Re: Problem with device sg*

2001-05-01 Thread Juergen Knott
Hi! > I'm not sure where the problem is, so I suggest a few steps to find what's > working and what's not. > First see if the Tapedrive is found at all. Cat /proc/scsi/scsi and see if > you find a device of type Sequential-Access like this: cat /proc/scsi/scsi brings: Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id:

Re: FW: bad file system specification.

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>... I have had to remove the disks from /etc/fstab, so that the >failover software has control of mounting and dismounting the data disks. I >am now receiving this error in the sendsize.debug log: > >dump: Bad file system specification or bad file system. The raw device must >dump: be entered wh

Re: Problem with gtar backup, Compaq Tru64

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
> I'm backing up a Compaq Tru64 client (elvis), and when the backup >runs I get the following message on _some_ filesystems: >... >? gtar: Device number out of range What version of tar is this (/usr/local/bin/tar --version)? I see where a message *similar* to this comes out of 1.13, but i

FW: bad file system specification.

2001-05-01 Thread John Peter Gormley
I am running Amanda 2.4.1-p1 on some Compaq tru64 boxes (vers 4.0D) and using dump/vdump to run my backups. Last weekend I switched to an automated failover of two of my systems (ASE) which required me to carve up my shared disk array and create separate filesystems that were then assigned to serv

Problem with gtar backup, Compaq Tru64

2001-05-01 Thread David Woodruff
Hi, I'm backing up a Compaq Tru64 client (elvis), and when the backup runs I get the following message on _some_ filesystems: /-- elvis /chroot lev 1 FAILED [/usr/local/bin/tar returned 2] sendbackup: start [elvis:/chroot level 1] sendbackup: info BACKUP=/usr/local/bin/tar sendbackup

Re: taper: unexpected EOF

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>Hi, if multiple tapes are needed to complete all the disks in >one's disklist, is "taper: FATAL syncpipe_get: w: unexpected EOF" >on all but the last tape expected? ... No. It's fatal. It means one side of taper has died. I think I've fixed most of these bugs with 2.4.2p2. >Paul Yeatman Jo

Re: Strange Amanda Error: sendbackup: index tee cannot write [Broken pipe]

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>It is a 100meg card set to autoselect between all of the 100 and 10 base T. Uh, huh. On Solaris, at least, autoselect is death. No matter what you try to do, it will pick wrong and really bad things start to happen. We **always** force the issue with an explicit config file entry. I don't kno

Re: Amanda on MacOS X and suppressing gtar output on samba volumes

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
> I've got the client side of amanda compiled and installed >on MacOS X, but it won't use dump. I think I've got gnutar going on >it now, we'll see tonight. But I'd rather use dump, unless someone >can tell me why using gnutar would be so much better. For one reason, dump doesn't work on

taper: unexpected EOF

2001-05-01 Thread peanut butter
Hi, if multiple tapes are needed to complete all the disks in one's disklist, is "taper: FATAL syncpipe_get: w: unexpected EOF" on all but the last tape expected? Or does this imply an incorrect tapetype setting? -- Paul Yeatman (858) 534-9896[EMAIL PROTECTED] ===

Re: amdump fine, amflush bombs

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>Yes, I ran it in the background. No, there's no amflush.NN file. Sorry. I just looked at the code and apparently it's in your log directory and named amflush (no numeric suffix). Could you take a look for that, please? It should have stuff that looks a lot like the amdump.NN files. John R. J

Re: PC backup problem

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>... The unix machines backup okay but the PC's don't. ... Let me guess. You actually think that's a problem. :-) >msserver //aitken/dwa lev 0 FAILED [missing result for //aitken/dwa >in msserver response] What version of Amanda are you using? What does amcheck say? Is /etc/amandapass being

Re: amlabel not seeing tape

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>I upgraded mt from 0.5b to 0.6 but the "insert tape into slot and press >return"-loop problem remains. Now you know why we're dumping dependency on mt in the next Amanda release. Every vendor in the world generates a different output format and parsing them is next to impossible. What happens

Re: amdump error

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>I am trying to see why my cron job "amdump Daily" is sometimes failing >with the message: > > "amdump: amdump or amflush is already running, or you must run > amcleanup" Is there any chance the run from the night before hasn't finished? Was the machine possibly rebooted while the pr

Re: Test dumps

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>Is there a way to run amdump on my current configuration without it >counting against me? >... >Is there more? You also want "record no". And you'll want to save the curinfo database and restore it afterward. Possibly the log.* files as well. And maybe tapelist, while you're at it :-). My g

Re: How to tell Amanda to keep the latest full+incremental on the holding disk?

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>What I would like to do is, for a given set of sensitive file systems, keep >the last Level 0, level 1 etc.. on the holding disk ... >Is it the case of RTFM, or does Amanda not support this type of arrangement? It does not support this, although it's probably a good idea. I've added it to the T

amdump error

2001-05-01 Thread Jason Brooks
Hello, I am trying to post my messages atomically: one topic at a time. Please let me know if this is not correct... I am trying to see why my cron job "amdump Daily" is sometimes failing with the message: "amdump: amdump or amflush is already running, or you must run amcleanup

Test dumps

2001-05-01 Thread Jason Brooks
Hello, Is there a way to run amdump on my current configuration without it counting against me? I think I need to do: 1) set tapedev to /dev/null 2) changerfile is already commented out 3) index=no Is there more? --jason -- ~~~ Jaso

Re: getting wrong estimates?

2001-05-01 Thread Hanno 'Rince' Wagner
Hi, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner schrieb am 01. Mai 2001: > Since one filesystem is >40GB big, I divided its content into > different directories which shall get backed up (these tapes can > hold 25GB native so I can not put it on one tape). > > As soon as I start amdump it tries to get estimates - and

Re: more info on recovering w/o an index

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>i know to use amrestore, but not sure of the options... >Config = DailySet1 >Tape = DailySet108 >Date = April 24, 2001 >Files Wanted = /opt (possibly restored to /opt2) Is the tape drive on the same machine that you want to restore to? Assuming it is not: 1. Mount the tape on the Amanda ser

Re: RegEx within disklist?

2001-05-01 Thread John R. Jackson
>... I would like to use RegEx within >the disklist and say one SaveSet is /path/to/save/[0-b] next one is >/path/to/save/[c-n] and /path/to/save/[o-z] or something similar. Is >this possible? ... As Mitch said, Amanda does not support this. In addition to his suggestion, you can run a script i

Re: Strange Amanda Error: sendbackup: index tee cannot write [Broken pipe]

2001-05-01 Thread Ryan Williams
- Original Message - From: "John R. Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ryan Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:20 PM Subject: Re: Strange Amanda Error: sendbackup: index tee cannot write [Broken pipe] > >Below are the two pertinant parts

getting wrong estimates?

2001-05-01 Thread Hanno 'Rince' Wagner
Hiho, today, I decided to start new with my backups. I use NetBSD-1.5S and an ADR50 from OnStream, Amanda Version 2.4.2. I took my disklist and put as first step the files on the backupprocess which are the biggest disks (or directories). Since one filesystem is >40GB big, I divided its content

Re: amlabel not seeing tape

2001-05-01 Thread George Herson
"Bort, Paul" wrote: > My guess would be the "Unknown tape drive type" is the cause of the problem. > The problem is that in between the "-> status" and the "-> loaded", > chg-manual is running the "mt status" command and hoping to find "ONLINE" in > its results. In my version of mt, ONLINE is one

re: amdump fine, amflush bombs

2001-05-01 Thread pearsond
Sorry, I switched machines and my reply email wasn't configured... > >Lately I've been having severe problems with amflush. ... > > What version of Amanda? 2.4.2p1 > > >*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing file: Bad file descriptor]]. > > Did you run this in the background (without the -f

more info on recovering w/o an index

2001-05-01 Thread Joseph McDonald
i know to use amrestore, but not sure of the options... Config = DailySet1 Tape = DailySet108 Date = April 24, 2001 Files Wanted = /opt (possibly restored to /opt2) thanks Joe

Re: gnutar & client configuration

2001-05-01 Thread Pierre Volcke
Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > On Tue, 1 May 2001, Pierre Volcke wrote: > > > checking for gnutar... (cached) tar > > ... > > > > (what does this mean?) > > This means you didn't rm config.cache before running configure, so > configure used info saved in config.cache from the last time you > ra

RE: amlabel not seeing tape

2001-05-01 Thread Bort, Paul
My guess would be the "Unknown tape drive type" is the cause of the problem. The problem is that in between the "-> status" and the "-> loaded", chg-manual is running the "mt status" command and hoping to find "ONLINE" in its results. In my version of mt, ONLINE is one of the General Status Bits.

amlabel not seeing tape

2001-05-01 Thread George Herson
Hi. I'm trying to amlabel my Travan5 tape in my Linux 2.2.14-5.0 machine but i get: "insert tape into slot and press return" in a loop. Taking the tape out and putting it back in doesn't help. Pressing return just repeats the message. The exact command i'm using is: /usr/local/sbin/amlabel Dell

Amanda on MacOS X and suppressing gtar output on samba volumes

2001-05-01 Thread Paul Root
Hi, I've got the client side of amanda compiled and installed on MacOS X, but it won't use dump. I think I've got gnutar going on it now, we'll see tonight. But I'd rather use dump, unless someone can tell me why using gnutar would be so much better. I haven't been able to get t

Re: gnutar & client configuration

2001-05-01 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Pierre Volcke wrote: > checking for gnutar... (cached) tar > ... > > (what does this mean?) This means you didn't rm config.cache before running configure, so configure used info saved in config.cache from the last time you ran it. You should rm config.cache and run confi

recover w/o index

2001-05-01 Thread Joseph McDonald
indexing wasn't turned on.. any possible way to recover from the tapes?

gnutar & client configuration

2001-05-01 Thread Pierre Volcke
hello, I've just installed an Amanda backup client on an AIX 4.3 box. amanda version : 2.4.2 # client side # gnu-tar has been installed on this client in /usr/local/bin/gtar and to be quite sure, I've also made a link as /bin/gtar -> /usr/local/bin/gtar On this client, A

PC backup problem

2001-05-01 Thread Steven Law
Hi, I had to rebuild our server recently but did not have to reinstall all of amanda as it was on a separate disk. The unix machines backup okay but the PC's don't. They have the error msserver //aitken/dwa lev 0 FAILED [missing result for //aitken/dwa in msserver response] smbclient works oka

Re: increasing level zero dumps per tape cycle (?)

2001-05-01 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 at 6:29pm, Jason Brooks wrote > I am suffering a bit from terminology shock. Here's what I want to > know: > > I have thirty tapes in my tape cycle. I want to be certain to get TWO > level zero dumps of each file system in this tape cycle. Is this as > simple as having my d

Re: RegEx within disklist?

2001-05-01 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote: > Instead of putting now > every directory into the disklist, I would like to use RegEx within > the disklist and say one SaveSet is /path/to/save/[0-b] next one is > /path/to/save/[c-n] and /path/to/save/[o-z] or something similar. Is > this possi

Re: inetd

2001-05-01 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Christian Lox wrote: > I am planning to use Amanda to back up just one server. > Is it possible to run Amanda without inetd, or at least to bind only > to localhost. > I want as little as possible open ports to the outside world... If the only entry in your inetd.conf is fo

inetd

2001-05-01 Thread Christian Lox
Hi everyone, I am planning to use Amanda to back up just one server. Is it possible to run Amanda without inetd, or at least to bind only to localhost. I want as little as possible open ports to the outside world... Thanks in advance, Christian -- we reject: kings, presidents, religions we ac

Re: DLT7 Autoloader, won't load tapes..

2001-05-01 Thread Lennart Anders Hansen
> > Can you send me the debug files please (/tmp/amanda/chg-scsi) > > Which version of amanda/chg-scsi ? It's version 2.4.2p2 I did't know about the debug file, the "only" thing i can see, is somthing about, it can't write to scsi device.. witch is very weird... -Lennart -- Len

Re: DLT7 Autoloader, won't load tapes..

2001-05-01 Thread Thomas Hepper
Hi, On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:05:37AM +0200, Lennart Anders Hansen wrote: > > Hey everybody, i have tryed to get this software to run on a linux > file-server, i have a DLT7 Autoloader from Tandberg on a Adaptec 2940u2w SCSI > controller. > > The problom is, that i cannot load any tapes into

Re: How to tell Amanda to keep the latest full+incremental on the holding disk?

2001-05-01 Thread Jason Shupe
I don't think amanda was designed with such a goal in mind. Here's a couple ideas to consider: Idea 1: It's too bad you're amanda server isn't on solaris, or another OS with support for large files. I know the 2.4 kernel has support for large files, but I'm not sure abou