To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29848
--- Additional comments from gma...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 24 20:17:59
+ 2010 ---
Although the declaration "Issue 23212 has been marked as a duplicate of this
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=13483
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18462
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55085
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=23212
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 24 08:13:27 +
2008 ---
I wonder if this issue could get resolved more easily now inside the new
spreadshee
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59205
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69092
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 7 09:14:33 +
2007 ---
I suggest to join (expand) this issue with
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83207
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
(error message: User gmaths doesn't have access to
project.
Regards
Gisbert Friege
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83207
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 6 16:44:26 +
2007 ---
Does this "Approved!" already mean, that I should be able to use the ssh-tunnel?
Un
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64689
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 08:32:43 +
2007 ---
I do agree totally!
And I wonder why my 2 votes for this issue constitute 50% of al
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=14242
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
riority|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|gmaths
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 21 15:27:17 +
2007 ---
There are two options when creating new autotext:
(a) New
(b) New (text only)
When inserting autot
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66560
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 19 16:20:10 +
2007 ---
Still defect in OOo 2.1 - any hope for a fix?
One user reported that sometimes it l
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5156
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 11 07:35:00 -0800
2006 ---
If a new keyword "rgbcolor" with values 00 ... FF would be introduced,
in f
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 13 06:21:47 -0800
2006 ---
I updated my OOo (on Win98) from 2.0.3 to 2.0.4 -> looks fine now :-)
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5156
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 11 09:25:27 -0700
2006 ---
For large sizes, the "scalable brackets" look like parallel straight lines.
Printou
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|gmaths
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 11 07:05:48 -0700
2006 ---
With updating to OOo 2.0.3,
the variable brackets do not look round but quite ugly
(see screenshot).
I used the select menu to get the following source
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66560
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|gmaths
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 19 08:21:57 -0700
2006 ---
When producing double underlines with
underline {underline 123}
the results differ:
- sometimes it will be a single thick line
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=14242
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 23 07:05:30 -0700
2006 ---
Issue may be closed because the proplem is fixed in actual versions of OOo.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=23909
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 27 22:23:12 -0800
2006 ---
ok: moved my votes to 7998 :-)
Gisbert
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=23909
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 16 05:16:34 -0800
2006 ---
please reopen the issue, as it is not a duplicate of 366
Gisbert
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 11:53:23 -0700
2005 ---
-> FT
... or have you mistaken my "besides doubts" as doubts about the translation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53296
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 11:25:51 -0700
2005 ---
-> FT
No, "Sicht" is not "techie german" !
In german we use "meine Sicht auf diese
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31062
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31062
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18035
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 09:25:59 -0700
2005 ---
In swriter-tables (OOo 1.1.4) there seems to be the same problem with
BorderInner.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=23909
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 09:52:35 -0700
2005 ---
please reopen the issue, as it is not a duplicate of 366
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31789
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31789
User gmaths changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39264
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 9 08:37:23 -0800
2005 ---
No improvement in Beta 1.9.79
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 9 08:32:09 -0800
2005 ---
Still not fixed in OOo Beta (1.9.79).
Should we collect occurencies here or somewhe
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31789
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 9 08:28:35 -0800
2005 ---
Still not fixed in OOo-Beta (1.9.79).
Should we collect the occurencies here ?
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31789
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 9 08:28:35 -0800
2005 ---
Still not fixed in OOo-Beta (1.9.79).
Should we collect the occurencies here ?
--
Subcomponent:|code
Assigned to:|of
Reported by:|gmaths
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 03:03:02 -0800
2005 ---
After the installation of OOo 1.9.77 on WIN98 SE, I tried to start OOoBase. It
started asking the usual licence and names
42 matches
Mail list logo
