Bug#418021: title

2007-04-10 Thread C.Y.M
The title of this bug is misleading. Package: libx11-6 Version: 2:1.0.3-6 Severity: important It should read: Package: libx11-6 Version: 2:1.0.3-7 Severity: important -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#418021: title

2007-04-10 Thread C.Y.M
The title of this bug is misleading. Package: libx11-6 Version: 2:1.0.3-6 Severity: important It should read: Package: libx11-6 Version: 2:1.0.3-7 Severity: important -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#418021: title

2007-04-10 Thread C.Y.M
The title of this bug is misleading. Package: libx11-6 Version: 2:1.0.3-6 Severity: important It should read: Package: libx11-6 Version: 2:1.0.3-7 Severity: important -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#418238: [PATCH] auto.smb unable to handle double spaces and default window shares

2007-04-08 Thread C.Y.M
Package: autofs Version: 4.1.4+debian-1 Attached is a patch to fix auto.smb so it can handle double spaces in file share names (using gsub instead of sub) and also default administration shares. Autofs did not like the $ symbol in front of the default window share names. --CUT-- $SMBCLIENT

Bug#416066: nfssvc: writing fds to kernel failed

2007-04-03 Thread C.Y.M
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 09:00:22AM -0700, C.Y.M wrote: After I updated to the latest stable kernel (2.6.20.4), I have been noticing the follow errors in syslog. Did the api change? Is there a patch for nfs-kernel-server? I did not have this problem

Bug#414670: Acknowledgement (Unable to load xf86ExecX86int10)

2007-04-03 Thread C.Y.M
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they

Bug#414669: acknowledged by developer (closing 414669)

2007-04-03 Thread C.Y.M
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #414669: [PATCH] missing link for libwfb.so, which was filed against the nvidia-glx package. It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]. You

Bug#416055: [PATCH] fix for kernel 2.6.19+

2007-03-24 Thread C.Y.M
Package: cdfs-src Version: 2.4.20.a+2.6.18-1 Attached is a patch to fix cdfs so it builds with kernels 2.6.19+. Regards. diff -ru cdfs/2.6/audio.c cdfs-2.6.20/audio.c --- cdfs/2.6/audio.c 2006-10-24 12:44:49.0 -0700 +++ cdfs-2.6.20/2.6/audio.c 2006-12-11 12:30:47.0 -0800 @@

Bug#416061: [PATCH] fix for kernel 2.6.19+

2007-03-24 Thread C.Y.M
Package: lufs-source Version: 0.9.7-8.1 Attached is a patch to fix the api in lufs to build with kernels 2.6.19+ (the patch for 2.6.18 is not included, refer to bug #388389). Regards. --- lufs/kernel/Linux/2.6/inode.c.orig 2007-03-24 07:15:06.0 -0700 +++ lufs/kernel/Linux/2.6/inode.c

Bug#416066: nfssvc: writing fds to kernel failed

2007-03-24 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nfs-kernel-server Version: 1.0.12-4+b1 After I updated to the latest stable kernel (2.6.20.4), I have been noticing the follow errors in syslog. Did the api change? Is there a patch for nfs-kernel-server? I did not have this problem with 2.6.17.14 kernels and nfs. nfsd[16801]: nfssvc:

Bug#414669: xorg

2007-03-18 Thread C.Y.M
The problem turned out to be a bad patch introduced in xserver-xorg-core. Please close. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#414782: 42_build_int10_submodules.diff

2007-03-15 Thread C.Y.M
I tried removing 42_build_int10_submodules.diff from the patches and rebuild everything but I still had the same problem. Was there more to revert than just taking out this patch? I would be happy to test this if I could revert it back all the way. Best Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#414782: 42_build_int10_submodules.diff

2007-03-15 Thread C.Y.M
I tried removing 42_build_int10_submodules.diff from the patches and rebuild everything but I still had the same problem. Was there more to revert than just taking out this patch? I would be happy to test this if I could revert it back all the way. Best Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#414669: [PATCH] missing link for libwfb.so

2007-03-13 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.9746-2 I was getting a error in Xorg.0.log about a missing shared object. The problem is that nvidia names the .so differently. The attached patch fixes the problem. --- nvidia-graphics-drivers-1.0.9746/debian/nvidia-glx.links.in 2007-03-13 00:03:21.0

Bug#414670: Unable to load xf86ExecX86int10

2007-03-13 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.9746-2 I am having the following problem loading the int10 submodule with the latest nvidia drivers. I can not determine if this is an issue with nvidia or with xserver-xorg-core. ii xserver-xorg-core 1.1.1-20 X.Org X server -- core

Bug#414782: Unable to load xf86ExecX86int10

2007-03-13 Thread C.Y.M
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 1.1.1-20 I am having the following problem loading the int10 submodule with the all my different nvidia drivers. The nvidia developers tell me this is an issue with xserver-xorg-core. This is what Xorg.0.log has in it. I do not see any errors about missing

Bug#410879: Unable to load xf86ExecX86int10

2007-03-13 Thread C.Y.M
Additional info as requested. Thank you. X Window System Version 7.1.1 Release Date: 12 May 2006 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1 Build Operating System: UNKNOWN Current Operating System: Linux nofear 2.6.17.14.20070307.1 #1 PREEMPT Wed Mar 7 17:02:35 PST 2007 i686 Build Date:

Bug#410879: 410879

2007-03-13 Thread C.Y.M
I am having the same problem. Although I see one other bug in your log file that is part of the nvidia-glx package. I have submitted a patch to fix the libwfb.so missing file error. Refer to bug# 414669 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#414782: Unable to load xf86ExecX86int10

2007-03-13 Thread C.Y.M
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 1.1.1-20 I am having the following problem loading the int10 submodule with the all my different nvidia drivers. The nvidia developers tell me this is an issue with xserver-xorg-core. This is what Xorg.0.log has in it. I do not see any errors about missing

Bug#410879: Unable to load xf86ExecX86int10

2007-03-13 Thread C.Y.M
Additional info as requested. Thank you. X Window System Version 7.1.1 Release Date: 12 May 2006 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1 Build Operating System: UNKNOWN Current Operating System: Linux nofear 2.6.17.14.20070307.1 #1 PREEMPT Wed Mar 7 17:02:35 PST 2007 i686 Build Date:

Bug#410879: 410879

2007-03-13 Thread C.Y.M
I am having the same problem. Although I see one other bug in your log file that is part of the nvidia-glx package. I have submitted a patch to fix the libwfb.so missing file error. Refer to bug# 414669 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#399815: hwclock not set before root is checked

2006-11-22 Thread C.Y.M
Package: util-linux Version: 2.12r-14 When hwclock.sh was set to 11 (since we need / to be writable for the adjfile), it started causing timestamp errors when checking / on reboot (with S10checkroot.sh). This only affects systems with /usr on a separate partition and is related to bug # 342887.

Re: BUG: warning at fs/inotify.c:181 with linux-2.6.18

2006-11-18 Thread C.Y.M
>> >> Thank you for the confirmation. Please include me in this thread if >> someone >> finds the answer. This bug seems to occur very frequently on my >> machine with >> 2.6.18.1 so I have been forced to revert back to 2.6.17.13 until I can >> fix it. > > I haven't got around to looking at it

Re: BUG: warning at fs/inotify.c:181 with linux-2.6.18

2006-11-18 Thread C.Y.M
Thank you for the confirmation. Please include me in this thread if someone finds the answer. This bug seems to occur very frequently on my machine with 2.6.18.1 so I have been forced to revert back to 2.6.17.13 until I can fix it. I haven't got around to looking at it yet, sorry.

Bug#398677: nvidia-glx fixups

2006-11-14 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nvidia-glx-dev Version: 1.0.8776-1 There are a few minor bugs that should be cleaned up in the debian packaging scripts for nvidia. 1) nvidia-glx-dev.links and nvidia-glx-dev.links.in create malformed links because a # exists before the link name in the links file. Also, the second

Bug#398677: nvidia-glx fixups

2006-11-14 Thread C.Y.M
2) A diversion is created and referenced to /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 (but this link is never created in /usr/lib). I'm not sure what you are getting at here. /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 from libgl1-mesa-glx is diverted to /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa which shows up if libgl1-mesa-glx is

Bug#398677: nvidia-glx fixups

2006-11-14 Thread C.Y.M
So, the libraries in /usr/lib/nvidia are not really used, but kept to store the diverted file? I guess I got confused when I saw this in /usr/lib/nvidia: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 425320 2006-10-13 03:55 libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2006-11-14 08:53

Re: [linux-dvb] [av7110/budget/budget-ci/budget-av drivers] please test: drivers switched to I2C interrupt mode

2006-11-02 Thread C.Y.M
Oliver Endriss wrote: Hm - it compiles here without any warnings. ;-( Maybe some problem with macro expansion. The attached patch replaces the macros by inline functions. Does it work now? That fixed it. It compiles with no warning now, using a 2.6.17.13 kernel. Thanks! Seems to be working

Re: [linux-dvb] [av7110/budget/budget-ci/budget-av drivers] please test: drivers switched to I2C interrupt mode

2006-11-01 Thread C.Y.M
Oliver Endriss wrote: Hi, Thanks to Hartmut, I2C transfers of the saa7146 may now use interrupt mode. It will be enabled for av7110, budget, budget-ci and budget-av drivers. This might reduce cpu load and speed-up tuning. For testing the changesets are in my repositories: -

Bug#396384: [Patch] rules in debian.binary do not apply patches

2006-10-31 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.9625-2 Severity: important The paths are incorrect in the build rules when trying to apply the debian patches to the source code before building the nvidia-kernel module with make-kpkg. Also, the patches are not reversing properly when the rules cleans

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-23 Thread C.Y.M
Chad Flynt wrote: I am sure this is more widespread than people imagine. I know that everyone I talk to has this issue. But most don't participate on the ML. There are forums that have talked bout it all over. Most of us have just as said, gotten used to it and assumed it will never be

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-22 Thread C.Y.M
Udo Richter wrote: C.Y.M wrote: mplayer -vo mpegpes -ao mpegpes -framedrop -cache 4096 -slave -nolirc -quiet 001.vdr Notice that -framedrop is added to the command line. I wonder if that is the reason why mplayer is immune to the a/v desync problem. Definitely not just that. My playback

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-22 Thread C.Y.M
Torgeir Veimo wrote: On 22 Oct 2006, at 22:33, C.Y.M wrote: And just for completeness: No serious CPU load when playing back with VDR or mplayer. Yes, if the extra CPU load by mplayer is not even noticeable when playing back VDR recordings, and it is not prone to any type or desync

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-21 Thread C.Y.M
Udo Richter wrote: C.Y.M wrote: Utilizing mpegpes is really the best of both worlds. We would still be using the video output on the FF card but having software to process the actual mpeg decoding. There would be no transcoding involved because obviously the recording would already

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-21 Thread C.Y.M
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: C.Y.M wrote: ... [ problem with A/V desync ] I would have to say that this is exactly the same thing I have been experiencing for years and years. But, this never happens with budget cards.. only FF cards. I'm not sure what you mean here. Budget cards can't

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-21 Thread C.Y.M
My theory is that since audio is typically 600ms ahead of video, maybe the audio buffers run over. Strange thing is why this happens reproducible on blackness. Maybe due to extremely low bit rate in this situation, more frames get packed into one data block, causing data flow to be

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-20 Thread C.Y.M
Tero Siironen wrote: On 20.10.2006 15.09, Klaus Schmidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C.Y.M wrote: Since it has been several years now and I have never been able to solve the a/v desync issues with my Nexus-S FF card when playing back recordings... I'm replaying many recordings (actually

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-20 Thread C.Y.M
Udo Richter wrote: Tero Siironen wrote: However, like Pasi Juppo told earlier in other thread, in last weeks episode of Lost there was many fadeout-fadeins between scenes and a/v desync happened on every one of these. I've 'heard of such problems' on ATV+ and Lost. Whenever there's a fade

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-20 Thread C.Y.M
C.Y.M wrote: Udo Richter wrote: Tero Siironen wrote: However, like Pasi Juppo told earlier in other thread, in last weeks episode of Lost there was many fadeout-fadeins between scenes and a/v desync happened on every one of these. I've 'heard of such problems' on ATV+ and Lost. Whenever

Re: [vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-20 Thread C.Y.M
Juri Haberland wrote: Klaus Schmidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C.Y.M wrote: Since it has been several years now and I have never been able to solve the a/v desync issues with my Nexus-S FF card when playing back recordings... I'm replaying many recordings (actually most of what I watch

Re: [vdr] VDR to Xine playback -- no Audio?

2006-10-16 Thread C.Y.M
mlists wrote: I'm running VDR 1.4.3 with hoochster's patches. I've install xine but I'm not getting any audio. When vdr starts up and then xine -- I'm getting this: vdr-xine: Client connecting ... vdr-xine: Client connected! [VM]buffered 50.2 frames (v:50.2, a:0.0) buffered 51.5 frames

[vdr] FF card A/V sync suggestion

2006-10-16 Thread C.Y.M
Since it has been several years now and I have never been able to solve the a/v desync issues with my Nexus-S FF card when playing back recordings, I was thinking about what could be done. As of now, I have been using xine with my FF card to fix the problem. But, if I use xine, then even live tv

Bug#327570: Acknowledgement (missing /usr/bin/tput when rebooting)

2006-10-12 Thread C.Y.M
This bug seems to have resurfaced with 2.86.ds1-33. Is this still a lsb-base issue? Any idea how to fix it again? Best Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327570: Acknowledgement (missing /usr/bin/tput when rebooting)

2006-10-12 Thread C.Y.M
C.Y.M wrote: This bug seems to have resurfaced with 2.86.ds1-33. Is this still a lsb-base issue? Any idea how to fix it again? As a workaround to this bug, I have rebuilt the ncurses-bin package to place tput in /bin/tput instead of /usr/bin/tput. Unless there is a better suggestion

[Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#327570: Acknowledgement (missing /usr/bin/tput when rebooting)

2006-10-12 Thread C.Y.M
This bug seems to have resurfaced with 2.86.ds1-33. Is this still a lsb-base issue? Any idea how to fix it again? Best Regards. ___ Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list Pkg-sysvinit-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#327570: Acknowledgement (missing /usr/bin/tput when rebooting)

2006-10-12 Thread C.Y.M
C.Y.M wrote: This bug seems to have resurfaced with 2.86.ds1-33. Is this still a lsb-base issue? Any idea how to fix it again? As a workaround to this bug, I have rebuilt the ncurses-bin package to place tput in /bin/tput instead of /usr/bin/tput. Unless there is a better suggestion

Bug#391795: nvidia-glx package conflicts with xorg 7.1

2006-10-09 Thread C.Y.M
When I look at the control file for nvidia-glx 1.0.8774-3 , I see the following: Package: nvidia-glx Architecture: i386 amd64 Depends: nvidia-kernel-1.0.8762, x11-common (= 1:7.0.0), ${shlibs:Depends} Suggests: nvidia-settings, nvidia-kernel-source (= 1.0.8762) Conflicts:

Bug#391795: nvidia-glx package conflicts with xorg 7.1

2006-10-08 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.8774-3 Severity: important nvidia-glx package conflicts with xorg 7.1 because xorg now provides the virtual xserver-xorg-video package. A solution would be to remove xserver-xorg-video provides from the nvidia-glx package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#391795: nvidia-glx package conflicts with xorg 7.1

2006-10-08 Thread C.Y.M
Randall Donald wrote: On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 08:14 -0700, C.Y.M wrote: Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.8774-3 Severity: important nvidia-glx package conflicts with xorg 7.1 because xorg now provides the virtual xserver-xorg-video package. A solution would be to remove xserver-xorg-video

Bug#391795: nvidia-glx package conflicts with xorg 7.1

2006-10-08 Thread C.Y.M
Randall Donald wrote: On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 12:02 -0700, C.Y.M wrote: Randall Donald wrote: On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 08:14 -0700, C.Y.M wrote: Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.8774-3 Severity: important nvidia-glx package conflicts with xorg 7.1 because xorg now provides the virtual

Re: AW: [vdr] vdr-xine xine-lib 1.1.2 (patch update)

2006-10-08 Thread C.Y.M
martin wrote: Hey Darren, since some days, the xine-lib has changed a bit, so your patches fail against version 1.1.3. I've updated all necessary patches, to make xine-lib running with the current cvs version. You may want to update our patches on your site! What about

Bug#388386: [patch]

2006-10-05 Thread C.Y.M
C.Y.M wrote: This is a quick hack that solves the build problem with kernel 2.6.18. This is not a backwards compatible patch. Apparently, The 2.6.18 stats callback parameters have changed from 2.6.17 so that it takes a struct dentry* rather than a struct super_block. Revised patch applied

Bug#388386: [patch]

2006-10-05 Thread C.Y.M
Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * C.Y.M [Wed, Sep 20 2006, 07:33:55PM]: This is a quick hack that solves the build problem with kernel 2.6.18. This is not a backwards compatible patch. Stupid question: why do you need LUFS? I consider requesting its removal because almost

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 0/8] budget_ci: improve IR input handling

2006-10-03 Thread C.Y.M
David Härdeman wrote: On Tue, October 3, 2006 2:33, C.Y.M said: David Härdeman wrote: This series of patches includes a number of bugfixes and changes to the IR input handling of the budget-ci driver. If these patches are successful, can they also be implemented into the regular nexus-s ir

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 0/8] budget_ci: improve IR input handling

2006-10-03 Thread C.Y.M
David Härdeman wrote: On Tue, October 3, 2006 2:33, C.Y.M said: David Härdeman wrote: This series of patches includes a number of bugfixes and changes to the IR input handling of the budget-ci driver. If these patches are successful, can they also be implemented into the regular nexus-s ir

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 0/8] budget_ci: improve IR input handling

2006-10-02 Thread C.Y.M
David Härdeman wrote: This series of patches includes a number of bugfixes and changes to the IR input handling of the budget-ci driver. They are based on the dvb-ir patchset by Darren Salt and the two budget-ci patches that I recently sent to the list (meaning that they supercede patches 1

Re: [vdr] multiple keypresses with remote plugin

2006-09-27 Thread C.Y.M
Oliver Endriss wrote: Torgeir Veimo wrote: On 21 Sep 2006, at 09:03, Marko Mäkelä wrote: On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:43:09AM +0100, Torgeir Veimo wrote: Using the remote plugin with a /dev/input/eventX setup for a hauppauge grey remote via a nova-t sensor with X11/Xv using softdevice works

Re: [vdr] MP3/MPlayer plugin 0.9.15 available

2006-09-21 Thread C.Y.M
- Added -S option to ppmtoy4m call in example image convert script. Suggested by Thorsten Gehrig. I was thinking of something more like this for backwards compatibility: @@ -61,17 +61,23 @@ # # now run the conversion # + +# 'chroma subsampling mode' mjpegtools = 1.8.0 +if ppmtoy4m -h

Bug#388386: build failure with 2.6.18 kernel release

2006-09-20 Thread C.Y.M
Package: lufs-source Version: 0.9.7-8 Severity: important Build fails with kernel-2.6.18. /usr/src/modules/lufs/kernel/Linux/2.6/inode.c:62: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type /usr/src/modules/lufs/kernel/Linux/2.6/inode.c:414:5: warning: KERNEL_VERSION_CODE is not defined

Bug#388389: cdfs files to build with 2.6.18 kernel release

2006-09-20 Thread C.Y.M
Package: cdfs-src Version: 2.4.20.a+2.6.12-2 Severity: important Build fails with 2.6.18 kernel release. /usr/src/modules/cdfs/2.6/root.c:541: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type /usr/src/modules/cdfs/2.6/root.c: In function `cdfs_get_sb':

Bug#388388: cdfs files to build with 2.6.18 kernel release

2006-09-20 Thread C.Y.M
Package: cdrs-src Version: 2.4.20.a+2.6.12-2 Severity: important Build fails with 2.6.18 kernel release. /usr/src/modules/cdfs/2.6/root.c:541: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type /usr/src/modules/cdfs/2.6/root.c: In function `cdfs_get_sb':

Bug#388389: [PATCH]

2006-09-20 Thread C.Y.M
This is a patch that fixes the build problem with kernel 2.6.18. This is not a backwards compatible patch. Best Regards. --- cdfs/2.6/root.c.orig 2006-09-20 18:15:33.0 -0700 +++ cdfs/2.6/root.c 2006-09-20 18:29:39.0 -0700 @@ -543,8 +543,8 @@ #ifdef OLD_KERNEL static

Bug#388386: [patch]

2006-09-20 Thread C.Y.M
This is a quick hack that solves the build problem with kernel 2.6.18. This is not a backwards compatible patch. Thanks. --- lufs/kernel/Linux/2.6/inode.c.orig 2006-09-20 18:31:59.0 -0700 +++ lufs/kernel/Linux/2.6/inode.c 2006-09-20 18:33:02.0 -0700 @@ -510,9 +510,9 @@

Bug#386613: Udev fails to load DVB firmware

2006-09-08 Thread C.Y.M
Package: udev Version: 0.100-1 Severity: important Udev is unable to find firmware (/lib/firmware/dvb-ttpci-01.fw). DVB Drivers fail to load because hotplug does not work. The previous version of udev works fine. BR. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: AW: [vdr] execute command after vdr starts

2006-09-07 Thread C.Y.M
martin wrote: Just add option -r script.sh #!/bin/sh case $1 in before) ;; after) echo After recording $2 /usr/local/bin/startnoad.sh $2 ;; edited) echo Edited recording $2 ;; *)

Re: AW: [vdr] execute command after vdr starts

2006-09-07 Thread C.Y.M
Udo Richter wrote: C.Y.M wrote: Thanks for your replay, but I was looking for a switch that would make vdr run a script right after vdr starts up. If you want to start a program together with VDR, why don't you put it into your runvdr script? Because in the runvdr script, the vdr

[vdr] execute command after vdr starts

2006-09-05 Thread C.Y.M
Is there a command line switch that would allow me to define a command vdr must excute after initial startup? I see one for before and after recordings, but I am looking for a way to execute a command after startup only. Best Regards. ___ vdr mailing

[vdr] changes to runvdr for a nexus-s

2006-09-05 Thread C.Y.M
Here is an example of the changes that I have had to make to runvdr so that my nexus-s works. I have added a maximum retry value to runvdr so that vdr will not keep attempting to start over and over if there is a major problem with reception. Also, I have added a minimum runtime (in seconds)

[vdr] sofdevice and softplay cvs cleanups

2006-09-03 Thread C.Y.M
I have been trying to clean up my builds and when updated softdevice and softplay via cvs, noticed several warning about unused variables. Also, it appears that softplay does not have the current Makefile fixes required to build under the latest VDR. Best Regards, ---

Re: [vdr] sofdevice and softplay cvs cleanups

2006-09-03 Thread C.Y.M
C.Y.M wrote: I have been trying to clean up my builds and when updated softdevice and softplay via cvs, noticed several warning about unused variables. Also, it appears that softplay does not have the current Makefile fixes required to build under the latest VDR. And this one too.. BR

Re: [vdr] xine-lib.cvs Compile stop errors

2006-08-29 Thread C.Y.M
Darren Salt wrote: I demand that Stone may or may not have written... There is a fixed patchset here: URL:http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/patches/vdr-xine/ Darren, should all of these patches in your vdr-xine directory be applied to current xine development? Thanks for the

Re: [linux-dvb] Mythtv with NEXUS-S only

2006-08-26 Thread C.Y.M
Gavin Hamill wrote: On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:37:35 +0300 Lauri Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering is it possible to have Mythtv running with NEXUS-S FF card only, using it for capture _and_ tv-out MythTV site seems to be centered around PVR-card. I don't believe so - that's

Bug#366931: Apt fails of 0 byte files

2006-05-12 Thread C.Y.M
Package: apt Version: 0.6.44 Severity: important When I type apt-get source, apt fails on the following: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/apt/lists/sentinel.dk_debian_dists_unstable_contrib_source_Sources (2) E: Unable to

Bug#366931: Apt fails of 0 byte files

2006-05-12 Thread C.Y.M
Michael Vogt wrote: On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:59:42AM -0700, C.Y.M wrote: Package: apt Version: 0.6.44 Severity: important Thanks for your bugreport. When I type apt-get source, apt fails on the following: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done E: Unable

Bug#366219: The first section in the PT_DYNAMIC segment is not the .dynamic section

2006-05-06 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.8756-4 Severity: important When attempting to build nvidia drivers from the source, I get the following errors: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_installchangelogs dh_installdocs -s dh_installexamples dh_installdebconf dh_installinit dh_installman dh_link dh_strip BFD:

Bug#366222: dh_strip fails

2006-05-06 Thread C.Y.M
Package: debhelper Version: 5.0.34 Severity: grave When building packages, dh_strip is now failing. For example, the nvidia-glx package: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_installchangelogs dh_installdocs -s dh_installexamples dh_installdebconf dh_installinit dh_installman dh_link dh_strip BFD:

Bug#366222: dh_strip fails

2006-05-06 Thread C.Y.M
I don't think this is a bug in dh_strip; it looks like you have a buggy binutils installed. I've been using this version of debhelper to build all kinds of packages, without any errors of this kind; and in any case, the error messages are from strip, not from dh_strip. There has been a

Bug#366222: strip binary broken with latest binutils

2006-05-06 Thread C.Y.M
Going back to binutils_2.16.1cvs20060117-1 fixed the strip problem. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#366219: stip binary

2006-05-06 Thread C.Y.M
Sorry for reporting this against the nvidia-glx package. This is a binutils problem. Please close this against the nvidia package. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#366222: dh_strip fails

2006-05-06 Thread C.Y.M
Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 02:41:58AM -0700, C.Y.M wrote: I don't think this is a bug in dh_strip; it looks like you have a buggy binutils installed. I've been using this version of debhelper to build all kinds of packages, without any errors of this kind; and in any case

Bug#366222: dh_strip fails

2006-05-06 Thread C.Y.M
Joey Hess wrote: C.Y.M wrote: strip: debian/nvidia-glx/usr/lib/nvidia/stVEjyts: Bad value BFD: debian/nvidia-glx/usr/lib/nvidia/stVEjyts: The first section in the PT_DYNAMIC segment is not the .dynamic section I'll reassign this to the right package (you know, the one with strip

Bug#366222: dh_strip fails

2006-05-06 Thread C.Y.M
Package: debhelper Version: 5.0.34 Severity: grave When building packages, dh_strip is now failing. For example, the nvidia-glx package: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_installchangelogs dh_installdocs -s dh_installexamples dh_installdebconf dh_installinit dh_installman dh_link dh_strip BFD:

Bug#366222: dh_strip fails

2006-05-06 Thread C.Y.M
I don't think this is a bug in dh_strip; it looks like you have a buggy binutils installed. I've been using this version of debhelper to build all kinds of packages, without any errors of this kind; and in any case, the error messages are from strip, not from dh_strip. There has been a

Bug#358831: bash operand errors (forwarded from C.Y.M)

2006-04-18 Thread C.Y.M
C.Y.M wrote: Chet Ramey wrote: Matthias Klose wrote: C.Y.M writes: Reverting back to bash 3.0 fixes the problem. It seems bash 3.1 has broken the way the arrays are read. Once again bitten by using a too-general function for consistency across different expansions :-). I

Bug#362778: missing /usr/lib/libXft.la

2006-04-15 Thread C.Y.M
Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.8.2-6 Severity: important Please include /usr/lib/libXft.la in the installation. I use it to link into some older applications still. BR. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362777: missing /usr/lib/libXrender.la

2006-04-15 Thread C.Y.M
Package: libxrender-dev Version: 0.9.0.2-2 Severity: important Please include /usr/lib/libXrender.la in the installation. I use it to link into some older applications still. BR. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362783: broken manpages

2006-04-15 Thread C.Y.M
Package: libxau-dev Version: 1.0.0-2 Broken manpages mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3x/Xau.3x: No such file or directory mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/XauGetBestAuthByAddr.3x.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so' request mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3x/Xau.3x: No such file or

Bug#362782: Broken manpages

2006-04-15 Thread C.Y.M
Package: xbase-clients Version: 7.0.0-2 Broken manpages mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/atobm.1x.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so' request mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory

Bug#362778: missing /usr/lib/libXft.la

2006-04-15 Thread C.Y.M
Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.8.2-6 Severity: important Please include /usr/lib/libXft.la in the installation. I use it to link into some older applications still. BR. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362777: missing /usr/lib/libXrender.la

2006-04-15 Thread C.Y.M
Package: libxrender-dev Version: 0.9.0.2-2 Severity: important Please include /usr/lib/libXrender.la in the installation. I use it to link into some older applications still. BR. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362783: broken manpages

2006-04-15 Thread C.Y.M
Package: libxau-dev Version: 1.0.0-2 Broken manpages mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3x/Xau.3x: No such file or directory mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/XauGetBestAuthByAddr.3x.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so' request mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3x/Xau.3x: No such file or

Bug#362782: Broken manpages

2006-04-15 Thread C.Y.M
Package: xbase-clients Version: 7.0.0-2 Broken manpages mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/atobm.1x.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so' request mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory

Bug#362645: nvidia-glx-dev conflicts with libgl1-mesa-dev and can not install with latest Xorg

2006-04-14 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nvidia-glx-dev Version: 1.0.8756-4 Severity: important nvidia-glx-dev will not install and so I can not link any applications to the new nvidia drivers. dpkg: regarding nvidia-glx-dev_1.0.8756-4_i386.deb containing nvidia-glx-dev: nvidia-glx-dev conflicts with libgl-dev

Bug#362645: nvidia-glx-dev conflicts with libgl1-mesa-dev and can not install with latest Xorg

2006-04-14 Thread C.Y.M
Randall Donald wrote: On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 12:05 -0700, C.Y.M wrote: dpkg: regarding nvidia-glx-dev_1.0.8756-4_i386.deb containing nvidia-glx-dev: nvidia-glx-dev conflicts with libgl-dev libgl1-mesa-dev provides libgl-dev and is installed. dpkg: error processing nvidia-glx-dev_1.0.8756

Bug#361824: nvidia-glx-dev conflicts with xlibmesa-gl-dev

2006-04-10 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nvidia-glx-dev Version: 1.0.8756-1 Severity: important nvidia-glx-dev conflicts with xlibmesa-gl-dev and can not be installed. dpkg: regarding nvidia-glx-dev_1.0.8756-1b_i386.deb containing nvidia-glx-dev: nvidia-glx-dev conflicts with libgl-dev xlibmesa-gl-dev provides libgl-dev and

Bug#361578: required obsolete library - libdb2

2006-04-09 Thread C.Y.M
Package: htdig Version: 3.1.6-11.1 Severity: important Htdig requires libdb2 for installation. libdb2 has been obsoleted from Sid for i386. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#361369: conflicting files with modutils

2006-04-08 Thread C.Y.M
Package: manpages-dev Version: 2.25-1 Severity: important Conflicts with modutils pacakage. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/manpages-dev_2.25-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man2/create_module.2.gz', which is also in package modutils dpkg-deb: subprocess

Bug#361033: missing package dependency libdigest-nilsimsa-perl

2006-04-05 Thread C.Y.M
Package: razor Version: 2.810-1 Severity: important The libdigest-nilsimsa-perl package has been removed from Sid. Preparing to replace razor 2.720-1 (using razor_2.810-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement razor ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of razor: razor depends on

Bug#360343: dangling symlink libtemplate.so

2006-04-01 Thread C.Y.M
Package: unixodbc-dev Version: 2.2.11-11 Dangling symlink in /usr/lib/: libtemplate.so - libtemplate.so.1.0.0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#360345: dangling symlink libtdsodbc.so

2006-04-01 Thread C.Y.M
Package: freetds-dev Version: 0.63-2 Dangling symlink in /usr/lib/: libtdsodbc.so - libtdsodbc.so.0.0.0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   3   >