To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 15 15:24:48 -0700
2006 ---
It was a little bit harsh but it was probably because of my unfortunate wording
in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 15 12:09:28 -0700
2006 ---
PS: Please don't get my last comment wrong - people often misinterpret my
postings,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 15 11:57:14 -0700
2006 ---
> As I've written last time: "rm -rf" is needed and not "rm -f" otherwise
> symlik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User superandrzej changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 15 10:30:31 -0700
2006 ---
There is one thing that is still wrong:
As I've written last time: "rm -rf" is need
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 14 14:44:17 -0700
2006 ---
> there is missing directory "./"
> without this the package wont remove correctly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User superandrzej changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User superandrzej changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 30 12:53:41 -0800
2005 ---
> Not sure whether I got this right. You want to include a script in the package
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 28 09:49:05 -0800
2005 ---
For the JCA, please sign http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/jca.pdf and mail/fax
it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 21 03:18:04 -0800
2005 ---
>wrt JCA,
How can I do this?
>I as a gnome-user don't like the idea of not suppor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 13:43:55 -0800
2005 ---
wrt JCA, yes - one can argue about the level of "coding" involved.. Sure the
attach
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 15 07:38:02 -0800
2005 ---
cloph,
Here come the answers to your questions.
Ad 1) I didn’t sign JCA. What I h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User ssa changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
User superandrzej changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
24 matches
Mail list logo
