To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 20 13:10:10 +
2011 ---
From your own paste:
+ARCH_FLAGS+=-march=armv6 -mfloat-abi=softfp -D__SOFTFP__
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 20 13:11:22 +
2011 ---
Will attach a new patch, which
- defaults to armv4t, removed hardcoded forcing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 20 13:22:11 +
2011 ---
FTR for armhf port: http://wiki.debian.org/ArmHardFloatPort
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 20 17:55:45 +
2011 ---
(and maybe, but this is just cosmetic, the actual check just should be after
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sat Feb 19 13:31:01 +
2011 ---
I just went to #debian-arm, to go sure that my memory didn't fool me:
4:25
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116680
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 28 10:16:44 +
2011 ---
see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116195
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116195
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 21 17:29:28 +
2010 ---
see also issue 81224
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116195
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116195
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 21 18:08:42 +
2010 ---
(besides that: why are you using agg anyway - you can --disable-agg and forget
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116195
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 21 18:43:56 +
2010 ---
even if your argument was right: as I said in the other issue - if *you* want
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111499
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 29 14:36:30 +
2010 ---
according to EIS, OOO330_m2. Ans there's also the obvious Target milestone:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113494
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113494
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113494
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 15 15:30:29 +
2010 ---
(and before you say that it is not in the tree - if it should be do then you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114999
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 12 13:07:53 +
2010 ---
i'll put some distro maintainers on CC to make them aware of the problem...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114970
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114970
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 6 19:01:17 +
2010 ---
maybe also more stuff which Oracle for whatever reason does not build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114924
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 5 14:56:49 +
2010 ---
patch is broken
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114924
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 5 14:59:35 +
2010 ---
it would do a libxslt build even for --with-system-libxslt (which also implies
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113958
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 30 07:50:42 +
2010 ---
but last what I know is that r egcomp still will exist for stuff which cannot
URL|
OS/Version|All
Status|NEW
Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
Resolution|
Issue type|PATCH
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|configure
Assigned to|rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114828
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114828
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 29 15:56:12 +
2010 ---
note that this probably needs a aclocal run
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114833
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|iss...@tools
Reported by|rene
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 29 16:03:32 +
2010 ---
.. as in the attached patch. Saves custom stuff.
-
Please do not reply
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 29 20:54:59 +
2010 ---
and which systems would that be? And wouldn't it be better to just use the GNU
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114753
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114753
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111970
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95472
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95472
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114410
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 8 20:00:23 +
2010 ---
camc: thanks for the cc, but apparently it's not the case for the hppa hang.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17808
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 6 06:30:43 +
2010 ---
fwiw, now also requested at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74271
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 2 15:19:35 +
2010 ---
actually Lazlo says us here that those patterns are *NOT* derived from LaTeX but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114050
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114050
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114075
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 26 12:13:54 +
2010 ---
cd: no. but according to your rules this is a stopper, so..
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|os
Reported by|rene
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 23 20:35:39 +
2010 ---
[ seen in m3 aka Beta, still in m5 according to below ]
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO330/file/d9859c6e249e
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114075
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114075
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 23 20:41:08 +
2010 ---
(note that the OOo ones don't contain ir)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25832
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99796
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
to|kr
Reported by|rene
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 18 09:49:59 +
2010 ---
Hi,
from http://bugs.debian.org/593440:
--- snip ---
revoke component
'file:///usr/lib/openoffice
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113958
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102518
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102518
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sat Jul 31 19:19:16 +
2010 ---
my personal feeling is that it should be fixed for 3.3, as it was broken in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113461
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113227
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 28 14:21:41 +
2010 ---
i wonder why doesn't configure check for i586-mingw32msvc-c++ itself (on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113503
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 28 20:16:34 +
2010 ---
nice, but what about sbs point in that other issue (cppunit needs to check
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113503
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83878
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 20 07:59:04 +
2010 ---
jl: ah, thanks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113229
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 19 07:36:03 +
2010 ---
sb: even if it is that, that is no reason to reassign it to me.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 19 07:38:06 +
2010 ---
(and note I didn't try on unxlngi6, and won't do so for some time to come. My
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113084
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113247
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113227
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 19 13:53:09 +
2010 ---
Ah, wait. I am blind.
WTF is this calling -c++ in the second step? Should be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113227
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113227
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113227
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 19 14:05:23 +
2010 ---
missed one place. Updated patch:
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113227
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113227
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113247
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 19 15:22:54 +
2010 ---
fpe: because a build is supposed to also work without net connection (after you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113247
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 19 16:20:01 +
2010 ---
(but note I can live with 2 if we decide to not want the new requirement and/or
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113229
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 19 18:40:15 +
2010 ---
I said you should file it upstream, yes - but I assumed you would send a patch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112758
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112758
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83878
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 19 22:49:50 +
2010 ---
jl: doesn't work for me: vanilla-built m1. Unzipped sun-report-builder.oxt (and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113223
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113223
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113223
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113223
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113223
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113223
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113227
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|rene
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sun Jul 18 16:31:53 +
2010 ---
Entering /home/rene/OpenOffice.org/OOO330_m1/odk/source/unowinreg/win
i586-mingw32msvc-c++ -Wall -D_JNI_IMPLEMENTATION_
-I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include
-I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80021
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sun Jul 18 16:35:55 +
2010 ---
cmc: that's good :)
svp. In the second case I still get:
:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}:}/home/rene/OpenOffice.org/OOO330_m1/smoketestoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/lib:/home/rene/OpenOffice.org/OOO330_m1/solver/330/unxlngx6.pro/lib
/home/rene/OpenOffice.org/OOO330_m1/solver/330/unxlngx6.pro/bin
to|of
Reported by|rene
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sun Jul 18 18:14:08 +
2010 ---
See last comment in http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112758.
Build was a vanilla one with --disable-odk:
--- Additional comments from rene Sun Jul 18 17:11:51
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112758
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sun Jul 18 18:14:39 +
2010 ---
filed as issue 113228
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80021
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 16 07:53:56 +
2010 ---
I dislike this patch for several reasons:
a) if we need a intrusive patch we
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80021
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 16 08:22:30 +
2010 ---
no, I just use the data (upstreams version iconv'ed. actually the command
stolen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113199
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113199
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 16 14:35:34 +
2010 ---
.. ah, right. and because you don't have that info we should go back into the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113199
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 16 14:44:44 +
2010 ---
If if you fix the first one, please keep the -core one, as that's where it is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81224
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 13 17:42:20 +
2010 ---
I'd dearly like to see this fixed.
Then fix aggs license.
When using
Assigned to|spreadsheet
Reported by|rene
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 12 22:24:25 +
2010 ---
[ I still see it in (vanilla) m84 ]
From http://bugs.debian.org/588471:
--- snip --
I'm start to use statistic in my school, my teacher said me my result
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113043
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113043
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113043
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 9 14:04:23 +
2010 ---
(same with --force-configure ftr)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113043
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113043
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
1 - 100 of 2873 matches
Mail list logo