On 9/9/07, Peter Hartzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, they have to be in memory *while in use*. Then they can be
forgotten, e.g., not cached in TT's cache, and when needed again, pulled
from the one central copy provided by memcached.
Well, yes, but you'd have to recompile them again
On 9/6/07, David Willams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, I'm not involved with apache internals, but are you saying it's
architecturally impossible for apache to somehow manage a hash that can, at
the same time, be available (read-only) to child processes?
There are things for apache that
On 9/6/07, David Willams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Child processes cannot update %CACHE, so what other apache methods or
architectural strategies exist (creative, elaborate, etc) or have been used
to update a similar hash?
You'll find many discussions about sharing data in the list archives
and
On 9/6/07, David Willams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the translation happens on a random, ad hoc string of sometimes
thousands of words, the process simply does something like this:
Untranslated:
hfj kei hty ... jan oej wio
Translated:
$CACHE{hfj} $CACHE{kei} $CACHE{hty} ...
On 9/3/07, Robert Carew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone used Catalyst with an Informix database and if so which ORM are
you using and what advice can you offer?
Any pointers in either getting DBIC to work with Informix or RDBO with
Catalyst would be gratefully received.
If you search the
On 8/30/07, bharanee rathna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
has anyone tried to create an instance of Apache2::RequestRec outside
apache ?
How could that work? And even if it could work, what good what it be?
This class is a Perl version of the C API to Apache's internals. It
has no other purpose.
On 8/30/07, bharanee rathna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would work for the purpose of testing, mainly simulating a request
without running apache like Apache::Test does currently.
Apache::Test does it this way because it's a better way to test. It
actually tests the full code path.
There are
On 8/29/07, Mohammad J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the worldcomp '07 conference, there was a method presented that is
available online at http://cacheconsistency.com. In short, by defining
dependency information in your source code whenever you set a cache element,
you can analyze the source
On 8/27/07, Nguyen Vu Hung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following code run without problems under Apache 1.3.29, Perl 5.6.1,
mod_perl 1.29.
Under the new environment which is Apache 2.0.52, Perl 5.8.8, mod_perl
2.0.3 ( Cent OS 4.5 ), it won't run.
There is no mod_perl-related code in what
On 8/23/07, Cory Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want something manages and
version my templates and then a view that lets Cat retrieve the
appropriate template through some means.
You can do something like that with Krang or Bricolage. They both
publish files rather than serving the
On 8/23/07, tprinty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you looked at memcache?
Don't put your messages into memcached unless you don't mind losing
some. It is not a database or reliable storage. It's just a cache.
- Perrin
___
List:
On 8/23/07, Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't use a DB as the backing store for a message queue if you will ever
need to pass a lot of messages thought it - you're just asking for
trouble doing it that way.
Like most things, it depends. If you need ACID properties for your
messages,
On 8/21/07, Jeff Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PerlHandler Package::Name
instead of:
PerlHandler Package::Name-handler
So on the first case,we need to write the handler as
sub handler { my $r = shift; ...}
because Apache may call the function directly as Package::Name::handler.
on
On 8/21/07, Foo JH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any technical advantages with either method, or is it a
TIMTOWDI option given to the developers?
You can structure your code differently with method handlers, in ways
that appeal to some people. There's an example here:
On 8/23/07, Foo JH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read http://perldoc.perl.org/attributes.html about attributes, but
it does not seem to suggest that tagging the method attribute to
subroutine has any programming advantages, unless you're interested to
list the subroutines with that attribute.
On 8/23/07, Jeff Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why it need prototype in mp1's method handler?
Subroutine attributes did not exist before perl 5.6.
- Perrin
On 8/21/07, usha rani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We would like to have information regarding configuration of MOD_PERL
2.0.3 with Apache Server -2.2.4
version in cygwin.
I need some information regarding configuration of httpd.conf file,
what are the changes we have to make
On 8/21/07, Jen mlists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does this mean mp1 handler need to be parsed and compiled each time
when requests came and called that handler?
No, it means that the dispatch code like MyModule-handler is parsed
and compiled each time.
- Perrin
On 8/21/07, Jordan McLain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sub handler ($$) {
my ($class, $r) = @_;
For some reason $r is not defined. This only happens intermittently... Does
anyone have any ideas?
Sounds like sometimes it doesn't get properly called as a method, so
$r ends up as the first
On 8/20/07, JónJósef Bjarnason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how --with-perl option works ?
or how to compile apache with perl 5.8.8 if this is not the correct way.
The page you're looking at is not related to mod_perl. It is for
configuring the command-line utilities that come
On 8/20/07, JónJósef Bjarnason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it's not mod_perl I am conserned with, that seems to sitt nicely at
5.8.8.
its Apache, it looks into the old lib directories ../perl/5.8.7 instead
of ../perl5/5.8.8
and I can't find where to change that in Apache.
Can you be more
On 8/20/07, JónJósef Bjarnason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache's @INC
Apache doesn't have an @INC because Apache doesn't have perl. It
looks like this is mod_perl's @INC. Did you print this out from a
script or module running through mod_perl?
To change which perl mod_perl is using, you just
On 8/19/07, Tracy12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you let me know for mod_perl compatibility what is the minimum CGI.pm
version we should have?
The most recent mod_perl-related change was in 3.20, but you really
should just grab the latest one.
The current list of changes is here:
On 8/17/07, Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I missed something along the way in this thread. Cookies? Is that to
block a specific client?
Yes, as opposed to an IP that could be a proxy.
I'm just thinking of blocking specific logins when too many failed
logins are attempted.
That
On 8/17/07, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But really, I'd like to solve this somehow so the default way works as
well. It would be nice if I could ask Apache::DBI not to call
reset_startup_state(), perhaps by passing a special connect attribute:
Do you think that Apache::DBI should
On 8/17/07, Manoj Bist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding is that a perl module that manipulates stdout is not
expected to work under mod_perl. IPC::Run manipulates stdout to make
different processes connected by pipes work.
IPC::Run used to work, at least on mod_perl 1. I've never
On 8/16/07, Tracy12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When we ran the same script on other Linux machine, the param value is not
showing, it looks to me from the observation that CGI.pm has not been
installed, but I was under the impression that mod_perl 2.0
CGI.pm is not bundled with mod_perl. It is
On 8/16/07, Jen mlists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to write speed limit module (for file downloading) by
modperl rather than using Apache's official module?
Yes, you have the full Apache API available to you from mod_perl. If
you look on CPAN, you may find something like this
On 8/16/07, Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for ideas on how to implement a way to detect and block
dictionary attacks. This is not a question of how to implement strong
passwords, but rather the act of limiting logins when too many failed
passwords have been attempted in
On 8/15/07, Michael Lackhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I didn't switch AutoCommit on or off and I didn't do a rollback
myself, so the question remains why the default configuration with
Apache::DBI and init_db(MyApp::DB-new) does a rollback when the
database is accessed from a new db (in
On 8/15/07, Graham Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So either init_dbh needs to be able to detect that the $dbh it gets is a
reuse of an existing connection, or Rose::DB-new needs to return the same
object for all calls for the same connection.
Even if init_dbh is changed, I think Apache::DBI
On 8/15/07, Nguyen Vu Hung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the code below, the class XXX:YYY3 inherits Net::Cmd,
IO::Socket::Inet, create an object $obj with the SUPER keyword.
As far as I know, this code works well under Apache 1.3, Perl 5.6,
mod_perl 1.3.
But in current environment which
On 8/14/07, Michael Lackhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my $db = MyApp::DB-new;
$self-my_db($db); # a new db for a new transaction
$db-begin_work; # Start transaction
... create two objects and save them ...
die Does it roll back?;
$db-commit;
I don't see any rollback there. It's a common
On 8/14/07, Michael Lackhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my understandig was that if perl dies within a transaction it (or
DBI) would do a rollback, from your answer I guess this is not the case.
No. Your database will do it if you cut the connection and there is
uncommitted work, but perl
On 8/14/07, Michael Lackhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only question: Is it really possible to call rollback as a class method
or do I have to call it on the specific object that started the transaction?
You have to call it on the database handle that started the
transaction. If all of your
On 8/14/07, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The simplest way to do this is to leave everything as per the
defaults, and just use Apache::DBI.
Note that Apache::DBI also does the automatic rollback for you, but
only if you have AutoCommit off when you connect. If you connect with
On 8/14/07, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked for that and didn't see it, and still don't see it.
Sorry, this was actually changed already. I was looking at an older release.
- Perrin
-
This SF.net email is
On 8/13/07, Manoj Bist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some recommended way to detect if STDOUT is being manipulated?
The source code is usually the easiest way.
The library is using TCP sockets to communicate with the server.
That usually is not a problem under mod_perl.
Is there some
On 8/14/07, Manoj Bist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to change the stack size in mod_perl(Similar to ulimit -s
unlimited etc.)?
The stack size? What are you trying to do? I'm not aware of anything
special about stack size in mod_perl that would be different from any
other compiled C
On 8/14/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Few issues here running threaded, but that depends on a host of other
decisions (ancient library bindings, different host contexts, etc).
It definitely could be the cause of issues with a C library using
sockets that isn't written to be
On 8/14/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm familiar with copy-on-write. Could you elaborate? From httpd's
perspective, those same gains are true of worker as well.
Perl's threads don't share much. Most of the memory is used for data
structures, and these are fully
On 8/13/07, Manoj Bist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a perl binding for a third party C library using swig. This
works fine under CGI but consistently fails under mod_perl.
Is there a known set of calls(mulithreading etc.) that is not expected to
work under mod_perl?
Modules with C code
On 8/13/07, Manoj Bist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the response. The C library is a third party library which does
the following:
- Connect to a server running on port 7000 on the local machine.
- Make an initialize call
==This call is consistently
On 8/12/07, Peter Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone has a solution from the Apache side, that's fine but I suspect
that it might be
easier to do this with Catalyst::Plugin::Static::Simple
Don't serve static content through perl. Let your webserver do it.
Usually people just set up
On 8/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a lot of times, 'static' content is found via database queries. and
sometimes that content needs to be protected from unauthorized viewers,
and your authorization mechanisms are already built into your application,
so you can't just use
On 8/11/07, usha rani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can we compile modperl programs in cygwin.
You g-billboards.com people need to stop asking the same question over
and over. If you're looking for Win32 binaries, they are on
http://perl.apache.org/. If that's not what you're looking for,
On 8/10/07, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to use perl source code filters (like Filter::Util::Call)
in scripts that are run via ModPerl::Registry?
I don't think that can work because of the way Registry modifies your
code. Try using handlers instead of Registry scripts, or
On 8/10/07, Foo JH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sad truth is that my clients are more comfortable with Windows OS
Is it possible that if they have a small enough site to run
comfortably on Windows, they can run it through CGI? I suspect that
whatever issue you're having with mod_perl could be
On 8/9/07, prasanthi devisetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to install mod_perl in cygwin , without configure file ,
Are you looking for Windows binaries? Those are here:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/install.html#All_in_one_packages
please send me reply as soon as
On 8/7/07, Mark Torrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's another alternative you might consider: If you are looking for a way
to have the lookup be fast (faster than you could get from a database) but
you don't want to let each Apache process grow as large as this data
structure, you could
On 8/7/07, Jen mlists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my mp1 script I wrote some info to apache's error_log:
} elsif ($ip_int != $ip_int2) {
$r-log_error([$ip FORBIDDEN] Request IP was not matched);
return FORBIDDEN;
But I saw it wrote many times for same error
It must
On 8/2/07, Don MacAskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way it invalides the cache is if TABLE has changed in any way, get
rid of any cache entries referencing this TABLE:
[...]
You can, of course, do much better than this yourself if you goal is to
cache certain SQL queries.
It's pretty hard
On 7/31/07, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except in the DBIx::Class, Class::DBI and plain DBI apps I've brought back
to production quality stability by removing it.
DBIx::Class and Class::DBI both handle connection caching on their
own, so that is not where one would need Apache::DBI.
On 8/1/07, Jerry Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS and SELECT FOUND_ROWS() do what you want?
Be careful. While it will give the correct number of rows that would
have been found if LIMIT had not been used, it makes the server
compute the whole result set,
On 8/1/07, Les Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS isn't an option for us. Right now I am doing two
queries, but I am just trying to see if there is a better way to do the
count query than to just turn it into a dervied table and count the
results i.e. SELECT COUNT(*) FROM
On 7/31/07, Clinton Gormley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you could do instead is to use DBI's connect_cached method, which
provides similar functionality. I actually use this instead of
Apache::DBI, even when running under mod_perl.
I also use connect_cached in many cases. Just be aware of
On 7/27/07, Tobias Kremer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While hammering my site with ab (Apache bench) I'm getting loads of the
the following error message:
Couldn't render template undef error -
DBIx::Class::ResultSet::find_or_create(): DBI Exception:
DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Duplicate
On 7/24/07, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache::DBI is an awful hack and should be avoided where possible.
Kind of an exaggeration. Apache::DBI is a useful module for porting
existing CGI scripts to mod_perl. If you aren't porting CGI scripts
to mod_perl, you can use other tools like
On 7/27/07, Jonathan T. Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:57:01AM -0700, Mesdaq, Ali wrote:
Are you sure that InnoDB would solve this issue? Even if just a row was
locked and you have 2 inserts at the exact same time how would that
resolve the issue?
One
On 7/30/07, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to consider it a neat hack. After some time with the internals,
some fun explicitly disabling it within DBIC since it sometimes broke our
reconnect code, and even then discovering I could often solve client mod_perl
problems by removing
On 7/30/07, Ken Perl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my question is I can not find any persistent connections for my CGI
script.
If you are running your scripts through ModPerl::Registry, all you
need to do is call DBI-connect normally and you will get persistent
connections.
- Perrin
On 7/30/07, Ken Perl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't run it under ModPerl::Registry
Did you run it under some other mod_perl module, like
ModPerl::PerlRun? If it's a CGI script, and you aren't running it
through something like this, then you aren't running it through
mod_perl and you won't be
On 7/30/07, Dodger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're being semantically picky with this guy, and innacurately so.
An apache registry script *is* a CGI script. So is an ASP page, a PHP
script, and any other interpreted way fo dealing with CGI input.
We tend to be generous with the use of the word
On 7/29/07, Brian Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The symptom I see that after a 'set', subsequent 'gets' show me
various results; sometimes the data comes back set, sometimes not.
The dbm implementation you're using will not always write everything
to disk until you untie it. To make this
On 7/23/07, Sid Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is either one significantly faster than the other?
Yes, LOAD DATA INFILE is much faster.
are there additional (faster) approaches I have not thought of?
Not that I've found. I think you'd have to write directly to the C
API to beat LOAD DATA
On 7/23/07, mos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Load data will of course be much faster. However to obtain the maximum
speed you need to load the data to an empty table, because then MySQL will
load the data without updating the index for every row that's added, and
will instead rebuild the index only
On 7/22/07, Dustin D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I had mod_perl up and running in my development
environment, so I pushed the new changes + apache configuration out to my
production environment, and immediately began tail -f on the logs.
What I noticed was, most of the time, everything
On 7/19/07, John Comerford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am in the process of putting together a web application. I have
decided to add a 'RowId' field to all my tables and assign it a unique
number so that I use it to retrieve data. In concept this number might
be passed back to the server as
On 7/19/07, Andrew Light [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one thing I have to figure out now, is how to manage the global varialbe
thing. To be honest, I have never heard about the Apache::Registry hack, I
just pop in all of my regular CGI files in a mod_perl environment and don´t
really have any
On 7/16/07, Thomas Hilbig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any MP code to extend the
functionality of the mod_autoindex to include a new
filter that is based on files that are before or after
a last-modified date?
Maybe one of these would help you:
On 7/19/07, Nils Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to change our code to have the handlers called by the Apache
server (PerlResponseHandler, PerlChildInitHandler,
PerlChildExitHandler). What I don't understand, is in which scope/object
I store the reference to the BerkeleyDB in the init
On 7/17/07, Clinton Gormley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But yes, 150 connections may be a lot depending on your database.
However, if you need 150 mod_perl children, then it is a busy site, and
you need a database server big enough to support it.
Anthony, Clinton is right. I suspect you haven't
On 7/13/07, apv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[% vote = Catalyst.user.votes({word = w.id}) IF Catalyst.user_exists %]
Just FYI, you should never do this type of construct in perl. It will
break in bizarre ways. I doubt that's the issue with TT, but don't
get in the habit.
my $vote = $foo if
On 7/13/07, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As anecdotal evidence to its insidious behavior, I've personally been
involved in a 5 man debugging effort that took 13 days (not full days,
but probably an average of 3-4 hours a day * 5 people * 13 days) to
finally find the bug. Which was simply
On 7/13/07, Jonathan Vanasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of the situation where you have 1 parent, 4 children.
all 4 children hit max-requests and exit before the first replacement
spawns. without a standing connection in the parent (or another
process using bdb in any way ) wouldn't
On 7/12/07, Jerry Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this query
will do it, but can it be redone without the sub-query by using JOINs?
Yes, use a LEFT JOIN.
Would that be more efficient?
Yes.
SELECT prod.prod_num, price.prod_price
FROM prod JOIN price
WHERE prod.prod_id =
On 7/12/07, Jerry Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the rows is identical except for the last bit, where mine is 4 and
yours is 2, does that mean yours is roughly more efficient by a 2:1 ratio?
For the most part, MySQL will do better with LEFT JOIN than an IN
subquery. You can read all
On 7/12/07, Jerry Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that will give me one record for every price that is not Yen, so if
a product has a price in USD and a price in GBP it will show up twice.
That would happen if you removed the 'USD' condition from the first
JOIN. Like I said, I'm not
On 7/12/07, mos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, joins will work faster if you load one or more tables in a Memory
table before you do the join.
Well, if your tables are so small that you can load them entirely into
memory, it probably doesn't matter how you code the query.
- Perrin
--
MySQL
On 7/12/07, Nils Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To achieve full performance, I read
that it better to tie the berkeleyDB once and reuse the handle for each
request, i.e. having the tie command outside of the mod_perl handler.
Yes. If you really are concerned with performance, don't use the
On 7/12/07, Jonathan Vanasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) the tie be global pre-fork
b) the tie be post-fork
c) there be no tie whatsoever , and somehow a connection is made
using the API at the beginning , and everything just uses the library/
api methods
~b + ~c
Open
On 7/11/07, Scott Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem: When the user hits refresh or forward, their magically logged in again.
Solution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post/Redirect/Get
- Perrin
On 7/11/07, Anthony Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A. We recently went live with a DB application and the system ground
to a halt. It could be due to many things, but the thing I'm looking at
is the fact that we had many network connections. I then found the
info about Databases
On 7/11/07, Christiaan Kras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I add to @INC with use lib qw(/my/path) . All the other modules I
load continue to work fine. Just those that use lazy loading fail
infrequently.
Okay, I think I see the problem. When you change @INC during a
request, the change only lasts
On 7/11/07, Christiaan Kras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I will try that. So basicly, the modules that are loaded at the
first request will stay in memory, but @INC will get reset?
Yes. It's a simulation of CGI behavior. The only reason your CGI
scripts don't have this problem is that
On 7/11/07, Christiaan Kras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I've used push() to add my path to @INC before. But that
didn't work out.
It should work fine. The reason people typically use unshift for this
is that it lets modules in your local path override ones in the system
path.
-
On 7/10/07, Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BerkeleyDB has an RPC layer for talking to remote clients.
Interesting. I had never heard of this before. It looks kind of
rudimentary. The docs say it's only single-process at this point, so
it serializes all data access.
I find the
On 7/10/07, Cookie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I start my apache server with mod_perl,I found some strange
output.I don't know how to solve this problem?
Usually this means you upgraded perl and didn't recompile mod_perl, or
your modules.
- Perrin
On 6/27/07, Colin Wetherbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a handler in a module called JetSet::Handler. That module
depends on a number of other modules, which I've tried to include with
'use', with limited success. It seems, sometimes, symbols act just fine
and reload when they should, but
On 7/9/07, Anthony Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking into a problem we're experiencing (lots of netword connections)
and I think the answer lies with Apache::DBI and the version of mod_perl
we're using.
Can you explain a little more about what the problem is and why you
think it
On 7/7/07, Daniel McBrearty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any easy way to keep some ad-hoc persistent data out of the database?
Sure. Most of them are either lossy or tricky to use, and tend to be
poor for concurrent reading/writing.
The obvious options are:
- BerkeleyDB. Fast, but
On 7/6/07, Frank Wiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another option for this is to use MogileFS
(http://www.danga.com/mogilefs/) to store your files. You can
control the redundancy at the app level and it just figures
out where the file is when you request it.
Keep in mind, you have to
On 7/5/07, Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With due respect, Perrin, I disagree with the (common, unfortunately)
belief that a lack of an active release cycle indicates that a package is
somehow unsuitable. Sometimes, that just means that it's done.
Sure, but the real problem is that no
On 7/5/07, CraigT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is what I'm hearing you say is that in the PerlRun environment (and I'm
guessing the mod_perl environment too), anything that a subroutine uses
coming from outside that code must be passed as a parameter like
'sub($paramter)'. Am I correct in this.
On 7/6/07, CraigT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I passing the paramters in the anchor
examples I presented earlier as I should using PerlRun or mod_perl?
I don't think you ever showed us the code. You just showed the code
where you print the HTML. If you can show us a complete sub and how
you
On 7/6/07, Christiaan Kras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm 100% sure it happens in the modules that use lazy loading
(eval(require module.pm)). Somehow @INC gets reset.
Are you sure @INC is getting reset? Sometimes people have this
problem because the user that apache runs as (usually nobody)
On 7/6/07, CraigT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this regard though, I would
like to ask what you recommend to pass back several paramters from a sub
The usual way to do it is to accept a list of return values:
my ($foo, $bar) = sub_call($param);
I'd like to focus on this problem here because
On 7/4/07, Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that this is a terrible way to do things. Perl has the right idea
with $sigils, so at least functions look different from other @things. Oh,
and you know... a lexical scope.
If you feel the need for complicated scoping rules in
On 7/5/07, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I was advising, basically, except that I would tell
people to use INCLUDE instead of PROCESS.
Else you'll be violating your own rule not to add variables to
the stash from inside a template, as soon as any of your blocks
are
On 7/4/07, pubert na [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Won't multiple simultaneous requests change the our variables
unpredictably since they all have access to the symbol table?
No. Every child process is completely separate and they don't share
anything. Each process only handles one request at a
901 - 1000 of 4038 matches
Mail list logo
