To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 4 09:46:59 +
2010 ---
sb: ok, added the check :-(
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 4 09:41:00 +
2010 ---
> We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the
> STLport-require
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 4 09:33:23 +
2010 ---
@cmc: Might work (problematic could be the ABIs of cppuhelper and salhelper,
in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 4 09:16:39 +
2010 ---
>> 1 CPPUNIT_CFLAGS should probably always only be added to CXXFLAGS, never to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 4 08:53:21 +
2010 ---
mumble, we should really consider dropping using stlport in OOo itself, and just
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 4 08:37:40 +
2010 ---
> 1 CPPUNIT_CFLAGS should probably always only be added to CXXFLAGS, never to
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 4 08:25:20 +
2010 ---
"any objection to push it like it is [...] and do finetuning/improvements
later?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 3 23:33:19 +
2010 ---
sb: any objection to push it like it is (+/- stuff I will find, a build runs
cur
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 3 23:25:35 +
2010 ---
s/libwpd/cppunit/ in configure.in of course, will not attach a new file for just
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 3 21:53:07 +
2010 ---
"I only noticed that one, will grep for the rest. they are for example?": e.g.,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 3 21:50:41 +
2010 ---
> Do they need the include
answer to myself: yes, sal/qa/rtl/*.cxx
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 3 21:46:01 +
2010 ---
> Wanted to do it minimal-invasive, but we can do, yes.
Besides that, we do tha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 3 21:39:17 +
2010 ---
> 1 libs.mk CPPUNITLIB: For one, shouldn't the check for SYSTEM_CPPUNIT come >
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 3 21:30:33 +
2010 ---
@rene: A few things come to mind:
1 libs.mk CPPUNITLIB: For one, shouldn't th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
Issue #|109791
Summary|[cws sb118] system-cppunit
Component|tools
Version|current
Platform|All
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
20 matches
Mail list logo
