On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:24:19AM -0700, Sean Noonan wrote:
snip
That looks like amrestore isn't finding the dump file on the tape and is
running off the end of tape.
I'm puzzled by the missing file header block. That implies that the
tape isn't positioned at the start of a
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 07:29:02AM +0200, Sebastian Kösters wrote:
Hi!
A short question.
I would like to have the possibility to recover a backup thats 14 Days old.
I want to use virtuel tapes and a tape-changer for this.
Every 7 Days Amanda should do a full-backup.
Am i right that
to follow when you reply either after
the comments or in line with the comments.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Jon LaBadie
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 08:34
An: amanda-users@amanda.org
Betreff: Re: Question about
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:46:45PM +0200, Sebastian Kösters wrote:
I forgot to say.
I did that because my backup size is between 40 and 160 GB each tape, every
day. So i set it to 300 to guarantee that the end of the tape is never
reached and that i do not get the error tape full.
Hope
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:06:35PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:42:12AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Look at the various bump* options in amanda.conf -- they control when
amanda bumps an incremental up a level. Theoretically it can go to 9
(just like the
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:15:55PM -0700, Sean Noonan wrote:
Hello,
Hoping someone can help me with the magical incarnation to restore files.
Box is running FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE. Amanda is v2.5.0p2,1 installed from the
ports collection. Server name is freebee. Disk name is aacd0s1f. Tape
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:13:08PM -0400, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing estimates that are way off with the result that level
0s and 1s use the same space on tapes and now obviously that
throws the balance completely and every amdump eats through a lot
of tapes.
I'm
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 09:35:13AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
freebee# amrestore -p /dev/nsa0 freebee aacd0s1f | gzip -d | restore -ivf -
Verify tape and initialize maps
amrestore: missing file header block
amrestore: 2: skipping freebee.aacd0s1e.20060721.0
amrestore: 10: reached
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 08:11:02PM +0100, Laurence Darby wrote:
Thanks everyone for your help, especially you Anne, as I based my
setup on what you've done. I'm sorry it's taken so long, but there's a
lot of stuff to know, and the documentation isn't exactly in the same
league as
Thx,
gil
Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 02:07:42PM
-0700, gil naveh wrote:
Thanks for all the help, but I have a problem to restore the files.
When I type:
root@ # dd if=/dev/rmt/0n ibs=64k | ufsrestore if -
I recieve the following
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:46:51AM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
Today the server disk went out of space because the tapestatus file grew over
several GiGs. It seems to be related with upgrading amanda to 2.5.0p2. The
contents are lines like tape status = Any clues?
I'm unfamiliar
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:21:50AM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
Hi. I'm forwarding this mail that ought to go to amanda-users in the first
place.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: upgrading amanda to 2.5.0
Date: Thursday 20 July 2006 16:27
From: Rodrigo Ventura
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 04:17:37PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
On Friday 21 July 2006 15:58, Gene Heskett wrote:
I'm just as puzzled, I now have the latest 2.5.1p1-20060719 installed
and I have no such file either.
Would the OP please supply the full path to this file?
The filename
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 04:42:08PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
On Friday 21 July 2006 16:29, Jon LaBadie wrote:
From the low volume of comments about chg-scsi on this list
it seems few sites are using that changer. Thus our unfamiliarity
with its config and log files. Sorry
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 05:34:28PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 22:39, Frank Smith wrote:
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 at 9:59pm, Anne Wilson wrote
On Thursday 20 July 2006 21:44, Frank Smith wrote:
Keep in mind that if you restore a directory
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:16:38AM -0700, Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
Dear all,
say your amanda backup server itself dies, and you need to
reinstall/recreate it from scratch.
You want the new backup server to have available the information needed to
find and restore data from
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
On Friday 21 July 2006 17:18, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I hesitate to say they are better. But perhaps more popular
are the scripts based on using the mtx command, either chg-mtx
or more commonly the newer chg-zd-mtx.
Thanks. I
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 04:05:42PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 at 3:57pm, Ronald Vincent Vazquez wrote
Running 2.4.5_p1 on Gentoo Linux (no tape spanning, right?). Ok, let's
say that all images but the last one have been written to tape. The last
image to be
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:55:02PM -0400, Sean Walmsley wrote:
This post documents our experience with the version 2.5.0p2 tape spanning
option in the hopes that someone has suggestions for getting it working
acceptably. Even a me too would be useful information.
System info:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 04:32:04PM -0400, Ronald Vincent Vazquez wrote:
On Fri, July 21, 2006 3:57 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:44:30PM -0400, Ronald Vincent Vazquez wrote:
Hello:
Here is what we have done at our site. We re-mastered DSL (Damn Small
Linux
Apologies,
I said something in my earlier post about your not using
a split_diskbuffer.
My error. Ignore those comments.
--
Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:35:06AM +0200, Thomas Ginestet wrote:
Hi list,
In order to backup a Zope database, I would like to use star with
pre-post processes to stop restart the server. I've read the doc about
how to use wrapper but i'm still in difficulty.
What i've done for the
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:26:57AM -0400, Patrick Hawley wrote:
Hi,
I've got three workstations I'm trying to install and configure amanda
for.
My tape host is a Solaris 8 machine and I have two clients with Solaris 8
on one and Solaris 9 on the other.
I was able to build and install the
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:46:18AM -0600, Chris Cameron wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 17:36 -0700, Kevin Till wrote:
what is the amanda entry in /etc/inet/inetd.conf?
amanda dgram udp waitroot/opt/amanda/libexec/amandad
amandad
Try truss /opt/amanda/libexec/amandad
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 02:07:42PM -0700, gil naveh wrote:
Thanks for all the help, but I have a problem to restore the files.
When I type:
root@ # dd if=/dev/rmt/0n ibs=64k | ufsrestore if -
I recieve the following error message:
read: Invalid argument
0+0 records in
0+0
Forgot one comment.
After mt rewind, you have to mt fsf #, where # is a tape file number,
to get to the start of the #'th dump on the tape.
Then if you had followed the suggested reading, that tapefile
contains a file header that must be skipped. It does no good
to do a skip=1 to the first tape
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 11:14:39AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
I haven't had a chance to test the script yet, but since I ran across
this thread about changes in GNU tar from the Debian developers list
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg01108.html default
Amanda processes write debug files to /tmp/amanda
in my installation. On client systems, these
files are clearly related to client activities.
But as the amanda server is typically also a client,
the debug files from both types of processes end
up in the same place.
Is there a convienent way to
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:04:51PM -0500, Steve Linabery wrote:
I searched the archives; forgive me if I missed something obvious.
I have roughly 12GB of space on my tape. I'm trying to do amflush to get the
following DLE out of my holding disk:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] holdingdisk2]# find -ls |
I'm using the 3-hole label template.
Amanda version is 2.5.0p2 from zmanda on Fedora 4.
I'm taping to vtapes and tape spanning is turned on.
Though I seldom exceed one tape the dumps are still
split into tape_splitsize chunks.
It appears to me that the File # column in the report
is meaningless,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:32:01AM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
The following occurred while compiling with the values you suggested:
snip
make install-data-hook
chown operator /usr/local/man/man8/amanda.8
chgrp operator /usr/local/man/man8/amanda.8
chown operator
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:58:17PM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
Kevin Till wrote:
Mike Allen wrote:
try configure with --with-tcpportrange=5,50100
--with-udpportrange=512,1023 ... and recompile.
Open the corresponding ports in the firewall setup.
The reason udp port 34932 was
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:19:12PM -0700, Brian Neu wrote:
I'm confused.
Why does this command eject the tape and then ask for me to insert a tape
into slot 2?
-sh-3.1$ amtape DailySet1 show
changer: got exit: 0 str: 1 99 1
changer_query: changer return was 99 1
changer_query:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:41:37PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
I want to know what the exclude list should look like to make sure I exclude
all files with these extensions in any directory/subdirectory contained
under the disklist entries:
.ora
.dbf
.dmp
.dmp.gz.xx
It seems
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 08:13:40AM -0500, James Wilson wrote:
body bgcolor=#ff text=#00
What I meant before the backup is that I ran amdump manually waited for
about a minute because it does the estimated size, then I ran amstatus.
Then I ran amstatus again when it finished I do have
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 10:54:07AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
No there really is a difference between excluding /foo, ./foo, and foo.
As you are backing up ., /foo will not match anything.
Of course
./foo will match any foo in the top level directory .
foo will match any foo in any
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:10:34PM -0400, McGraw, Robert P. wrote:
Well I am getting a little closer.
My cygwin client is a Window2003 server.
When I do a amcheck from the amanda server to the cygwin client behind the
firewall I now get the following in the events log on the cygwin
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 05:34:50PM -0500, James Wilson wrote:
Here is an amstatus before and after the backup. Before it estimated
1231m but after it only backed up 171m. Howcome amanda isn't backing up
everything?
amstatus is not the tool to use.
After a dump you should receive a report
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:47:22AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
When AMANDA attempts to exclude a file or directory it does so relative to
the area being archived. For example if /var is in your disklist and you
want to exclude /var/log/somefile, then your exclude file would contain
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 07:03:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded the first of our Amanda installations to 2.5.0p2 ]
and found an unwelcome surprise: amcheck no longer reports tape
problems
via e-mail from an amcheck run out of the Amanda user's crontab file.
We have
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:57:42PM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote:
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:07:11:11:59:30-0400] scribed:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Nathan Weston wrote:
snip /
As for the second problem, I don't see anything in the .debug files that
gives
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:29:14AM +0100, Laurence Darby wrote:
Hi,
I'm sure this question has been asked many times before, but I couldn't
see it in the Faq-O-Matic.
Bascially I have a 30GB directory (/home) and 50 4.7GB DVD-Rs. Is there
any support in Amanda for backing up to DVD-Rs?
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:38:16AM -0400, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
Just following up on my own message. I'll try and be more succinct;
maybe all my debugging info turned people off:
What does
8
Extracting files using tape drive /dev/nrsa0 on host
aphrodite.acf.aquezada.com.Load
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 06:14:54AM -0700, Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
When you run amstatus config while a dump is active, does it show you a
progress report (for want of a better term)?
The man command, or simply try it, is your friend here.
From the man page:
DESCRIPTION
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:03:38AM -0400, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
So whatever was fed by amrecover to the restore program did not
appear to be created by the corresponding dump program.
Do you use dump/restore in your amanda dumptypes or gnutar?
I
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:07:32PM +0930, Jerlique Bahn wrote:
Yes, it will do a read of the entire tape. There is a config file option
called amrecover_do_fsf that if set to true will fsf your tape to the
correct spot if your drive supports it, which is much faster than a linear
read.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:14:19AM -0600, Graeme Humphries wrote:
Nicola Mauri wrote:
1) What kind of errors can amverify detect?
2) What kind of errors *cannot* amverify detect?
3) Does it make sense to schedule amverify after amdump every day?
4) Should we trust amverify results? Should
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Nathan Weston wrote:
I'm a first-time amanda user, trying to backup a linux machine and a few
windows shares. I went through the tutorial at
amanda.zmanda.com/quick-backup-setup.html, modifying things to fit my
setup. The linux machine seems to be
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:46:12AM -0700, Pavel Pragin wrote:
Example configuration (all of the files below need to be owned by user
amanda):
The AMANDA client software and Samba is installed on host
amanda_server_host. A share to be backed up called share is on PC
my-laptop. The share
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:08:27PM -0400, Nathan Weston wrote:
But, I seem to have found the source of the problem -- I'm running
Fedora Core 4 which has SELinux enabled by default. When I turn that
off, amcheck runs with no errors.
Is there an easy way to make amanda play nice with
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
I'm using Amanda 2.4.5 with FreeBSD 5.4.
1. Backups on the NATed side of our firewall work fine.
2. Our tape server is on the NATed side of firewall.
3. Backups through the firewall fail when I run AMCHECK.
The error
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:38:31PM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
I'm using Amanda 2.4.5 with FreeBSD 5.4.
1. Backups on the NATed side of our firewall work fine.
2. Our tape server is on the NATed side
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:57:48AM -0700, Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
I got these replies by email, which I think clear it up for me. Still not
sure about whether I can start from scratch by erasing the existing
hardware-compressed tapes, and then issuing mt -f /dev/nst0
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 12:47:15PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
Does anyone use or have knowledge of using LVM snapshots with Amanda
backups?
...
I'm just wondering what happens during the freeze - how freezing all
activity to and from the filesystem to reduce the risk of problems
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 05:11:50PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, everyone -
I would like to suggest an update for the answer to the Size Question, one
of the top ten questions at http://www.amanda.org/docs/topten.html. I have
also seen this question on the Zmanda forums; that is, how
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 10:49:22PM +0200, Peter Kunst wrote:
Hi list,
ever seen something like this in amstatus output ?
matrix:/var/lib/backuppc 0 planner: [hmm, disk was stranded on waitq]
This is a new debian box, which (guess it :) runs BackupPC, and was
taken into amanda's
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:42:14AM -0700, Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
Thanks to everyone for your replies.
Ok, so what I really wanted to do was to use software compression, and not
hardware compression.
Cyrille's suggestion sounds like what I need, but again I'm not sure
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 03:51:05PM -0400, Guy wrote:
We are currently using amanda 2.4.5p1 to backup a mix of Unix + Linux hosts.
Now, we need to backup HUGE (100 Gb) subversion repositories that reside on
a Windows XP box.
From what I have read, the SMB client seems flaky.
I only have
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 04:17:46AM -0700, Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
Dear all,
I just want to clarify something about compression:
My understanding is that you can use either software or hardware
compression, or can switch between the two if needed.
You can also use no
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:00:35AM -0500, Gordon J. Mills III wrote:
You can download it from:
http://www.zmanda.com/downloads.html
Thanks. I see they have added it. It wasn't there a few weeks ago.
I have downloaded it and installed it. Now the problem appears to be the
xinetd
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:34:24AM +0200, Cyrille Bollu wrote:
Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 30/06/2006 15:47:24 :
Sorry for asking but, why do you say backuping directly to tape is
slow?
I guess he's doing local backups (ie: The 700GB are not sent over the
network
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Luis Rodrigues wrote:
This seems to be a veeery old config.
It still uses parameter diskdir which is deprecated for
over 8 years now. Moreover in 2.5.0 is does't exist anymore.
Also the comments about infofile being a database filename
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 08:36:17AM -0700, Jeffrey Anderson wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 00:55, Luis Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting this on my backup report.
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATS TAPER
STATS HOSTNAME
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:30:57PM -0400, Byarlay, Wayne A. wrote:
Hi all, I want to specify estimate server in my dumptype definition in
my amanda.conf file; however, amanda doesn't seem to like it:
/etc/amanda/DailySet1/amanda.conf, line 68: dump type parameter
expected
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 01:53:56PM -0400, Scott R. Burns wrote:
It would appear I have my tape size set to be slightly larger than the tape
really is (HP DAT24x6 changer). The issue I have now is a dump failed for a
large DLE and is sitting on disk, this dump is just slightly larger than the
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 06:52:50AM -0400, Paul Graf wrote:
As Frank already noted, you are taping direct to tape,
not using your defined holding disk.
holdingdisk hd1 {
comment main holding disk
directory /tmp/amandahld # where the holding disk is
use 2 Mb# how
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:40:50AM -0700, Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
Dear all,
I think I may finally have cracked Amanda, but there are two things not
quite clear to me:
1. When you do an amrecover, do you HAVE to rewind the tape first? This
isn't a problem as such, I'm
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:46:56PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Hi,
i was unsuccessful finding an answer, so I turned here. Apologies if
this has been asked for a zillion times already:
In amanda 2.4.5 amcheck returned an error and sent a mail when the
tape did have a wrong labvel.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 07:14:22AM -0600, Christopher Davis wrote:
I'm trying to compile amand 2.5.0p2 on Solaris 10 -
Here's what I'm doing -
I'm running configure with the following options:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/amanda
--with-configdir=/usr/local/amanda/configs
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:11:51AM -0700, Sean Noonan wrote:
I keep getting these messages with every backup report:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
unixservername //windowsservername/sharename lev 0 STRANGE
and then a little later on:
FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:
/--
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 04:53:24PM -0400, Ronald Vázquez wrote:
I noticed that if you specify a DLE like: desktop.domain.com /
normal, this only backus up the device where the root of the file
system resides. To backup the other devices I used
desktop.domain.com md1 normal to
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:48:33PM -0400, Paul Graf wrote:
I've got a strange problem with my backups. I'm running Amanda 2.5 on FC4,
and the problem lies with one large directory that needs to be backed up.
It's over 700 gigs, so it has to span tapes. Eventually the backup will
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:49:10PM -0500, Frank Smith wrote:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
If I understand tape spanning correctly, and
if we are going direct to tape, which we are, you will need
at least 2 x 20GB for the split buffers. One being filled
and another dumping to tape.
Does
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:48:40AM -0400, Matt Emmott wrote:
user-tar != comp-user-tar
Oh, didn't know that.
And where's the user-tar dumptype?
}
define dumptype user-tar {
root-tar
comment user partitions dumped with tar
priority medium
}
So if I understand
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 05:56:16PM -0400, Ronald V. Vazquez wrote:
Hello list:
I wanted to find out if anyone out there would know the reason why would
amanda only back up half the data when the tape fits 3 times that amount.
200.0 Gig tape
60.2 gig of data
32.6 gig backed up
It
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:06:55PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 at 9:48am, Matt Emmott wrote
define dumptype user-tar {
root-tar
comment user partitions dumped with tar
priority medium
}
So if I understand correctly, I should add the compress line into
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:09:05AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Jon,
Stefan,
yup, fixing the execute access in the directory path seems to have
fixed the problem, I'm not only far ahead of where I was yesterday
but I have a file in work waiting to flush (I do still need more
work area as
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 05:01:44AM -0700, Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
Thanks very much for clarifying that to me.
Yes, I meant that (at least at present) all data will fit onto one tape for
every day of the week, i.e. if a full backup is done every day Monday to
Friday, then
Not certain of any of these comments,
but I'll make them anyway :)
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 01:53:24AM -0700, silpa kala wrote:
Hi,
Anybody help me out to understand the source code.I
given the information what i understood. Please
correct me if I am wrong.
Planner sends the request to
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:39:26AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Jon,
I'm sorry, I am still doing something wrong and need additional guideance.
It is apparently that I am still not utilizing the work area and need
to know which switch I set wrong, dispite (I'd thought) following your
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 05:46:27PM -0700, Robert Grey wrote:
I am setting up Amanda on a Gentoo box with an Overland LoaderXPress and
can't seem to get past an amcheck issue. The amdump operation works fine
but amcheck gives this error:
amdump is working but amcheck is not?
I'd first check
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 12:09:20PM -0400, Ronald Vincent Vazquez wrote:
Hello list:
Here is the scenario. Let say that the server that gets destroyed is the
tape server itself and we need a bare metal recovery. Now, we are
thinking about creating a server restore cd together which will
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:18:15PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Hello amanda users,
I'm confused as to why these dumps, where are late in to be
dumped today (there are 50 some entries in the disklist) are
not making use of the work area.
The current partition is only provide 10 Gig and
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:09:18PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Ronald Vincent Vazquez schrieb:
Hello:
I was wondering if anyone can tell me a way to cheat amanda to override
the expected tape. I am still running in test mode and tonight I want
to run the backup but starting
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:51:22AM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote:
Josef Wolf wrote:
If I have a collection of tapes from previous amanda backups,
is there a procedure for determining which set of tapes contain
a complete backup?
I'm assuming you don't have access to the
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:42:16AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
And the following command said I had no dumps to list :((
amadmin tstvt find -sort ldhk
It list all dump of host '-sort' and 'ldhk'.
Try 'amadmin tstvt find --sort ldhk'.
My bad reading
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:23:57AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 at 10:59pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Here's the complete report, now that it finally finished:
su-2.05a$ amtapetype -f /dev/nrsa0
Writing 256 Mbyte compresseable data: 92 sec
Writing 256 Mbyte
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:45:37AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
I have a new installation on Fedora Core 5, amanda 2.4.5p1-3.2. The
server can back itself up, and I can access the backups. The storage
device is an external hard drive.
I have just added a client to the setup. For its backups,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:01:52AM -0400, Ronald Vincent Vazquez wrote:
Hello list:
I have been looking for a way configure stinit for our unit. This is what
I have so far (missing manufacturer and model):
= stinit.def =
# PowerVault 124T LTO-2
manufacturer=?? model = ?? {
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:05:35AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:11:36AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Looking at the log files, I see a typical runtar log as follows:
--
runtar: debug 1 pid 6507 ruid 33 euid
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:05:35AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:11:36AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Looking at the log files, I see a typical runtar log as follows:
--
runtar: debug 1 pid 6507 ruid 33 euid
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:23:28AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:23:57AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 at 10:59pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Here's the complete report, now that it finally
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:31:01AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 12:55:15PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Forgot to mention, I looked through some old reports, from last month
when I was setting up a FC4 installation. Early on there were some
too many dumper retry
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:43:31AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 12:51:45PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
runtar is called from other programs and they write debug info to
things like sendsize and sendbackup. Anything interesting there?
Nothing that jumps out. Here's
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:07:40PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 02:06:28PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:43:31AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 12:51:45PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
runtar is called from other
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:26:53PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:50:58PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
What is in the client's amandad debug files? Anything of interest?
From the client:
--
amandad: debug 1 pid
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:16:02PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 17 June 2006 18:45, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 04:57:56PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
Scenario -
Backup server: borg
Two drives - source from hda backed up by amanda to hdb.
Requirement
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:43:04AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 at 2:40pm, Cyrille Bollu wrote
Does anybody knows about the --with-maxtapeblocksize used by RedHat ES
3.3?
I doubt it's used, but it's easy enough to find out -- download the SRPM
and look in the
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:08:49PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 19 June 2006 14:40, Matt Hyclak wrote:
I'm sure that the problems are being caused by conflicting/overriding
commands - it's just finding them that's the problem :-) I tried
commenting out the compress and index
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 12:11:26PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
Hi all,
Occasionaly I get the following errors after amdump:
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [label ISR006 or new tape not found in rack].
Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk.
Run amflush to flush them to tape.
The
801 - 900 of 2790 matches
Mail list logo
