setting max reuse number for a tape?

2000-11-10 Thread Paul Lussier
Hi all, Is there a way to tell amanda to not re-use a tape more than X number of times? I'd like to limit my tape re-use to something like 7 times or so before I remove it from the configuration and replace it with a new one. Thanks, -- Seeya, Paul I'm in shape, my shape

backup order and starttime

2000-11-10 Thread Frank Smith
The starttime option works for making sure a backup occurs AFTER a certain time, but how can you make sure one occurs BEFORE a time? Do you have to specify a later starttime for every disk except the one you want to get backed up first? For example, if amanda starts running at 10pm, and

Re: setting max reuse number for a tape?

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Is there a way to tell amanda to not re-use a tape more than X number of times ? Not yet. My planned output rewrite will maintain attributes for each output media and this could go along with that. Paul John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How many dumpers active?

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Looking at the amstatus code in 2.4.2 indicates the output you indicated *is* displayed if you pass the --stats option. Thanks. I used to have a mix of 2.4.1p1 and 2.4.2 and I don't think this arg used to be needed. However, I don't see any way to get that output using 2.4.1p1. I don't

Re: Change Tape Cycle?

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
... My job last night was on tape 16, and according to the report, expects tape 1 tonight. ... Could you post the exact message? Also, the result of: amadmin config tape My amanda.conf says there are 25 tapes in cycle. ... Do you mean you have "tapecycle 25"? Did you change this before

Re: amverify, amrestore - read problem

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
... What does it mean "Block size for 'b' option must be a positive integer multiple of 4" ... That's a message from your restore program. Because Amanda is having it read the image from a pipeline, some versions of restore get confused if they get what's called a "short read". Amanda is

Re: YAAQ (Yet another amanda question)

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Load tape DEIMOS02 now Continue? [Y/n]: timeout waiting for amrestore increase READ_TIMEOUT in recover-src/extract_list.c if your tape is slow amrecover: error reading tape: Success extract_list - child returned non-zero status: 1 Continue? [Y/n]: On the /tmp/amanda/amidxtaped.debug I get: ...

How do I check level 1 sizes?

2000-11-10 Thread Chris Karakas
Hello, I want to check the level 1 sizes that AMANDA reports. For 3 filesystems I continue to get the right size for level 0, but quite a large one for level 1 (50-90% of level 0). I am quite sure that they did not change the last days. I even forced a full dump without any effect to this

Amdump Fails

2000-11-10 Thread Nicci Tynen
Hi all, I have amanda configured on an Intel box (PIII) running RedHat 6.1, kernel 2.2.12-20. I compiled version 2.4.2-19991216-beta1 and am not using RPMs. My tape drive is a VXA. I do incrementals Monday through Thursday and a full backup every Friday. My incrementals work fine, unelss

Re: YAAQ (Yet another amanda question)

2000-11-10 Thread Gonzalo Arana
"John R. Jackson" wrote: Load tape DEIMOS02 now Continue? [Y/n]: timeout waiting for amrestore increase READ_TIMEOUT in recover-src/extract_list.c if your tape is slow amrecover: error reading tape: Success extract_list - child returned non-zero status: 1 Continue? [Y/n]: On the

Re: backup order and starttime

2000-11-10 Thread Chris Karakas
Frank Smith wrote: The starttime option works for making sure a backup occurs AFTER a certain time, but how can you make sure one occurs BEFORE a time? I suppose AMANDA polls the current time and starts dumping as soon as the "starttime" is in the past. In this case, if the polling interval

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-10 Thread Chris Karakas
Denise Ives wrote: Can anyone please explain to me what Amanda did here after the full dump to tape daily118 on Tuesday 7 Nov 2000 ? To me it looks like Amanda did a level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1 dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Friday

amrecover: Unexpected server end of file

2000-11-10 Thread Paul Lussier
Hi all, could someone please explain what this error means? [root@amanda amanda]# amrecover -d /dev/st0 AMRECOVER Version 2.4.2. Contacting server on amanda ... 220 amanda AMANDA index server (2.4.2) ready. 200 Access OK Setting restore date to today

Re: amrecover: Unexpected server end of file

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Hi all, could someone please explain what this error means? ... amrecover: Unexpected server end of file Any idea what "file" came to an unexpected end? The network connection to amindexd on the server. What's in /tmp/amanda/amindexd*debug on the server (at least the last several

RE: Where are instructions for setting up amandad on clients?

2000-11-10 Thread Bort, Paul
Title: RE: Where are instructions for setting up amandad on clients? The instructions are there, but not in the way you were expecting. It says somewhere near the beginning of the server install that the client install is similar. Here's the quick run-down of what you need to do on the

Re: amrecover: Unexpected server end of file

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Never mind, I was stupid, I forgot the config name :) Which obviously should be better handled, i.e. an explicit message back to amrecover. So it wasn't exactly all your falut :-). I already have a note to myself to fix this. Paul John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL

Re: amrecover: Unexpected server end of file

2000-11-10 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:51:33 EST "John R. Jackson" said: Never mind, I was stupid, I forgot the config name :) Which obviously should be better handled, i.e. an explicit message back to amrecover. So it wasn't exactly all your falut :-). I already have a note to myself to fix

Re: amverify, amrestore - read problem

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
AMANDA uses a block size of 32768 when writing to tape. Your tape device should be prepared with this block size *before* you try to acces it for restore (and each time after you load a new tape) with the command: mt -f /dev/yourtapedevice setblk 32768 I prefer variable blocking, i.e. "setblk

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
... To me it looks like Amanda did a level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1 dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Friday am. Yes, exactly. Your AMANDA works fine, where is the problem? The problem is that off line of discussions on this list, I

Re: Datagram size for estimates revisited

2000-11-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Nov 10, 2000, Chris Karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *if* the problem is really the buffer size of the pipe that AMANDA uses (being too small) That's a symptom, not the problem. The problem is (or appears to be, from the given description) that Amanda doesn't handle the possibility of the

Re: Dump failing on 1 disk.

2000-11-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Nov 9, 2000, "Robert L. Harris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nose.incyte.agency.com:c1t6d0s6 0 6380292k dumping to tape I put in a new tape, commented the rest of the disks out of my table and started amdump. It's been sitting there for about an hour now. It may take a while to

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Nov 10, 2000, "John R. Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... To me it looks like Amanda did a level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1 dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Friday am. The problem is that off line of discussions on this list, I