> On Oct 11, 2017, at 11:19 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:17 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>
>>> As Secretary, I flip the Floating Value to 20.
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:29 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>
>>> As Secretary, I
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:17 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
As Secretary, I flip the Floating Value to 20.
On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:29 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
As Secretary, I flip the Floating Value to 22.
On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:54 AM, Owen Jacobson wro
No it wasn't: you might have missed the secretary's revision last
week, which came a couple of days after eir first report.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> CoE: The previous floating value was 132 and V.J. Rada paid 26 shinies for
> eir stamp.
>
>
> On 10
When you purchased this, the floating value was still 132.
On 10/11/2017 12:21 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
I buy a stamp.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
As Secretary, I flip the Floating Value to 20.
Secretary's Weekly Report
Date of this report: Wed, 11 Oct 2017
Date of last
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:47 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> PF
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 3:46 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>> CoE: Between your last report and this one, I bought a stamp from
>> Agora. I'm COEing bc obviously that would change the values again.
This mechanism is _shockingly_ brittle. Let’
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:07 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> If I have a stamp, depending on the gamestate, I destroy a stamp, gaining 27
> shinies.
According to my records, after the resolution of CFJ 3561, you did have a stamp.
-o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 12:27 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> how do i have so many? I had 63 last week, spent a lot, and don't
> remember a big payday.
It appears that I accidentally counted this transaction
On Sep 26, 2017, at 12:53 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I have like 62 I think? I give Agora 20 shinies
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 21:52 Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:35 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> >
> > Nevermind, I think I had sent that when I didn't understand pf and
> such. Your report is just fine. I retract my CoE (if that's possible, idk
> if it is)
>
> It’s not. However, I could
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:35 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> Nevermind, I think I had sent that when I didn't understand pf and such.
> Your report is just fine. I retract my CoE (if that's possible, idk if it is)
It’s not. However, I could deny this CoE, though, and common convention is to
deny a C
CoE: A while back I paid Agora 17 shinies, in response to a request someone
made for everyone to give 1/3 of their shinies to Agora. I don't see this
in the report.
(Or, did I send that to the wrong forum?)
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, VJ Rada w
Also don't forget your empty agronomist report this week!
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:27 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> how do i have so many? I had 63 last week, spent a lot, and don't
> remember a big payday.
>
> I destroy my stamp, getting 27 shinies. I transfer 13 shinies to the
> Community Chest.
>
> On
I see. I forgot about that actually. Carry on.
天火狐
On Sep 26, 2017 21:15, "Owen Jacobson" wrote:
>
> > On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Josh T wrote:
> >
> > I haven't been credited with it, so I assumed it has failed, since my 1
> stamp is from August.
> >
> > 天火狐
>
> I have two records for this
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Josh T wrote:
>
> I haven't been credited with it, so I assumed it has failed, since my 1 stamp
> is from August.
>
> 天火狐
I have two records for this:
2017-08-23 ! 天火狐 created a stamp
2017-09-08 ! 天火狐 created a stamp
However, you lost one to Gaelan’s stamp-de
I haven't been credited with it, so I assumed it has failed, since my 1
stamp is from August.
天火狐
On 26 September 2017 at 10:14, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:46 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I purchase a stam
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:46 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> I purchase a stamp for 1 shiny.
You last created a Stamp on Sept. 4th, which is within the same Agoran Month as
this attempt. I _think_ this was ineffective:
> Once per month, a player MAY [sic], by announcement, tra
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 12:10 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 23:59 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> As Secretary, I destroy the organization “Agoran Betting Market”, as
>> its Income is below the Income Floor of 50.
>>
>> If anyone feels like reinstating it, its final charter is re
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 23:59 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> As Secretary, I destroy the organization “Agoran Betting Market”, as
> its Income is below the Income Floor of 50.
>
> If anyone feels like reinstating it, its final charter is reproduced
> below.
About time too, I guess; its charter was b
Oy Owen, that same argument can be given to anyone who has set the Agora
Balance to below 50.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:47 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Personally I don't care. Cuddlebeam is fine to keep it if e wants.
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> >
> >> On Sep 12, 2017,
Personally I don't care. Cuddlebeam is fine to keep it if e wants.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:20 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>>
>> I cause myself to receive a welcome package
>
> For obvious reasons, I believe this actually failed.
>
> However, I als
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:20 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> I cause myself to receive a welcome package
For obvious reasons, I believe this actually failed.
However, I also believe it nominally failed, even if the rules were as they
should have been. CuddleBeam’s, ah, creative application of rules 869
I’m sorry, why does it sudden;y become a problem, when you aren’t benefitting
from it.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:24 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> Formal CoE: This report is a tissue of lies.
>
> If we aren't fixing it by ratific
We are fixing it by ratification this week (or at least the floating value,
see G.'s RWO), and the fix proposal has been distributed. It's only a
matter of time before someone does the "fix everything" ratification too. I
recommend that this CoE be denied (note that that would not actually
violate
You can't, there's no money left (would what I have done succeeded)
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:20 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I cause myself to receive a welcome package
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > As Secretary, I flip the Floating Value to 114.
> >
> > This week:
> >
JK JK I don't.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:20 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I cause myself to receive a welcome package
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> As Secretary, I flip the Floating Value to 114.
>>
>> This week:
>>
>> * Pending a proposal costs 1 AP or 6 sh.
>> * Calling f
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2017, at 1:20 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>>
On Aug 17, 2017, at 1:17 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Secretary's Weekly Report
Balances:
On Aug 17, 2017, at 1:20 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2017, at 1:17 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>>
>>> Secretary's Weekly Report
>>>
>>> Balances:
>>>
>>> 85 Shinies Agora
>>
>> As Secretary, I flip the Floating
On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 00:34 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Nic Evans wrote:
> > Real idea: Ratify the Ruleset every Read the Ruleset Week.
> Seconded.
I like this idea, but it should be a tradition that we do so via
proposal, as opposed to something automatic in the ru
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
> On 07/27/2017 08:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>> I note that GII disturbingly requires the SLR to be _accurate_ for any of
>> the actions to happen. What's the likelihood of that, when (according to
>> itself) it hasn't been ratified in 3 yea
On 07/27/2017 08:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
I note that GII disturbingly requires the SLR to be _accurate_ for any
of the actions to happen. What's the likelihood of that, when
(according to itself) it hasn't been ratified in 3 years...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
Real idea: Ratify the Ruleset ever
Surely it should be presumed accurate until somebody finds an inaccuracy
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>>>
>>> CoE: Gaelan paid me 2 shinies (through GII, when I published the
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On Jul 26, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
CoE: Gaelan paid me 2 shinies (through GII, when I published the Rulekeepor
report).
Note the report’s effective date. (Sorry - I was out of town on short
notice.) That payment will appear in this week’
> On Jul 26, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
> CoE: Gaelan paid me 2 shinies (through GII, when I published the Rulekeepor
> report).
Note the report’s effective date. (Sorry - I was out of town on short notice.)
That payment will appear in this week’s report.
-o
signature.asc
Descri
You're gonna break that pledge, aren't you?
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 20:23 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Secretary's Weekly Report
>
> I pledge that I SHALL NOT deny any CoE concerning this alleged report.
>
> I note that I do NOT give any willful consent to
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 20:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > This logic (the Secretary's Report can only be published by the
> > Secretary) would still break the whole purpose of allowing anyone to
> > do it in times when the Secretary is uncertain, I think.
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 20:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> This logic (the Secretary's Report can only be published by the
> Secretary) would still break the whole purpose of allowing anyone to
> do it in times when the Secretary is uncertain, I think.
Well, you could do it via RWO if you know that
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 18:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > there's at least one error in it. Thus, in order to block ratification,
> > > I picked the mistake in the report that was a) most clearly a mistake,
Unless "e SHALL either impose summary judgement on a player" means he must
only do it to one player to be absolved of this rule.
The card rules are badly written.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:51 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
> Fun fact about cards "
>
> As part of the Referee's weekly duties, e SHALL
Fun fact about cards "
As part of the Referee's weekly duties, e SHALL either impose
Summary Judgment on a player or truthfully announce that e
believes that there are no rules violations in the preceding
Agoran week for which a Card has not already been issued."
conflicts
On Jun 15, 2017, at 7:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 07:49 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Secretary's Weekly Report
>>
>> Just to make absolutely sure:
>>
>> CoE: You are not the Secretary.
>
> C'mon now. You just said yourself that t
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> there's at least one error in it. Thus, in order to block ratification,
> I picked the mistake in the report that was a) most clearly a mistake,
> and b) hardest for you to correct.
But I don't need to correct that for this particular self-ratification
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 16:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 07:49 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > Secretary's Weekly Report
> >
> > Just to make absolutely sure:
> >
> > CoE: You are not the Secretary.
>
> C'mon now. You just said
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 07:49 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Secretary's Weekly Report
>
> Just to make absolutely sure:
>
> CoE: You are not the Secretary.
C'mon now. You just said yourself that the rule was designed so that
anyone could do it. CoEing t
Gameplay note:
On Jun 14, 2017, at 3:23 AM, Quazie wrote:
> COE - I paid 30 shinies to pend my 5 oroposals
In the interests of friendliness and expedience, I choose to interpret
> For each proposal submitted above, of which there are 5, I N shinies to Agora
> to pend the proposal, where N is
43 matches
Mail list logo
