Re: 2.4.4b1 cygwin client and specifying DLEs with spaces...

2003-02-11 Thread John R. Jackson
>Hi! This is probably a really easily answered question, but I'm not having >any luck finding it (probably going blind)... The answer is easy, you're just not going to like it :-). >I've got the 2.4.4b1 client set up on a cygwin machine. The backup is going >well, but in order to create a DLE,

Re: question - process hung

2003-02-11 Thread John R. Jackson
>It didn't ask for change tape, but no progress. >... >In addition, I got the similar problem yesterday: >I ran 'amdump'. The system asked for change tape after while. >I inserted a tape and pressed return, but the process was hung. >There was no tape device activity. >I had to interrupted the proc

Re: exclude a sub directory

2003-02-11 Thread John R. Jackson
>I just added to exclude list for that entry several sub directories and >now it looks like: > >/home/max> cat .amanda.excludes >/home/max/o/mprj/PDF >/home/max/o/mprj/NMT >... You might want to get a copy of Amanda 2.4.3 and read docs/EXCLUDE (which you can do without installing anything). Excl

Re: changer problems when running from cron

2003-02-11 Thread John R. Jackson
>>>we wrote our own request() function. >> >> >> And what's in your version of the function? My guess is it is not >> waiting long enough for the tape to go ready. >> >> What's in /tmp/amanda/changer.debug? >AFAIK, if I'm invoking amcheck, then this programm starts the >changer-script and wait

Re: another chg-zd-mtx problem

2003-02-11 Thread John R. Jackson
>amcheck-server: could not get changer info: badly formed result from >changer: "/usr/lib/amanda/chg-zd-mtx: line 151: [: : integer expression >expected" You neglected to mention what version of Amanda you're using, but this was a known problem with chg-zd-mtx a while back. I don't think it was e

amtape and amlabel not reading labels

2003-02-11 Thread Michael Robbert
I have two amanda configurations for two different tape changers and when I run amtape or amlabel on one them the labels are not read from the tapes, but seemingly taken from memory somewhere. The changer this isn't working is an HP SureStore 24x6 that used to work fine until I had to re-do the con

question - process hung

2003-02-11 Thread David . Lee
I ran 'amdump' to backup multiple hosts. The process was hung. It didn't ask for change tape, but no progress. Running 'amstatus' always show the following. ... dumping : 10k 9903410k ( 0.00%) ( 0.00%) dumped : 23 11569550k 11569424k (100.00%) ( 53.88%) wait for

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 15:38, John Cunningham wrote: [...] >I'm guessing that I'm looking at recompiling the >kernal - I was really trying to avoid that... Why? Once one has a valid config, its relatively painless with the right script. I'll email you mine John. >How can I tell for sure

Re: Tape and disk mirror configuration

2003-02-11 Thread Milos Brkic
John, I have been away for ~week, and I am just getting back to this problem. Thanks for the response, however, this is exactly what I have seen already. I need some more details on the procedure/process. Here are some details on what I have done, and the behaviour that

Re: another chg-zd-mtx problem

2003-02-11 Thread Eric Sproul
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 14:41, Pete Poggione wrote: > I get an error trying to access /dev/sg2 as the Amanda user so I had to > set /sbin/mtx to run as suid root. That seemed to take care of that > issue (if anyone has a better idea let me know) Pete, This is not wise-- with suid root, any non-privi

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread John Cunningham
--- Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 at 12:36pm, John Cunningham > wrote > > > --- Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Do you know exactly how this changer is set up? > > > Does the changer have a > > > separate SCSI ID from the tape drive

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread John Cunningham
Thanks - I've recompiled before, but this is a production machine with 131 days uptime (it's almost a pride thing to not reboot) - I will plan on doing this tonight (really, really late). -John --- Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 at 12:38pm, John Cunningham >

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 at 12:38pm, John Cunningham wrote > I'm guessing that I'm looking at recompiling the > kernal - I was really trying to avoid that... > > How can I tell for sure? If your changer is on the same ID, different LUN from your tape drive, then you'll need to recompile the kernel.

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 at 12:36pm, John Cunningham wrote > --- Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you know exactly how this changer is set up? > > Does the changer have a > > separate SCSI ID from the tape drive, or is it on a > > different LUN? Are > > you having any terminat

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 13:48, John Cunningham wrote: >I know it's been a while and I bet you weren't >expecting to hear back from me yet. Unfortunately I > had to put my time elsewhere - but I've been keeping > up with the group and suggestions to my problem. > >From what I can tell of my /va

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread John Cunningham
--- Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 at 10:48am, John Cunningham > wrote > > > >From what I can tell of my /var/log/dmesg file my > > > autoloader is on /dev/st0 - which is odd because > mtx > > doesn't seem to agree. > > mtx needs to talk to an sg device,

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread John Cunningham
Sorry about the double message - sent prematurely before... --- Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 at 10:48am, John Cunningham > wrote > > > >From what I can tell of my /var/log/dmesg file my > > > autoloader is on /dev/st0 - which is odd because > mtx > > doe

Re: Anyone backing up Microsoft Exchange Server?

2003-02-11 Thread Leonid Mamtchenkov
Jeff Borders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: JB> Most commercial backup softwares have an optional exchange module and JB> open files module that does this. I was wondering if anyone had worked JB> through this with amanda. I don't see anything on google or the FAQ JB> about this. MS Exchange is rath

another chg-zd-mtx problem

2003-02-11 Thread Pete Poggione
If this problem is addressed somewhere else in the mail list archives I apologize in advance. I have not been able to find anything that helps me solve this problem after 3 days of searching and fiddling... THE HISTORY: I have had Amanda configured and running on this server with a single interna

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 at 10:48am, John Cunningham wrote > >From what I can tell of my /var/log/dmesg file my > autoloader is on /dev/st0 - which is odd because mtx > doesn't seem to agree. mtx needs to talk to an sg device, not an st device. > when I do the same with sg0: (mtx -f /dev/sg0 inqu

Re: SCSI Autoloader setup

2003-02-11 Thread John Cunningham
I know it's been a while and I bet you weren't expecting to hear back from me yet. Unfortunately I had to put my time elsewhere - but I've been keeping up with the group and suggestions to my problem. >From what I can tell of my /var/log/dmesg file my autoloader is on /dev/st0 - which is odd

exclude a sub directory

2003-02-11 Thread Constantin Skorodumov
Hello, I use amanda Amanda-2.4.2 on RH 6.2 Works fine a year. Now I have one home directory about 48Gb (/home/max) and I have to split it to separate entries in disklist file. My idea was very simple. I just added to exclude list for that entry several sub directories and now it looks like: /ho

Re: amrecover: No index records for disk for specified date

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 05:31:04PM +0100, Toralf Lund wrote: > I'm getting error message > > No index records for disk for specified date > > when trying to recover a certain DLE using amrecover (version 2.4.3.) The > full output from the session + some of the debug messages are included > be

amrecover: No index records for disk for specified date

2003-02-11 Thread Toralf Lund
I'm getting error message No index records for disk for specified date when trying to recover a certain DLE using amrecover (version 2.4.3.) The full output from the session + some of the debug messages are included below. The index looks good to me; I have # ls -lR /dumps/amanda/ks/index/m

Re: The Old Selfcheck Issue

2003-02-11 Thread Brian Cuttler
Brad, Stupid problems I've run into. Assuming you have both DNS and NIS/NIS+ services enabled. /etc/nsswitch.conf (Solaris, don't know if redhat had this) wasn't using "files" just "NIS". Check the equiv in your OS and see, also make sure that the server information for both services are providi

Re: NAK: amandad busy

2003-02-11 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 at 5:06pm, justin m. clayton wrote > > > I've been receiving this error on some, but not always all, of my hosts > > during amcheck. What could be causing this issue? Which logs are most > > likely to be housing the magic info

Re: The Old Selfcheck Issue

2003-02-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On 11 Feb 2003 at 8:47am, Brad wrote > Thanks to all for the help. Still no luck. I'm seeing the below libwrap > errors in the logs. hosts.allow has entries for 127.0.0.1 and the > localhost's fqdn, but still no go. Here is my hosts.allow file: > > ALL: 127.0.0.1 > ALL: 128.173.141.0/255.255.255.

Re: question - backup up level

2003-02-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 at 6:56pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > After ran 'amdump' (gnutar is the utility), I saw hosts got different lavel > of > backup. I don't know why. > How to control backup level? ie, all hosts backup level 0. > The following is the summary of 'amdump': This is normal. Amanda tr

Re: The Old Selfcheck Issue

2003-02-11 Thread Brad
Yeah, I've restarted it several times. I've reordered the hosts.allow file too just to see if that would make a difference, but it doesn't. Thanks for the tip though. On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 09:41, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On 11 Feb 2003 at 8:47am, Brad wrote > > > Thanks to all for the help. S

Re: NAK: amandad busy

2003-02-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 at 5:06pm, justin m. clayton wrote > I've been receiving this error on some, but not always all, of my hosts > during amcheck. What could be causing this issue? Which logs are most > likely to be housing the magic info I need to solve this? If there's already an amandad runnin

Re: gotchas to consider when upgrading from 2.4.2 to 2.4.3?

2003-02-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 at 6:24pm, Mark Stosberg wrote > At my Amanda installation, we have a server and several clients all > running 2.4.2p2. I would like to upgrade at least the server to take > advantage of some of the features in 2.4.3. I have some questions for > veterans of this upgrade: > >

Re: The Old Selfcheck Issue

2003-02-11 Thread Brad
Thanks to all for the help. Still no luck. I'm seeing the below libwrap errors in the logs. hosts.allow has entries for 127.0.0.1 and the localhost's fqdn, but still no go. Here is my hosts.allow file: ALL: 127.0.0.1 ALL: 128.173.141.0/255.255.255.0 ALL: 128.173.203.0/255.255.255.0 ALL: 128.173.20

Re First Time Changer User

2003-02-11 Thread David Flood
Thanks to Jon, Gene, Chris, Joshua, Jay and Liam for responding last week. I did get the changer set up, turns out I just had to uncomment two lines in sgen.conf and reboot. Well it would have been if the changer's default SCSI id was not the same as the CD drive in solaris but once I got tha

Re: Problems with reiserfs?

2003-02-11 Thread Niall O Broin
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 07:53, Rainer Hofmann wrote: > Is reiserfs the problem? The amanda version installed on the backup server > is amanda-2.4.1p1-29. On a different machine I'm running ext3 which is > backed up properly on the same backup server. What's your backup method - dump or tar ?

Re: Problems with reiserfs?

2003-02-11 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi, i guess you are trying to use dump for these filesystems, aren't you? this will simply not work. dump is a tool exclusively designed for ext2, you are very lucky if it works for ext3. switch over to use tar, and all should be ok. Christoph Rainer Hofmann schrieb: Hi, I've setup a new workstat

Re: changer problems when running from cron

2003-02-11 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi, First guess: double check your path statements in cron. If programs/scripts work from commandline but not from cron most times a needed part of the $PATH env-variable is missing, so a part of your script/command can't be executed. And this is not necesarryly reported back to you. Christoph Mic

Problems with reiserfs?

2003-02-11 Thread Rainer Hofmann
Hi, I've setup a new workstation to be integrated in daily backup cycles. amcheck doesn't show any problems. Access is granted. But when it comes to amdump the following error message turns up in report file: FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: pc034 /usr lev 0 FAILED [disk /usr offline on p

Re: changer problems when running from cron

2003-02-11 Thread Michael Bretterklieber
Hi, John R. Jackson schrieb: we wrote our own request() function. And what's in your version of the function? My guess is it is not waiting long enough for the tape to go ready. What's in /tmp/amanda/changer.debug? AFAIK, if I'm invoking amcheck, then this programm starts the changer-scrip