Trigon wrote:
By the way, I found the Kingmaking thread which pushed me over 1000
coins. Thanks, I guess, but I'm really not sure why it was done. I can't
find much commentary about it in the Reportor's summaries or the mailing
lists themselves.
Oh, because I was expecting coins to be repeal
On 4/26/2020 8:26 AM, ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 22:30 -0400, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 16:55, ais523 wrote:
>>> Experience from BlogNomic is that many players apparently value
>>> causing a win to happen, even if it's some other player that
>>> actually gets the win
On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 22:30 -0400, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 16:55, ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > Experience from BlogNomic is that many players apparently value
> > causing a win to happen, even if it's some other
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 16:55, ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 14:53 -0600, Reuben Staley via agora-business
> wrote:
> > The following is a Notice of Honour:
> >
> > +1 PSS for reporting for Treasuror.
> > -1 twg for leaving without res
On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 14:53 -0600, Reuben Staley via agora-business
wrote:
> The following is a Notice of Honour:
>
> +1 PSS for reporting for Treasuror.
> -1 twg for leaving without resigning (I guess).
>
> By the way, I found the Kingmaking thread which pushed me over 1000
> coins. Thanks, I g
So it is, thank you - I marked all the zombie auction stuff as "uncertain,
revisit later" and never did. Revision forthcoming.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, February 14, 2020 7:18 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> Also missing my transfer from o:
> https://mailman
Jason wrote:
> CoE: this leaves out he Payday coins.
Sorry. I even remembered it, just confused it with the broken things.
Roll on Friday morning.
-twg
G. wrote:
> CoE on coin balances: missing blackjack payments?
Oh yes. Somehow it didn't register with me that those were actual game
actions. :P
Revision forthcoming.
-twg
On 1/11/2020 8:08 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
Speaking of which, did the proposal that authorized D. Margaux's victory
actually do that? The rules at the moment don't seem to allow victory by
proposal, nor are victories self-ratifying any more.
FWIW we did ratify the Scroll a
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 21:30, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
> >
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
> >
> >> I suppose. I was considering keeping them to try to bribe people, but
> >> since they're pretty useless, that w
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 14:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
> >
> >> I suppose. I was considering keeping them to try to bribe people, but
> >> since
On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
>
>> I suppose. I was considering keeping them to try to bribe people, but
>> since they're pretty useless, that would be pointless. I perform the
>> following action 18 times: { If I have more than 1000
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I suppose. I was considering keeping them to try to bribe people, but
> since they're pretty useless, that would be pointless. I perform the
> following action 18 times: { If I have more than 1000
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 23:39, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, November 26, 2019 8:25 PM, James Cook
> wrote:
> > 10Jacob Arduino
>
> CoE: Jacob Arduino has no coins because e is no longer a player.
Thanks. I'll publish a revision soon.
> I intend without objection to declare
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 04:40, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 8/26/19 10:38 PM, James Cook wrote:
> >
> >Forbes 500
> >
> >
> > Da
On behalf of tar I transfer 20 coins to R. Lee
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 2:24 PM James Cook wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 23:35, Rebecca wrote:
> > I also transfer tar's 20 coins to myself
>
> Does this work?
>
> R2466 requires that you "must, in the message in which the action is
> performed, un
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 23:35, Rebecca wrote:
> I also transfer tar's 20 coins to myself
Does this work?
R2466 requires that you "must, in the message in which the action is
performed, uniquely identify the principal and that the action is
being taken on behalf of that person."
Specifically, you
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 20:48, Rance Bedwell wrote:
> If you want me to, I will attempt to withdraw the COE.
That might make things more interesting, since I don't see a way for
you to do it. I might still be able to deny it under Rule 2201; I'm
not sure. I don't think it's causing much harm.
I'm
You have persuaded me at least. Also, in this case I chose to send the second
email. But if the duplicate email resulted from a technical glitch with no
conscious decision involved, it certainly wouldn't seem right or a common sense
interpretation to penalize the person.
In addition to the
I vaguely seem to recall that there is precedent that payments for
something fail entirely if it's impossible for them to achieve that
something.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Thu, 30 May 2019, James Cook wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 03:34, Rance Bedwell wrote:
I make a COE for this Treasuror's r
On 3/5/2019 6:14 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I respond to the CoE by citing the CFJ.
(I swear I remember there being a proto floating around at some point to
change it so that just the existence of a relevant open CFJ would block
self-ratification
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I respond to the CoE by citing the CFJ.
(I swear I remember there being a proto floating around at some point to
change it so that just the existence of a relevant open CFJ would block
self-ratification, instead of having to go through this rigmaro
Oh don't worry about me, it's the only vaguely controversial thing that's
happened so far this week so it's pretty easy to keep track of in my head. If
it was actually too confusing I'd be docking karma from you myself. :P
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 9:06 PM
Seems like the solution here is to define (in a rule) “by announcement,
stating…” as requiring the “stating” bit to be part of the public message.
Gaelan
> On Mar 5, 2019, at 12:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> CFJ, barring twg: G. has earned 5 coins for the Herald's Report of
> 17-Feb-2019.
>
> On Mar 5, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> Yes, I don't see how this is any different from "stating it to yourself".
> Your publication of the hash (if it even is a hash - I see no evidence that
> it's not just a random string of hexadecimal digits) didn't meaningfully
> com
In that message, you didn’t state a number of coins; you stated a hash. Stating
a hash is different from stating that-which-was-hashed, I think, at least when
the hash cannot readily be decrypted by those to whom the statement is
directed.
If you said the hash out loud to yourself, or “stated
I was starting to be concerned tbh lol.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:32 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 2/18/2019 12:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada
> dada
> > dada...
>
> (that dada thing was meant to be silly, not angry - i realized
Kinky.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:33 PM D. Margaux wrote:
> I point my toes at G. and cuddle beam for Faking.
>
> > On Feb 18, 2019, at 3:31 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> >
> > maah uyntz asee as myself and sunt Dictatorship, also, the game is now
> > Ossified and nobody can perform any game actions,
On 2/18/2019 12:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada
dada...
(that dada thing was meant to be silly, not angry - i realized afterwards
that it sounded kinda shouty like what the dadaists did - sorry).
> On 2/18/2019 11:41 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>> I did miss that, yes, but even now I see it I'm not at all clear that it
>> works - seems to be a case of ISIDTID.
>>
>> For comparison, I state whatever is necessary to publish a revision to
>> the below-referenced report.
Here's a a more ca
No, I disagree. The point is that quang was a definition in the Agoran
dialect, the same as if the relevant verb had been defined in standard
English (we’ve never made a specific ruling on linguistic acceptability,
beyond the comprehension of the players). Here, you’re just saying
something and exp
Oh ok, will fix
~Corona
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> CoE: Still off I'm afraid. Zombies should get the May salary (that
> includes
> 3 Incs) but not the initial 5. (then some people transferred the Incs from
> their zombies to themselves when they transferred 'all
On Fri, 4 May 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> CoE: This report misses that 3 incense were added to Paydays before the May 1
> payday (Proposal 8040).
(also, 天火狐 was a zombie when that proposal passed so shouldn't have gotten
the 5).
34 matches
Mail list logo