[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The server is reporting that client down, so I checked and noticed that
the FBSD port for the amanda-client did not install amindexd or
amidxtaped, although it did install amandad. Are all 3 needed for a
client?
No, for client only amandad is needed.
--
Toomas Aas
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Toomas Aas wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The server is reporting that client down, so I checked and noticed that
> > the FBSD port for the amanda-client did not install amindexd or
> > amidxtaped, although it did install amandad. Are all 3 needed for a
> > client?
>
Ian Turner wrote:
On Monday 11 September 2006 01:48, Stephen Carville wrote:
I've been using Amanda for about five years now. The only problems I've
ever had are because a single dumps has to fit on a single tape.
If you upgrade to Amanda 2.5.x, then you can instruct Amanda to split dumps
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:48:08PM -0700, Stephen Carville wrote:
I've been using Amanda for about five years now. The only problems I've
ever had are because a single dumps has to fit on a single tape. I
usually solved this by using tar, client side compression, and break
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting the amanda 2.5.1 server installed on Solaris
9. It always gets hung during "make install" when it gets to
restore-src. The client-only install works fine. I tried the server
install on a couple of different Solaris 9 boxes with the same error.
2.5.0p2 installed ju
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 at 6:59am, Stephen Carville wrote
Ian Turner wrote:
If you upgrade to Amanda 2.5.x, then you can instruct Amanda to split dumps
across tapes; so you can make your partitions as large as you like, and
just use as many tapes as are required.
AFAICT, this doesn't really sp
On 2006-09-13 15:59, Stephen Carville wrote:
Ian Turner wrote:
On Monday 11 September 2006 01:48, Stephen Carville wrote:
I've been using Amanda for about five years now. The only problems I've
ever had are because a single dumps has to fit on a single tape.
If you upgrade to Amanda 2.5.x,
P.S., I did a "make uninstall" and "make distclean" on the 2.5.0p2
version before trying to install 2.5.1.
Thanks,
Ray
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee, Raymond
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:15 AM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Su
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:29:38AM -0500, Lee, Raymond wrote:
> P.S., I did a "make uninstall" and "make distclean" on the 2.5.0p2
> version before trying to install 2.5.1.
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee, Ray
I'm just completing the first bare-metal recovery I've experienced in my
six years as a system administrator. A backplane seemed to fail and
wiped out two disks of a four-disk RAID-5 array. After replacing all the
suspect parts, I followed this process to restore the host:
--Installed an IDE hard d
Replying to my own post (sorry, but I'm getting desperate here), I took
the advice of the FAQ-O-Matic and installed lsof and ran this command:
su-2.05b# lsof -uamanda
There was no output. Should there have been? Does this mean that amandad
is not running? This is what I have in my /etc/inetd.
Zembower, Kevin wrote:
I thought that after all this, I'd be done. However, I'm discovering
pockets of files and directories that seem to have never made it to the
backup tapes in the first place. Some examples:
--/service/tinydns, dnscache, qmail-send, ... All these were soft links
to the files
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Replying to my own post (sorry, but I'm getting desperate here), I took
> the advice of the FAQ-O-Matic and installed lsof and ran this command:
>
> su-2.05b# lsof -uamanda
>
> There was no output. Should there have been? Does this mean that amandad
> is not running?
ambiance still refuses to back up:
ambiance.med.utah.edu sdc1 lev 0 FAILED [cannot read header: got 0 instead
of 32768]
ambiance.med.utah.edu sdc1 lev 0 FAILED [too many dumper retry: "[request
failed: timeout waiting for ACK]"]
ambiance.med.utah.edu sdc1 lev 0 FAILED [cannot read
The command you should run is:
lsof -I :amanda
Which should show the inetd/xinetd process listening on the amanda port
(UDP port 10080). The output should look something like this:
ritcdx> lsof -i :amanda
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
inetd 1285913 root
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Frank Smith wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Replying to my own post (sorry, but I'm getting desperate here), I took
> > the advice of the FAQ-O-Matic and installed lsof and ran this command:
> >
> > su-2.05b# lsof -uamanda
> >
> > There was no output. Should there have
Zembower, Kevin wrote:
> I'm just completing the first bare-metal recovery I've experienced in my
> six years as a system administrator. A backplane seemed to fail and
> wiped out two disks of a four-disk RAID-5 array. After replacing all the
> suspect parts, I followed this process to restore the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Frank Smith wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Replying to my own post (sorry, but I'm getting desperate here), I took
>>> the advice of the FAQ-O-Matic and installed lsof and ran this command:
>>>
>>> su-2.05b# lsof -uamanda
>>>
>>> There was
Thanks, Jon. That did the trick. I already had ncurses installed, but
running configure --without-termcap, etc. still tried to use termcap.
So I uninstalled termcap and ran configure again. The make install ran
clean this time. amrecover is working fine, so I guess it's all good.
Thanks,
Ray
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Frank Smith wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Frank Smith wrote:
> >
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Replying to my own post (sorry, but I'm getting desperate here), I took
> >>> the advice of the FAQ-O-Matic and installed lsof and ran this command
Frank and Alex, thanks for replying. Alex, you're right, I believe,
GNUtar behaves differently than tar with respect to symbolic links, and
I'm using GNUtar:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib$ tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.14
Frank, all my entries look like this one for sda2 (root):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/va
Sorry for all the whining...it turned out the "host down" was the same
reverse DNS problem that the other amanda client was returning, but since
the error message was totally different, it baffled. I hooked the server
back up to the old network and it worked fine.
2 more minor issues:
I'm getti
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0400, Zembower, Kevin wrote:
> Frank and Alex, thanks for replying. Alex, you're right, I believe,
> GNUtar behaves differently than tar with respect to symbolic links, and
> I'm using GNUtar:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib$ tar --version
> tar (GNU tar) 1.14
>
L
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:07:52AM -0700, Stephen Carville wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:48:08PM -0700, Stephen Carville wrote:
> >
> >>I've been using Amanda for about five years now. The only problems I've
> >>ever had are because a single dumps has to fit on a singl
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:47, Zembower, Kevin wrote:
>Frank and Alex, thanks for replying. Alex, you're right, I believe,
>GNUtar behaves differently than tar with respect to symbolic links, and
>I'm using GNUtar:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib$ tar --version
>tar (GNU tar) 1.14
>
1.14 is bust
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 15:02, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0400, Zembower, Kevin wrote:
>> Frank and Alex, thanks for replying. Alex, you're right, I believe,
>> GNUtar behaves differently than tar with respect to symbolic links, and
>> I'm using GNUtar:
>> [EMAIL
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Sorry for all the whining...it turned out the "host down" was the same
>reverse DNS problem that the other amanda client was returning, but since
>the error message was totally different, it baffled. I hooked the server
>back up to th
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:54:13PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> ERROR: label FULL0 match labelstr but it not listed in the tapelist file.
>(expecting a new tape)
>
> I thought that amanda would simply create a new tapelist...I deleted the
> old one because it was years old. Do I n
Using amanda 2.4.5 with gnu-tar.This has probably been already answered somewhere but I can't find an answer in the list or the wikiIs there a way to list the content of an amanda tape (without having to load and read the tape) ?
Someone has lost a file, and he does not know on which host and o
I have run into the exact same problem on a client that is running
Debian (Etch) linux using tar version 1.15.91 (and amanda 2.5.0p2-1).
I have now noticed, given your message, that things worked fine with
the first Debian tar 1.15.91 package but, when a revised tar 1.15.91
package was released end
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:25:56PM -0400, Guy Dallaire wrote:
> Using amanda 2.4.5 with gnu-tar.
>
> This has probably been already answered somewhere but I can't find an answer
> in the list or the wiki
>
> Is there a way to list the content of an amanda tape (without having to load
> and re
Thanks !2006/9/13, Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:25:56PM -0400, Guy Dallaire wrote:> Using amanda 2.4.5 with gnu-tar.>> This has probably been already answered somewhere but I can't find an answer> in the list or the wiki
>> Is there a way to list the content of an
32 matches
Mail list logo
