Re: User Configuration for Amanda

2001-06-29 Thread Olivier Nicole
I use GNU tar, never used dump, but I created a group amanda, a user amanda, like a plain group and user. I configured --with-user=amanda --with-group=amanda I made Under root, I made install and that's it, I did not need to modify ANY group or ownership of the files. It works automatically

Re: gtar error

2001-06-29 Thread Olivier Nicole
>FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: > sbs.sbsala /home lev 0 FAILED [/usr/bin/gtar returned 2] What is inside /tmp/amanda/sendbackup* or /tmp/amanda/sendsize* about the disk? Olivier

Re: User Configuration for Amanda

2001-06-29 Thread a blob of green gelatin
For things that you want to keep accessed by certain uids, you can change the group and make it group readable. That's what I had to do to get AMANDA to be able to read my raw devices (partitions) for backing up. You can just create a user called 'amanda' and a group called 'backup'. Make 'bac

Re: CD as tape device?

2001-06-29 Thread John R. Jackson
>Would it be possible to set up the tape device so that one could use a >CD burner for backups? You want the amanda-242-tapeio branch from CVS. That generalizes the Amanda tape I/O subsystem and one of the "drivers" is called "file", which writes to a set of disk files to emulate a tape. You co

CD as tape device?

2001-06-29 Thread Thomas Kleymann
Would it be possible to set up the tape device so that one could use a CD burner for backups? Best regards, --Thomas Kleymann

Re: User Configuration for Amanda

2001-06-29 Thread John R. Jackson
>... There are files on the system which are only >readable by the root user, so I'm wondering how another user can read those >files unless it is also a privileged user. ... If you use the system dump program (e.g. "dump" or "vxdump" or whatever your vendor calls it), that reads from the raw d

Re: Portrange, port insecure, I'm very confuse...

2001-06-29 Thread John R. Jackson
> I can't understood about portrange. ... You're not the only one :-). It's pretty confusing. I posted an overview of how Amanda uses ports to amanda-hackers last week. You might look in the archives for Subject "Use of UDP/TCP ports in Amanda". >If I choose an port < 1024, I have >set

User Configuration for Amanda

2001-06-29 Thread Rob Earl
I'm currently trying to get Amanda running on my Compaq Tru 64 UNIX system and seem to be having a problem with user permissions. I understand that a typical AMANDA configuration uses a user other than root, however I haven't found much information (maybe I'm not looking in the right place) about

Portrange, port insecure, I'm very confuse...

2001-06-29 Thread Sulamita Garcia
Hi I can't understood about portrange. If I choose an port < 1024, I have set user=root, and I don't want this. But if I choose an port > 1024, amdump complains 'port not secure'!!! So, I must set user=root??? What can I do? |\_/| /###\ _|#(!) (!)#|_

Re: gtar error

2001-06-29 Thread John R. Jackson
>FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: > sbs.sbsala /home lev 0 FAILED [/usr/bin/gtar returned 2] > >Amdump writes the image to the holding disk fine, but then fails on the tape >write. ... That's not what that message means. Amanda does not use gtar to write to tape. It runs gtar on the client a

gtar error

2001-06-29 Thread Anthony Valentine
Hello Everyone! I have had good success in finishing the compile of Amanda and now have it installed. I am however getting an error from amdump concerning gtar. Here it is: FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: sbs.sbsala /home lev 0 FAILED [/usr/bin/gtar returned 2] Amdump writes the image to

Re: big filesystem

2001-06-29 Thread John R. Jackson
> duchamp.to /Local/Users lev 0 FAILED [mesg read: Connection reset by peer] This says the client side (or your firewall) closed the connection while dumper (on the tape machine) was trying to read the image. First, I'd recommend upgrading to the "real" 2.4.2p2. What you're running is 18 mont

Re: Problems backing up

2001-06-29 Thread John R. Jackson
>Does this help any further? ... Not really. >or is there any way in which I can see at which >particular file it hangs itself? It's not necessarily hanging on a particular file. It could be that after some "random" period, your network dies (for that connection), or any number of other probl

Re: Too many filesystems to AMANDA?

2001-06-29 Thread John R. Jackson
>GNUTAR /var/xxx// 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 1 >exclude-file=*hh.yy.zz* ** Two questions about this part of the file. First, was the line really split like above, or is that just an artifact of you getting the data into the E-mail? Second, I realize (or assume) you changed the da

Alternative prefix and sysconfigdir problem

2001-06-29 Thread Dan Melomedman
I would like to install AMANDA into --prefix=/usr/local/amanda, but after installation the configuration files still want to be in /usr/local/amanda/etc/amanda/DailySet1, which is just plain fugly. I tried --with-configdir and --with-sysconfigdir options, but neither help, all executables sti

big filesystem

2001-06-29 Thread Sandra Panesso
Hi Everybody: Again I have problems with another filesystem is not too big but the machine is slow and it is outside the firewall. I had this problem before and I increased the firewall idle to 60 minutes and I used as dumptype "comp-server" (compression fast but on the tape server)and it worked

Re: amrecover and index record

2001-06-29 Thread frank
On 29 Jun, John R. Jackson wrote: >>-rw---1 root root20008 Jun 29 09:27 20010629_0.gz > > Why is it owned by root? What user is amindexd running as (look at your > inetd.conf or xinetd config file)? amindexd is running as root. I have to do my dump as root because I use tar

Re: amrecover and index record

2001-06-29 Thread John R. Jackson
># ll /var/lib/amanda/gilsdorf/index/pinguin.gilsdorf.de/_etc >drwxr-sr-x2 root root 64 Jun 29 09:27 . >drwxr-sr-x3 root root 55 Jun 29 09:27 .. >-rw---1 root root20008 Jun 29 09:27 20010629_0.gz Why is it owned by root? What user is aminde

Re: Too many filesystems to AMANDA?

2001-06-29 Thread Enrique Rodríguez Lázaro
"John R. Jackson" wrote: > > >amandad.20010626104712.debug > >... > >GNUTAR //x.x.es/Cinetsrv 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 1 > >[several more] > >[...] > > > > It's those last few lines before the "" that are important. > Could you post a sample of them? > > Also if you copy all the GNUTAR

Problems backing up

2001-06-29 Thread Robert Hoekstra
amstatus gives me this interesting news:   --- Using /usr/local/etc/amanda/hosting2/amdump from Fri Jun 29 12:24:55 MET DST 2001   cobalt01.somewhere.nl:/etc   0    2624k finished (12:25:18)cobalt01.somewhere.nl:/home  0  162630

Re: Off-site backup by extra tapes

2001-06-29 Thread John R. Jackson
>My plan is to get a second rack of tapes, and set tapecycle to 20. >Then every time Amanda gets through the current rack, I'll swap it >with the other one and take it off site. If I forget or am unable to >get the off-site rack on time, the worst that happens is a backup or >two sit on the holdi

Re: Excluding hosts from amcheck?

2001-06-29 Thread Johannes Niess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Knut A. Syed) writes: > Is it possible to exclude some of the hosts listed in disklist from > amcheck? > > I have some laptops which I do not want to be warned about if they are > not connected during amcheck. Knut, Unless you patch amcheck for a regexp parameter (or similar

Re: dds3 or dds4?

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Strickland
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 08:55:04AM +0200, Christoph Sold wrote: > > > Tom Strickland schrieb: > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 06:28:24PM +0200, Christoph Sold wrote: > > > Tom Strickland schrieb: > > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:58:28PM +0200, Christoph Sold wrote: > > > > > Tom Strickland schrieb

Re: amrecover and index record

2001-06-29 Thread frank
etting up estimates for pinguin.gilsdorf.de:/etc pinguin.gilsdorf.de:/etc overdue 11502 days for level 0 11502 days are 31 years ??? Same file: GENERATING SCHEDULE: note.gilsdorf.de /etc 11502 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 10565 352 pinguin.gilsdorf.de /etc 11502 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 10445 348 ---

Excluding hosts from amcheck?

2001-06-29 Thread Knut A. Syed
Is it possible to exclude some of the hosts listed in disklist from amcheck? I have some laptops which I do not want to be warned about if they are not connected during amcheck. ~kas -- Knut A. Syéd Senior Executive Officer, Department of Information Technology Norwegian School of Economics and

Re: amanda failure following upgrade

2001-06-29 Thread Brian Cuttler
John, For all three clients amcheck reported success. For Bali, I removed bali.ph.albany.edu from the tables, it seems that was interfering with bali.wadsworth.org which I don't really understand as my /etc/resolv.conf is correct and bali was defined correctly in both DNS and NIS tables. As fa