Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-22 Thread Alex Smith
On Sat, 2017-07-22 at 15:39 +, Quazie wrote: > While you're at it - bankruptcy sucks - being unable to work at all > with organizations for long periods of time is a pretty intense > punishment. Hasn't your Lockout ended already? I thought it did, fairly recently. So in this case, the Lockout

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-22 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I would recommend lowering it to one month and see how that goes. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jul 22, 2017, at 2:44 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > It's currently at 90 days (Rule 2457). > > -Aris > > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-22 Thread Aris Merchant
It's currently at 90 days (Rule 2457). -Aris On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > I’d be in favour of reducing it from a month to a week or two. I’m > especially sympathetic to your case, as your original action that lead to > your bankruptcy could easily

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-22 Thread Owen Jacobson
I’d be in favour of reducing it from a month to a week or two. I’m especially sympathetic to your case, as your original action that lead to your bankruptcy could easily have been entirely ineffective, and therefore harmless. -o > On Jul 22, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Quazie

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-22 Thread Quazie
While you're at it - bankruptcy sucks - being unable to work at all with organizations for long periods of time is a pretty intense punishment. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 14:58 Nic Evans wrote: > If I can, I withdraw the proposal "Less Strict Faking". Thank you and > sorry to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-21 Thread grok (caleb vines)
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:53 PM, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > > > On Jul 20, 2017 10:02 PM, "Alex Smith" wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:52 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> > On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread Aris Merchant
Actually, this proposal is seriously flawed. A person can always claim to have believed that something they tried (however unreasonably), and honest players like G. get caught in the crossfire when they do things they're unsure of. A better way to do this is a reasonable person standard (complain

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread grok (caleb vines)
On Jul 20, 2017 10:02 PM, "Alex Smith" wrote: On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:52 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > ibonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > I pend this for the minimum allowable amount. >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 11:02 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:52 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> ibonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I pend this for the minimum allowable

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread Alex Smith
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:52 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > ibonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > I pend this for the minimum allowable amount. > > As the proposal’s imminence had already been flipped to Pending by >

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > I pend this for the minimum allowable amount. As the proposal’s imminence had already been flipped to Pending by V.J Rada, I believe that this fails and will record that you

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread V.J Rada
I think Less Strict Faking by nichdel would probably end the game as we know it but Less Strict Faking by nichdel is the only thing that can save it imo. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > I got yours, I just didn't wanna say anything because I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread grok (caleb vines)
I got yours, I just didn't wanna say anything because I thought it might be funny -grok On Jul 20, 2017 8:09 PM, "V.J Rada" wrote: I already did this. Did my message not send? On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread V.J Rada
I already did this. Did my message not send? On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I pend this for the minimum allowable amount. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread Nic Evans
On 07/20/17 19:07, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >>> Amend R2471 (No Faking) to read: >>> >>> A person SHALL NOT attempt to perform an action which e does not believe >>> to be possible so as to deceive others. > What's the standard for

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Less Strict Faking

2017-07-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > Amend R2471 (No Faking) to read: > > > > A person SHALL NOT attempt to perform an action which e does not believe > > to be possible so as to deceive others. What's the standard for belief. Like, if I'm 50/50 "eh, this might or