Re: Re: Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

>Please tone down the language a wee bit, we like to pretend to be >genteel. (I'm not saying nichdel wasn't overly snarky emself; this is a >de-escalation request all around). Yeah I re-read my thing and found it to be more intense than it should be lol. Sorry about that.

Re: Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

On Mon, 29 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote: > But yeah. Don't fucking toss me an ad hominem. I'll gladly re-process > the ideas and re-present it again. Please tone down the language a wee bit, we like to pretend to be genteel. (I'm not saying nichdel wasn't overly snarky emself; this is a

Re: Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

>This response makes me think you didn't read or comprehend my response. This is a really intense claim, but I'll restate my response again, but breaking down your exact reply instead of making certain assumptions which I thought were obvious from dialogue. I believe this is the "practical"

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

Ok, here's the longer deal on unregulated actions. The rules neither take from, nor add to, your ability to perform unregulated actions. For this, CFJs 2149 and 2150 are instructive. From those two cases: "Celebrating" is unregulated. Can you celebrate something by announcement? Sure! By

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

This response makes me think you didn't read or comprehend my response. And your recent behavior makes me think you don't attempt to comprehend the rules before acting. On May 29, 2017 10:35, "CuddleBeam" wrote: > >The rules allow withdrawing ballots and proposals

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

>The rules allow withdrawing ballots and proposals explicitly, and explicitly mention what happens, so under those conditions it's clearly regulated. I disagree. An action is regulated if: * (1) the Rules limit, allow, enable, or permit its performance - There is no limitation, permission or

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

>Although I do think grok's "If I am still an objector, but my objection >has been withdrawn [by someone else], can I withdraw my objection?" is >a valid question. We don't even have a mechanic to *withdraw* in the first place. If you can pull out of the ether that you can "withdraw", I believe

Re: Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

@Aris: Thank you for putting into words what I had been thinking while reading over those of CuddleBeam's messages. 天火狐 On 28 May 2017 at 21:51, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 6:39 PM, CuddleBeam > wrote: > >

Re: Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 6:39 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: > Arguably, you can paint your objection blue too. Or dress it as Superman. > > Unregulated actions are weird. No one seems to understand what unregulated means. All it means is that the rules can't say that an action

Re: Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

On Mon, 29 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote: > >Interesting question: If am still an objector, but my objection has been > >withdrawn, can I withdraw my my objection? > Arguably, you can paint your objection blue too. Or dress it as Superman. > > Unregulated actions are weird. It does concern me

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

On Sun, 28 May 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > Interesting question: If am still an objector, but my objection > has been withdrawn, can I withdraw my my objection? FOO!

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

On Sun, 28 May 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 29 May 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: Note that only withdrawals by the Objector emself count. Greetings, Ørjan. snap! I feel so redundant. Also, still waiting for you to snap and use the term ISIDTID. Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

On Mon, 29 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote: > Cool. I think I'll just tell anyway. I'm not too overly interested in the > subterfuge of it all. I just care mostly about confirming that it *would* > work, > that's good enough trophy for me. > "Withdrawing" isn't a regulated action apparently (note

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

On May 28, 2017 8:30 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote: On Mon, 29 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote: > Cool. I think I'll just tell anyway. I'm not too overly interested in the subterfuge of it all. I just care mostly about confirming that it *would* work, > that's good enough trophy

Re: Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

>From rule 2124: > An Objector to > a dependent action is an eligible entity who has publicly posted > (and not withdrawn) an objection to the announcement of intent > to perform the action. Ah, dangit, that verb conjugation. So subtle. I guess it would've worked if it was

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

On Mon, 29 May 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > Note that only withdrawals by the Objector emself count. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. snap!

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

On Mon, 29 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote: So I can just do the unregulated action of "I withdraw your objection" (would my proof of "all actions are regulation actions or not actions" not work) From rule 2124: An Objector to a

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer is a humble agoran farmer

Cool. I think I'll just tell anyway. I'm not too overly interested in the subterfuge of it all. I just care mostly about confirming that it *would* work, that's good enough trophy for me. "Withdrawing" isn't a regulated action apparently (note that I, as the initiator, am not required to track