's currently at 90 days (Rule 2457).
>
> -Aris
>
>
>
It's currently at 90 days (Rule 2457).
-Aris
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I’d be in favour of reducing it from a month to a week or two. I’m
> especially sympathetic to your case, as your original action that lead to
> your bankruptcy could easily
I’d be in favour of reducing it from a month to a week or two. I’m especially
sympathetic to your case, as your original action that lead to your bankruptcy
could easily have been entirely ineffective, and therefore harmless.
-o
> On Jul 22, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Quazie
While you're at it - bankruptcy sucks - being unable to work at all with
organizations for long periods of time is a pretty intense punishment.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 14:58 Nic Evans wrote:
> If I can, I withdraw the proposal "Less Strict Faking". Thank you and
> sorry to
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:53 PM, grok (caleb vines)
wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 20, 2017 10:02 PM, "Alex Smith" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:52 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> > On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >
Actually, this proposal is seriously flawed. A person can always claim
to have believed that something they tried (however unreasonably), and
honest players like G. get caught in the crossfire when they do things
they're unsure of. A better way to do this is a reasonable person
standard (complain
On Jul 20, 2017 10:02 PM, "Alex Smith" wrote:
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:52 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > ibonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I pend this for the minimum allowable amount.
>
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 11:02 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:52 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>> On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> ibonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I pend this for the minimum allowable
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:52 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > ibonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I pend this for the minimum allowable amount.
>
> As the proposal’s imminence had already been flipped to Pending by
>
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> I pend this for the minimum allowable amount.
As the proposal’s imminence had already been flipped to Pending by V.J Rada, I
believe that this fails and will record that you
I think Less Strict Faking by nichdel would probably end the game as we
know it but Less Strict Faking by nichdel is the only thing that can save
it imo.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, grok (caleb vines)
wrote:
> I got yours, I just didn't wanna say anything because I
I got yours, I just didn't wanna say anything because I thought it might be
funny
-grok
On Jul 20, 2017 8:09 PM, "V.J Rada" wrote:
I already did this. Did my message not send?
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
I already did this. Did my message not send?
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I pend this for the minimum allowable amount.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
On 07/20/17 19:07, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> Amend R2471 (No Faking) to read:
>>>
>>> A person SHALL NOT attempt to perform an action which e does not believe
>>> to be possible so as to deceive others.
> What's the standard for
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > Amend R2471 (No Faking) to read:
> >
> > A person SHALL NOT attempt to perform an action which e does not believe
> > to be possible so as to deceive others.
What's the standard for belief. Like, if I'm 50/50 "eh, this might or
16 matches
Mail list logo