Re: +1 maintenance report

Hi Seb, On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:01:32PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Hey Robie, your email was interesting to read, I've one question bellow > > Le 05/12/2022 à 18:04, Robie Basak a écrit : > > I thought I recalled a > >colleague mentioning something about t

+1 maintenance report

Unfortunately due to interrupts and illness I didn't manage to get much actual +1 maintenance done in my shift last week. Another big factor was that I chose to focus deeply on obscure autopkgtest failures to a depth I've not done before. This, together with some waiting on some very long queues,

Re: libsdl-ttf

Hi Norbert, On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 05:00:09PM +0100, Norbert de Jonge wrote: > Any chance you can update package libsdl-ttf. > It's more than 10 years old now. > (With source package file SDL_ttf.c, even for "Jammy" (22.04LTS), being > dated Jan 15 2012.) Are you looking for libsdl2-ttf? This

Re: Updated parameter

Hi Dan, On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:09:40PM +, Dan Moore wrote: > I don't think a server OS should suspend when closing the laptop lid.   > I'd like /etc/systemd/logind.conf to have HandleLidSwitch=ignore in the > Ubuntu Server installation media.   Unfortunately this is not trivial to

Re: Extended call for Ubuntu Technical Board candidates

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 07:07:26PM +, Torsten Franz wrote: > In > order to make a good decision in this selection, we would like to give the > candidates the opportunity to introduce themselves here and to say a few >

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1998119] [NEW] queues.json returns bad Content-Type

Public bug reported: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/queues.json returns "content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8" instead of application/json like https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/static/running.json does. Both URLs are linked from the front page. This breaks my browser's built in JSON handling and

~ubuntu-server subscription changes

The following subscriptions are missing: dacite pcs python-tornado ruby-childprocess ruby-daemons ruby-ethon ruby-eventmachine ruby-ffi ruby-json ruby-mime-types ruby-mime-types-data ruby-mustermann ruby-rack ruby-ruby2-keywords ruby-sinatra ruby-tilt thin Missing

~ubuntu-server subscription changes

The following subscriptions are missing: ruby-sdbm Missing subscriptions added -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

~ubuntu-server subscription changes

The following subscriptions are superfluous: ruby-sdbm Superfluous subscriptions removed -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Monday triage report

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 02:51:03PM -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote: > Showing comments belonging to the Server category, updated between 2022-11-18 > (Friday) and 2022-11-20 (Sunday) inclusive > Service - Kerberos with O… [Andreas Hasenack] > (https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/15356) > └─ +82056

Re: Friday Bug and Doc Triage

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:53:25PM -0700, Lena Voytek wrote: > LP: #1996846 > - > tftp-hpa - tftpd-hpa refuses to start if ipv6 is disabled > User requested a change in functionality, recommended filing a report > upstream. This

Re: Cron ~/oem-meta-packageset-sync/oem-meta-packageset-sync

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:12:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > DMB is only on Cc:, but they appear to own this code. > > origin > https://git.launchpad.net/~developer-membership-board/+git/oem-meta-packageset-sync > (fetch) Documentation here:

Re: Tomcat9 - Ubuntu 20.04 x64

Hi, On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:00:22PM +, Brad Turnbough wrote: > Ran a nessus scan against the box and am being told that verion 9.0.31 is > vulnerable to a DoS attack and that I need to upgrade to >=9.0.36. Problem > is, that version isn't available in the Ubuntu repos. > > Can someone

Bug#1024016: mysql-8.0: CVE-2022-39400 CVE-2022-39402 CVE-2022-39403 CVE-2022-39408 CVE-2022-39410 CVE-2022-21594 CVE-2022-21599 CVE-2022-21604 CVE-2022-21608 CVE-2022-21611 CVE-2022-21617 CVE-2022-21

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 08:31:24PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > The following vulnerabilities were published for mysql-8.0. FTR, an update to 8.0.31 to fix these is already prepared and being tested at https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mysql/-/merge_requests/65 signature.asc

Bug#1024016: mysql-8.0: CVE-2022-39400 CVE-2022-39402 CVE-2022-39403 CVE-2022-39408 CVE-2022-39410 CVE-2022-21594 CVE-2022-21599 CVE-2022-21604 CVE-2022-21608 CVE-2022-21611 CVE-2022-21617 CVE-2022-21

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 08:31:24PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > The following vulnerabilities were published for mysql-8.0. FTR, an update to 8.0.31 to fix these is already prepared and being tested at https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mysql/-/merge_requests/65 signature.asc

Bug#1022994: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 13, Robie Basak wrote: > > > This seems inconsistent to me. Where is the expectation that TMPDIR must > > be unset if dropping privileges coming from? Obviously for users of > Where is the expectation tha

Re: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 13, Robie Basak wrote: > > > This seems inconsistent to me. Where is the expectation that TMPDIR must > > be unset if dropping privileges coming from? Obviously for users of > Where is the expectation tha

Bug#1022994: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 04:16:29PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > And I think that it would be wrong to have dpkg generally unset $TMPDIR, > because if root sets it then it would be reasonable to expect that also > dpkg and the maintainer scripts use it (as long as they are not dropping >

Re: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 04:16:29PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > And I think that it would be wrong to have dpkg generally unset $TMPDIR, > because if root sets it then it would be reasonable to expect that also > dpkg and the maintainer scripts use it (as long as they are not dropping >

Bug#1022994: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 02:58:47PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > If the maintainer script is *dropping* privileges from root down to a > system user, then I think the maintainer script is/should be responsible > for doing that privilege drop in a way that works... Agreed, but amongst various

Re: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 02:58:47PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > If the maintainer script is *dropping* privileges from root down to a > system user, then I think the maintainer script is/should be responsible > for doing that privilege drop in a way that works... Agreed, but amongst various

Bug#1022994: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 02:21:58AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 12, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > Instead of manually trying to manage TMPDIR env variable in various > > places, we should have a standardized way to run maintainer scripts in > > clean shell sessions that have all env

Re: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 02:21:58AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 12, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > Instead of manually trying to manage TMPDIR env variable in various > > places, we should have a standardized way to run maintainer scripts in > > clean shell sessions that have all env

Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:46:55PM +, brian m. carlson wrote: > > I think it's more wide than that: If you change UID, you need to > > sanitise the environment. Your HOME is likely to be wrong. PATH might > > very well be pointing at directories which are not appropriate for the > > user

Re: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:46:55PM +, brian m. carlson wrote: > > I think it's more wide than that: If you change UID, you need to > > sanitise the environment. Your HOME is likely to be wrong. PATH might > > very well be pointing at directories which are not appropriate for the > > user

Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 05:37:53PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > I think it's more wide than that: If you change UID, you need to > sanitise the environment. Your HOME is likely to be wrong. PATH might > very well be pointing at directories which are not appropriate for the > user you're

Re: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 05:37:53PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > I think it's more wide than that: If you change UID, you need to > sanitise the environment. Your HOME is likely to be wrong. PATH might > very well be pointing at directories which are not appropriate for the > user you're

Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:08:55PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > But are you in essence saying that libpam-tmpdir requires that *every > > maintainer script* that runs things as non-root, or starts processes > > that do that, unset TMPDIR first? > This would not be right, because it is totally

Re: Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:08:55PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > But are you in essence saying that libpam-tmpdir requires that *every > > maintainer script* that runs things as non-root, or starts processes > > that do that, unset TMPDIR first? > This would not be right, because it is totally

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987631] Re: Screencast only records one second

Possibly fixed in jammy-proposed with bug 1996148. If this fixes this for you, please let us know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987631 Title: Screencast only

[Bug 1987631] Re: Screencast only records one second

Possibly fixed in jammy-proposed with bug 1996148. If this fixes this for you, please let us know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987631 Title: Screencast

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1985057] Re: Camera output freeze when using pipewiresrc

Thanks. I accepted the upload but changed the bug reference to point to bug 1996148 instead, since landing the revert shouldn't close this bug. I'll reopen this bug since the revert reverts it. ** Changed in: pipewire (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996148] [NEW] pipewire update to 0.3.48-1ubuntu2 resulted in regressions

Public bug reported: The SRU in bug 1985057 resulted in regression reports, including bug 1987631, currently marked as duplicates bug 1993912 and bug 1995358, and possibly bug 1994928. It's clear that we need to revert, but I don't want the metadata to close all of those regression bugs since it

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996148] Please test proposed package

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected, Accepted pipewire into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/0.3.48-1ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1996148] [NEW] pipewire update to 0.3.48-1ubuntu2 resulted in regressions

Public bug reported: The SRU in bug 1985057 resulted in regression reports, including bug 1987631, currently marked as duplicates bug 1993912 and bug 1995358, and possibly bug 1994928. It's clear that we need to revert, but I don't want the metadata to close all of those regression bugs since it

[Bug 1996148] Please test proposed package

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected, Accepted pipewire into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/0.3.48-1ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

Thank you for the report. Adding debian-devel@ and the libpam-tmpdir maintainer for wider discussion. On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:54:34AM +, brian m. carlson wrote: > On my systems, I use libpam-tmpdir, which provides each user with a > private temporary directory owned and accessible only by

Bug#1023778: TMPDIR behaviour in maintainer scripts [was: Re: Bug#1023778: mysql-server-8.0: fails to restart on upgrade with libpam-tmpdir]

Thank you for the report. Adding debian-devel@ and the libpam-tmpdir maintainer for wider discussion. On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:54:34AM +, brian m. carlson wrote: > On my systems, I use libpam-tmpdir, which provides each user with a > private temporary directory owned and accessible only by

Re: Podman update?

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 11:40:21PM +, Christian Bourque wrote: > Are there any plans to update the Podman package to the latest release > since it's now an official package of Ubuntu 22.04? Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates for our policies on bumping major versions in a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1995606] Re: Upgrade thermald to 2.5.1

Thank you for the re-upload. I think this remains blocked on answers to my questions in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- release/2022-October/005495.html ? ** Changed in: thermald (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1981087] Re: thermald prematurely throttling GPU

This SRU remains blocked on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- release/2022-October/005495.html. For a straight backport to Jammy, if that is the conclusion, then the upload also needs an SRU meta-bug really to document the justification and regression risk mitigation for the backport. **

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987631] Re: Screencast only records one second

@vanvugt what about pipewire in Jammy? Based on the duplicate report, isn't this a regression in Jammy? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987631 Title: Screencast

[Bug 1987631] Re: Screencast only records one second

@vanvugt what about pipewire in Jammy? Based on the duplicate report, isn't this a regression in Jammy? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987631 Title:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987631] Re: Screencast only records one second

regression-updates based on duplicate report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/1995358 ** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1987631] Re: Screencast only records one second

regression-updates based on duplicate report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/1995358 ** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

Bug triage report for 2022-10-31 (Monday triage)

> Bugs last updated between 2022-10-28 (Friday) and 2022-10-30 (Sunday) > inclusive > Date range identified as: "Monday triage" > LP: #1976110 - Triaged [tmux] - `tmux -d -x ... -y > ...` does not respect sizing Utkarsh hasn't managed to get to this yet. Pinged him and

[Enterprise-support] [Bug 1995170] Re: server doesnt restart after crash

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This sort of change would be appropriate to apply by policy change across the entire archive, after deliberation across relevant developers to understand if this is appropriate as a whole, rather than piece by

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995157] Re: Permission Denied while using lates verions of Openssh client

Thank you for taking the time to file this report and helping to make Ubuntu better. I think you're probably affected by this: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1409105/ubuntu-22-04-ssh-the-rsa-key- isnt-working-since-upgrading-from-20-04 Since it seems likely to me that this is a local

Re: Apologies

On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:00:14PM +, Robie Basak wrote: > I won't be able to attend our meeting tomorrow due to a company event. Copy and paste fail. I meant Tuesday. signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com ht

Apologies

I won't be able to attend our meeting tomorrow due to a company event. signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board

Re: python3 cryptography package unavailable

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 09:42:54AM +, Mathew Subin wrote: > The following dependency is not working / available > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/python3-cryptography > > > * python3-cffi-backend-api-max (>= 9729) > Package not available > > * python3-cffi-backend-api-min (<=

Re: Req: thermald special case

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:58:36AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Christopher James Halse Rogers kirjoitti 28.9.2022 klo 10.07: > >It's not entirely clear to me what you want to do here. > > > >If you need to fix some bugs in Jammy, and updating to thermald 2.5.0 is > >basically the same as

Re: libapache2-mod-xsendfile packaging inconsistency

Hi, On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:49:00PM +1300, GJB wrote: > this module is packaged with a binary built by the following source linked > on this page I'm not sure exactly what you're asking, but you can see the sources used to build libapache2-mod-xsendfile for Ubuntu 22.04 (Jammy) here:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987678] Re: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic

Is there a specific user story that you're looking to fix here? Eg. crash reports in specific apps? What are you planning to rebuild to use the newly versioned symbols? If possible, I'd like to see these verified in proposed at the same time. On the specific fix, there is quite a bit of noise

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Thank you for contributing this fix! This looks fine; just one comment. Upstream adds a test. But it looks to me like it won't run because the quilt patch can't handle the executable bit. Looks like there's a workaround in debian/tests/control for another case of the same issue. Please could you

Re: Changes to the TB meeting schedule

kipping November 1. > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 12:30:08PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure you're aware that Steve's availability to attend TB meetings is > > limited at the moment. He's offline at the moment, and needs the meeting > >

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1991592] Re: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port configuration from sshd_config

On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 02:34:40PM -, Corey Reichle wrote: > > Socket activation provides a smoother (runtime) UX for users > > SSHD configuration is not a user issue, but a systems administration > issue. Maybe, but more important is the UX for users of ssh clients who aren't trying to

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1991592] Re: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port configuration from sshd_config

On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:04:05PM -, Corey Reichle wrote: > If the point is to increase density, then sshd should just be off, and > not automatically started, unless it's required for work. Socket activation provides a smoother (runtime) UX for users, and is well established as a mechanism

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991592] Re: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port configuration from sshd_config

I'm not sure about this. What's the pattern that users can expect to see across all packages that provide socket activated services in Ubuntu in the future? I think there are three options here: "always", "sometimes" and "never". We could ensure that there's _always_ a generator that creates the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991592] Re: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port configuration from sshd_config

** Tags added: ssh-socket-activation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991592 Title: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990863] Re: conversion from sshd service to socket is too bumpy

** Tags added: ssh-socket-activation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990863 Title: conversion from sshd service to socket is too bumpy Status in openssh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991199] Re: sshd port migration is missing two config lines from jammy to kinetic

** Tags added: socket-activation ssh ** Tags removed: socket-activation ssh ** Tags added: ssh-socket-activation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991199

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991283] [NEW] "sshd -i" breaks due to socket activation

Public bug reported: On Jammy and earlier, simply running "sshd -i" worked. Now, it fails silently, and running it with "-d" gives me: Missing privilege separation directory: /run/sshd This directory is normally created with "RuntimeDirectory=sshd" as defined in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990586] Re: 22.04: python3* mismatched phasing breaks dist-upgrades

In terms of risk, touching apt is always going to be high risk because users need apt to revert or upgrade away from any regression. QA is therefore essential. Normally I'd like this to "bake" in the development release first, but given the nature of the bug, that's probably not going to give us

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990586] Please test proposed package

Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.8 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990684] Please test proposed package

Hello elatllat, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.8 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990684] Re: grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but 2.06-2ubuntu10 is to be installed

In terms of risk, touching apt is always going to be high risk because users need apt to revert or upgrade away from any regression. QA is therefore essential. Normally I'd like this to "bake" in the development release first, but given the nature of the bug, that's probably not going to give us

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1990863] Re: conversion from sshd service to socket is too bumpy

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:19:35PM -, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > 1) Nobody reads the release notes. That's where we document edge case issues that can't be handled automatically. Maybe we can handle this automatically, which is why I invited Steve to take a look. But if it turns out that we

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990863] Re: conversion from sshd service to socket is too bumpy

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Feedback on this is appreciated as we do want to make the transition as smooth as possible. I would warn though that just overwriting configuration files with "known good" ones following a release upgrade, as

Re: Tuesday Bug Triage Report (2022-09-27)

[mysql-8.0]- mysql_secure_installation can not set root > password and end…* > Here I was very careful when I've noticed that it's mysql issue. I have > added workaround for it in the comment sections. > @Robie Basak , @Lena Voytek > could you take a look at this bug an

[Group.of.nepali.translators] [Bug 1990907] Re: do-release-upgrade fails when ESM packages are installed

Hello Renan, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage- tools/27.11.1~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing

Re: Monday Triage Report (2022-09-26)

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 02:34:43PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > ### https://pad.lv/1890263 - +(In Progress) [php-defaults] - release > upgrade does not move to the new php apache mod > > Last comment was from Christian, who said that they're waiting for Robie > to sync with Steve on

Bug#1020518: [debian-mysql] Bug#1020518: Bug#1020518: libmariadb3 is a client library that include marriadb-common that will mess with /etc/mysql/my.cnf

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:32:05PM +0200, Ghislain Adnet wrote: > in fact /etc/mysql/mariadb.cnf does not exist as there is a mysql server and > not a mariadb one. mariadb-common ships /etc/mysql/mariadb.cnf. > I have a perconna mysql server running and i want to install mytop that > require a

Bug#1020518: [debian-mysql] Bug#1020518: Bug#1020518: libmariadb3 is a client library that include marriadb-common that will mess with /etc/mysql/my.cnf

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 05:28:27PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > Again, note that I'm still speculating here because I don't follow the > exact sequence of events which is causing the third party packaging to > trip up here. If there's something we're doing wrong then we should fix > it,

Bug#1020518: [debian-mysql] Bug#1020518: libmariadb3 is a client library that include marriadb-common that will mess with /etc/mysql/my.cnf

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Ghislain Adnet wrote: > So perhaps we could see it another way : > in this particular case i think that a client library, if it find an existing > /etc/mysql/my.cnf, should not do anything as it is there adn so everything it > need is okay. > There is no

Bug#1020518: [debian-mysql] Bug#1020518: libmariadb3 is a client library that include marriadb-common that will mess with /etc/mysql/my.cnf

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 05:10:05PM +0200, nobody wrote: >* What outcome did you expect instead? > >installing a client library should not require anything on the server side > and should not modify server configuration of mariadb or other mysql flavors > (imho ;p) Both MySQL/MariaDB

Bug#1020505: debuginfod is configured by an environment variable instead of /etc

Package: libdebuginfod-common Version: 0.187-2 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic Hi, libdebuginfod-common sets DEBUGINFOD_URLS to a reasonable default (after prompting appropriately because it's a privacy leak otherwise). But Debian Policy 9.9 says: "Programs

Bug#1020505: debuginfod is configured by an environment variable instead of /etc

Package: libdebuginfod-common Version: 0.187-2 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic Hi, libdebuginfod-common sets DEBUGINFOD_URLS to a reasonable default (after prompting appropriately because it's a privacy leak otherwise). But Debian Policy 9.9 says: "Programs

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1969901] Re: network-manager fails to renew ipv6 address

The test plan looks good - thanks! On reviewing the patch itself, it looks quite complex. We took a look upstream to see if there were any further fixes on the commit being cherry-picked, and found at least one. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969901] Re: network-manager fails to renew ipv6 address

The test plan looks good - thanks! On reviewing the patch itself, it looks quite complex. We took a look upstream to see if there were any further fixes on the commit being cherry-picked, and found at least one. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988819] Re: When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should say so

> We can't really store reasons for why something is kept back. How about: When something is scored down because it is not phased, make a note. When the scoring is all done, take the list of held back packages, and identify all those that have a note against them. Then print (up to) two lists:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1983618] Re: New upstream microrelease 2.5.13

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983618 Title: New upstream microrelease 2.5.13 Status

[Enterprise-support] [Bug 1983618] Re: New upstream microrelease 2.5.13

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server/Client Support Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu Server/Client Support Team

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989737] Re: beamer fails to handle the xcolor package options

Apparently upstream don't want us to cherry-pick the fix. It's probably fine legally, but I don't think it's worth getting into that given that I was only volunteering my time to try and help. Setting Won't Fix since it seems that this is unlikely to get fixed in Jammy then. I've not checked the

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989737] Re: beamer fails to handle the xcolor package options

Upstream fix here: https://github.com/josephwright/beamer/commit/f769f2ff60f3ade9b920f743ff65b46e5013758a ** Summary changed: - Bug in beamer with fix in v3.66 + beamer fails to handle the xcolor package options ** Also affects: texlive-base (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided

Re: Bug triage report for 2022-09-12 (Monday triage)

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:41:26AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > > LP: #1964829 - Triaged [apache2] - AH02808 when > > > using long (> 96 chars) ProxyPass worker name > > > > Fix Released for the development release. SRU tasks remain open, but I noted > > that there

Bug triage report for 2022-09-12 (Monday triage)

Nothing significant to note. Mostly work in progress, or minor metadata tweaks. Nothing new added to the backlog. Bugs last updated between 2022-09-09 (Friday) and 2022-09-11 (Sunday) inclusive Date range identified as: "Monday triage" Found 10 bugs > LP: #1979879 - *+Fix Released [samba]

[Enterprise-support] [Bug 1964829] Re: AH02808 when using long (> 96 chars) ProxyPass worker name

According to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53218 this was fixed upstream in 2.4.53. Kinetic has 2.4.54-2ubuntu1 so this is presumed fixed in Kinetic, and bug tasks remain open for Focal and Jammy. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871465] Re: ssh_config(5) contains outdated information

Hello iBug, or anyone else affected, Accepted openssh into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964506] Re: Ping: checks payloads incorrectly, ignores all mismatch replies

I'm not doubting that the revert was correct for upstream. But we have a different context in a stable release, where users may be relying on behaviours that upstream are at liberty to change in their main development branch, but we are not in our stable releases. Further, we can't just assume

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1964506] Re: Ping: checks payloads incorrectly, ignores all mismatch replies

I'm not doubting that the revert was correct for upstream. But we have a different context in a stable release, where users may be relying on behaviours that upstream are at liberty to change in their main development branch, but we are not in our stable releases. Further, we can't just assume

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958055] Re: sudo apport-kde is in a different design (stripped XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP)

Hello Kangarooo, or anyone else affected, Accepted sudo into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/1.9.9-1ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964506] Re: Ping: checks payloads incorrectly, ignores all mismatch replies

This is definitely a bug that we want to fix in Focal. But is this particular code change the correct way to do it? Won't reverting this commit regress the fix that was introduced by the commit in the first place? I think this needs a proper analysis of the possible implications for unaffected

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1964506] Re: Ping: checks payloads incorrectly, ignores all mismatch replies

This is definitely a bug that we want to fix in Focal. But is this particular code change the correct way to do it? Won't reverting this commit regress the fix that was introduced by the commit in the first place? I think this needs a proper analysis of the possible implications for unaffected

[Enterprise-support] [Bug 1989380] Re: squid 5.2 memory leak - affects Ubuntu LTS 22.04

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. According to the upstream bug, this is the upstream commit to master: https://github.com/squid- cache/squid/commit/752fa2083698a88533ef23d88490f43f153f7a4c It looks like this was fixed in 5.5-1, so marking Fix

Re: plasma-distro-release-notifier

Hi Erich, On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 05:32:45PM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > You may have seen my post and discussion in the MLs of ubuntu-devel, kubuntu- > devel and ubuntu-studio-devel (really, those with the Plasma desktops) > lacking > a way to be notified when a new Ubuntu version is

Re: Technical Board Elections Schedule

On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:53:31AM +0200, Philipp Kewisch wrote: > On 9/9/22 11:27 AM, Robie Basak wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 03:37:39PM +0200, Philipp Kewisch wrote: > >>2022-11-24 Nominations close, send to Mark for shortlisting > >>2022-12-01 Voting announced &

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1964992] Re: ZFS ignores ARC sizes below allmem/32

The correct logic shouldn't be hard to write, unless I'm missing something? So can we just do it right, and as soon as is necessary? If it's obviously correct, I don't think we need to wait for upstream acceptance, but equally it shouldn't take them long to review it either. Because the parameters

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1986852] Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for dmidecode has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1986852] Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for dmidecode has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >