To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76623
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 11 15:37:52 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46696)
Display showing different formatting
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79419
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 10 06:03:25 +
2007 ---
There are a number of error reports lately with larger Writer documents. Please
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79346
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 9 18:06:23 +
2007 ---
This issue could be related to issue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79409
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 9 18:08:33 +
2007 ---
This issue could be related to
() was unnecessary complex (as it was based on the
official OASIS document specification). BUT RSQ() is really the square of the
Pearson coefficient, so this approach is the correct one!
discoleo - regina
Congratulations for the fine patch
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 6 20:00:28 +
2007 ---
I am trying to read and correct the OpenFormula document (see OASIS site,
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php?wg_abbrev=office
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69885
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 5 16:22:27 +
2007 ---
Well, this issue is really about mouse travel distance. Please also see issue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78596
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59051
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 16:38:02 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46038)
Simple Case Showing BUG
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59051
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 16:38:56 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46039)
Simple Test Case
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59051
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 16:42:25 +
2007 ---
The image shows the correct drawing after PASTE inside the writer document. When
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78565
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 17 10:09:19 +
2007 ---
It is displayed correctly on my PC.
I checked it with OOo 2.2.1 (en) on W2k SP4
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78524
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 17:56:17 +
2007 ---
This side effects is not going to be fixed anytime soon.
My proposal is to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78250
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 14 19:09:32 +
2007 ---
The 2nd spreadsheet contains the calculations using a stable algorithm. You can
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78250
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 14 19:11:25 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45943)
Test Case with Comparative STABLE ALGORITHM
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 8 19:25:55 +
2007 ---
UNSTABLE COMPUTER ALGORITHMS USED
A. ERROR
Various functions are affected, including:
CORREL()-series
RSQ(), and
STEYX()
As already pointed out on the dev-calc mailing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78250
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 8 19:51:01 +
2007 ---
You can change the values of 'X' in the Test-Case from 900,000,000 to other
values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78250
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 8 19:27:23 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45768)
Test Case for Unstable Algorithms
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78250
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 8 23:27:02 +
2007 ---
As these functions have been (obviously) fixed in recent versions of MS Office
(I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78181
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 12:22:29 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45729)
Table Formatting in phpMyAdmin
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 12:21:27 +
2007 ---
Various internet sites and web applications are using special highlighting for
tables, making reading the information significantly more easier.
Features:
- alternating
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78181
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 19:29:02 +
2007 ---
The Mozilla site seems to be non-responsive. But the OASIS site has an example,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 2 11:30:27 +
2007 ---
Can confirm it on OOo 2.2 W2k SP4.
Indeed, gluepoints are drawn incorrectly. (see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|viewing
Assigned to|kla
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 19:14:01 +
2007 ---
One feature that I really miss are histograms (this is dealt in issue 49971, see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77481
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 22:37:33 +
2007 ---
This is a duplicate of issue 66590
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59453
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 15 20:51:16 +
2007 ---
Crashing is definitely a BUG.
However, what wonders me is that when I select
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76575
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 6 20:47:31 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=44905)
Updated List with OOo Calc Functions
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 5 19:59:12 +
2007 ---
Nice thing to see at least a workaround.
I append some language specific
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76874
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 18:35:25 +
2007 ---
This is probably NOT valid CSV.
The ERROR is probably invalid.
For details about
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76874
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 18:38:43 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=44846)
Simple GAWK-script to test CSV validity
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6847
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 20:16:05 +
2007 ---
discoleo - redi2go
This issue is about extending *autocorrect*, so, my point
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6847
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 14:26:26 +
2007 ---
A more powerful approach to this issue is described in issue 67500. Indeed, such
an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47681
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 26 18:15:25 +
2007 ---
I discussed in issue 75493 (now closed) a method to enhance the printing /
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72331
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 24 13:37:05 +
2007 ---
In my opinion, both OOo and Excel perform a poor job here.
Of course, in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72331
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 24 19:41:02 +
2007 ---
In statistics, there is no use to display only one set of values.
The point is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72331
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76577
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 13:38:15 +
2007 ---
Well, I probably missed the point.
However, IF you only want to have a pseudo-csv
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76577
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 08:53:26 +
2007 ---
I submitted an issue about SQL integration into the OOo Calc component. For a
more
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4921
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4921
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4921
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 20:28:43 +
2007 ---
I have posted some sample C++ code above, implementing (partially) the one way
to|spreadsheet
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 21 16:26:23 +
2007 ---
This is a summary of Calc functions, including return value, parameters and
source code module where they are defined.
I decided to do this, because I did
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76575
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76575
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 20 20:45:32 +
2007 ---
Create a numbered list, e.g.:
'The LIST starts after this' = COPY UP TO HERE
1. something
2. something: = COPY FROM HERE UP TO (see above
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76560
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|spreadsheet
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 6 16:56:18 +
2007 ---
Unfortunately, Calc lacks even basic support for string functions (see my other
issues on strings, like issue 66590). This makes the program
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76156
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76156
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76156
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 6 18:12:26 +
2007 ---
1. I just wanted to add a real life example.
My primary work involves auditing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52077
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 6 18:20:05 +
2007 ---
This issue depends on issue 76156 (Counting the number of substrings within a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 20:58:09 +
2007 ---
The patch implements a more advanced FIND() function with the following
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1034
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 3 20:50:03 +
2007 ---
There is another important fact to consider when dealing with languages.
Although
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1034
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 3 20:50:03 +
2007 ---
There is another important fact to consider when dealing with languages.
Although
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75987
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 3 21:26:41 +
2007 ---
I believe that {=SUM(A1:A200=S)*1} or =ISNUMBER(FIND(S;A1) are NOT a real
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75493
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 27 20:04:23 +
2007 ---
Just define the print range.
Thanks for the hint. Indeed, it is possible to
by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 25 16:51:53 +
2007 ---
OOo lacks currently the ability to draw *Dot Plots*, which makes professionally
looking graphs more difficult to create.
A *Dot Plot* is a superior alternative to the *Bar Plot
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75468
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 17 14:22:06 +
2007 ---
In the PDF-Dialog Box, you can select in the tab 'General'-'Range': =
'Selection',
|printing
Assigned to|spreadsheet
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 17 22:30:15 +
2007 ---
This is an extension / customization of issue 36096
(http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36096).
APPLIES
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75493
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75493
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7019
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56449
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 22 18:27:16 +
2007 ---
Can confirm it on OOo 2.1 W2k SP4:
=POWER(-27, 1/3) returns
#VALUE! in OOo 2.1
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 20:23:18 +
2007 ---
Replace inside a Selection *deletes* the WHOLE selection.
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
==
1. create a new document (empty)
2. write something, e.g
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74707
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 21:03:53 +
2007 ---
This is actually an extension to bug
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74625
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 19 18:19:27 +
2007 ---
1. Well, it is good to know that the work has started. Though, I cannot agree,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74625
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74512
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 18 21:21:30 +
2007 ---
I have added 2 picture from an article published in the journal Nature
depicting
to|spreadsheet
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 17 15:54:22 +
2007 ---
This deals with an ERROR in the *automatic Formula Update* when transposing a
selection in Calc.
1. ERROR in Referenced Cells: wrong formula update
2. VLOOKUP
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74625
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 17 15:57:08 +
2007 ---
I introduced an error in the *STEPS TO REPRODUCE*
a. STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
Assigned to|kla
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 13 20:59:33 +
2007 ---
*Logarithmic Scale* - Different Bases
TARGET
==
Chart2 Reimplementation
This feature request should be integrated into the Scales and Intervals
Assigned to|kla
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 13 22:08:35 +
2007 ---
*Logarithmic Scale* - Display Original Values or the Logarithm Thereof
TARGET
==
Chart2 Reimplementation
This feature request should be integrated
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 9 03:20:06 -0800
2006 ---
I was told the results for *Mathematica* (v5.(x)):
It is as expected: -4^2 = -16
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66344
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 2 01:59:41 -0800
2006 ---
discoleo-fl
CUSTOM CASE:
- a title taken from the net:
High Prevalence
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66344
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 02:50:53 -0800
2006 ---
discoleo-fme
[QUOTE]
One question: I had a first glance at your spec draft
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66344
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 29 13:08:34 -0700
2006 ---
[QUOTE]
SBA- discoleo: About unwanted capitalisation, see
http://oooauthors.org
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66344
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59051
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 28 17:47:47 -0700
2006 ---
Just a small comment (I added it to the duplicate issue 70575):
1. Paste a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 15:32:53 -0700
2006 ---
Issue 24271 has been closed, but it is still a big BUG.
-4^2 = -16 !!! ALWAYS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70537
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 10:03:52 -0700
2006 ---
Although the target milestone is set to OOo Later I wish to encourage the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70736
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 10:54:20 -0700
2006 ---
I wish to encourage the developers to correct all these RTF problems as fast as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 20 01:06:52 -0700
2006 ---
[QUOTE]
+abcd= if it generates an error then it is shown as an error (similar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 08:54:01 -0700
2006 ---
I posted previosly:
- option to DISABLE this !!
However, the current comment is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 09:21:14 -0700
2006 ---
I had a new brainstorming session and would like to expand on some issues/
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70575
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 14:31:48 -0700
2006 ---
OK, I can reproduce it.
OOo 2.04 (en)
W2k SP4
STRANGE:
The preview in Windows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70575
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 14:37:37 -0700
2006 ---
*STARNGE, STRANGE*
Opening attachment id=39867, displays the picture erroneosly.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70575
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 15:21:25 -0700
2006 ---
There is a more general problem:
I will attach 2 simple files (I reduced the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70575
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70575
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70575
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 16:07:04 -0700
2006 ---
The file content.xml seems to be different between the 2 files (my 2 files: the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70575
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Priority|P2
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|discoleo
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 17 14:42:21 -0700
2006 ---
I have tried to open an rtf document. Unfortunately there are major differences
brterrn OOo 2.04
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70537
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1035
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1035
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 5 11:23:28 -0700
2006 ---
A MORE COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
=
Many issues were
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 5 11:23:28 -0700
2006 ---
A MORE COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
=
Many issues were
401 - 500 of 545 matches
Mail list logo