correctly. FYI, I posted a quick-and-dirty patch for FreeBSD ports tree here:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201005121901.47789.jkim
Ideally it should have been passed down from main configure script.
Jung-uk Kim
-
Please do
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93235
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 16:31:16 +
2008 ---
Sun does not support FreeBSD directly but we have patchsets against Sun's SCSL
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93235
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 3 17:09:08 +
2008 ---
You can get rid of IBM, Blackdown, and BEA. We do not support them officially
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 7 18:04:17 +
2007 ---
pjanik: yes, it was exactly the same error as far as I remember although I
didn't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78417
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 7 19:04:39 +
2007 ---
I have carefully examine the code again and I have concluded that it is actually
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78417
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 7 19:06:54 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47370)
Clean up pointer arithmetics and for loops.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78417
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78417
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 4 00:38:16 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47305)
GCC 4.2.1 generated files.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80003
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 1 18:33:36 +
2007 ---
@hjs: I haven't tried your patch yet but
xslt_LDFLAGS+=-lxml2 -lz
is very wrong.
://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/OOo-scp2.diff
I have built successfully on amd64 but I need more wider testing, e.g., i386,
Linux, MacOSX, etc. I don't mind using your patch as a stopgap, though.
-
Please do not reply
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80129
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80003
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80003
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 16:59:09 +
2007 ---
@obo: Isn't it possible that you had no $LIBXML2LIB and $ZLIB3RDLIB because
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80003
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 17:22:25 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47084)
More generic fix to include default libraries
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80003
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 24 22:54:08 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47056)
Another fix
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80003
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65514
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 2 20:05:19 +
2007 ---
By reading the SUSE's patch closely, amd64 assembly doesn't not seem any better
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65514
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 2 20:31:32 +
2007 ---
maho: FYI, I just updated openoffice.org-2-devel port:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65514
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 2 20:54:07 +
2007 ---
FYI, this is relevant part from db-4.3.29.NC/dist/aclocal/mutex.ac:
# x86/gcc:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 17:08:30 +
2007 ---
-kr, I made a separate map file for FreeBSD/amd64 and it worked okay. The last
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 17:12:42 +
2007 ---
-kr, I am sorry that I missed your last comment. :-( I cannot speak for MacOSX
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 18:27:14 +
2007 ---
-kr: yes, FreeBSD has the same ABI as Linux.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 17:36:30 +
2007 ---
Ah, it was addressed by issue 77975 and partially fixed in CWS cmcfixes35. I
say
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67904
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69418
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69994
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76968
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76969
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77615
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 19:55:18 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46196)
Use NOOPTFILES instead of adding CFLAGSNOOPT
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 20:05:40 +
2007 ---
Can you verified the attached patch as well? We should not add CFLAGSNOOPT
after
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 20:13:20 +
2007 ---
I forgot to add environment detail. It is FreeBSD/amd64 -CURRENT and GCC 4.2.
I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76115
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76141
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65514
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 22:54:21 +
2007 ---
maho: any update on this issue?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 00:03:16 +
2007 ---
kr: It seems there are some missing pieces. See the attachment.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 00:04:37 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45681)
Plug missing pieces.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 00:16:37 +
2007 ---
maho: since you have changed the description, can you add the attached patch as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 00:17:56 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45682)
Patch from issue 70845
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 00:21:18 +
2007 ---
Argh... File paths in the patch are screwed but you know what I meant. ;-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 01:22:50 +
2007 ---
maho: Excellent. Thanks!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 16:38:10 +
2007 ---
Confirmed the same horrible death on FreeBSD/amd64. :-(
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76968
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76969
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76969
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 17:37:18 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=44919)
Move i386-specific compiler options to where they
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76969
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 17:39:08 +
2007 ---
The previous patch was not complete. Please use this patch instead.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76141
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 19:28:38 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=44850)
Updated to match SRC680_m211.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76141
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 19:31:39 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=44851)
Patch against OpenOffice.org SRC680_m211 source.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76141
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 19:34:05 +
2007 ---
FYI, the first patch is against FreeBSD ports tree.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 17:19:09 +
2007 ---
jkim-sb
I haven't tested the final patch but it looks okay to me. Thanks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 18:06:21 +
2007 ---
jkim-sb
FreeBSD 4.x does not have _SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX in unistd.h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 18:21:50 +
2007 ---
Sorry, OpenBSD does not define _SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX, so it falls under category
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 18:25:17 +
2007 ---
I verified DragonFlyBSD falls under 1.1 category.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 16:50:28 +
2007 ---
As maho noted earlier, this problem is inherited from FreeBSD, i.e., it is both
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 01:19:35 +
2007 ---
jkim-ericb
This patch looks good to me although I haven't tried it. However
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 02:29:34 +
2007 ---
BTW, if sysconf(3) returns -1 with EINVAL it has to be treated as UNKNOWN
because
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 7 07:12:15 +
2007 ---
EINVAL(22) is correctly handled by the sb69, i.e., it returns NULL. Real
problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65462
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69469
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 21 15:04:36 -0700
2006 ---
No, it didn't:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69469
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69469
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 4 08:47:46 -0700
2006 ---
Could you please comment, why you want to add server jvms?
Just because AMD64
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 17 09:56:26 -0700
2006 ---
mmeeks:
POSIX standards are here:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 10:05:52 -0700
2006 ---
This has been haunting many projects for long time and GCC is, of course, one of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 10:10:10 -0700
2006 ---
FYI, I had the patch here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-sentinel
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 11:33:40 -0700
2006 ---
FYI, my patch is updated with fpicker fixes.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66064
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 16 23:28:28 -0700
2006 ---
I found that I had bad CUPS configuration. Please close this issue.
Sorry for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 1 10:38:08 -0700
2006 ---
It's a duplicate of 65511.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 1 11:53:32 -0700
2006 ---
I looked at your patch:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65337
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 22 13:07:31 -0700
2006 ---
I found it was crashing in one of the GTK libraries. So, I installed KDE and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65004
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 19 18:49:38 -0700
2006 ---
FYI, this is FreeBSD PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80293
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65514
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65514
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 19 19:01:12 -0700
2006 ---
Since OpenOffice does not use autoconf directly, I handcrafted it for AMD64. It
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65337
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 17 07:41:54 -0700
2006 ---
No, that's not me. ;-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65337
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 16 09:17:16 -0700
2006 ---
The patch is resync'ed with m169:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/OOo20-m169.diff
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65337
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 16 14:46:58 -0700
2006 ---
I just confirmed bootstrap.cxx crash was caused by i64906.
83 matches
Mail list logo
