RE: Tape order

2011-07-08 Thread McGraw, Robert P
Robert P > Cc: 'amanda-users@amanda.org' > Subject: Re: Tape order > > > % amadmin archive tape > The next Amanda run should go onto 6 new tapes. > The next 6 new tapes already labelled are: A00221, A00222, A00224, > A00225, A00226, A00223 > > Ha, they

Re: Tape order

2011-07-07 Thread McGraw, Robert P
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) From: Jean-Louis Martineau Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:21:48 PM To: McGraw, Robert P Cc: 'amanda-users@amanda.org' Subject: Re: Tape order % amadmin archive tape The next Amanda run

Re: Tape order

2011-07-07 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
quot; "31-36" property "load-poll" "0s poll 5s until 120s" device-property "BLOCK_SIZE" "1024k" device-property "LEOM" "true" } -Original Message- From: Jean-Louis Martineau [mailto:martin...@zmanda.com] Sent

RE: Tape order

2011-07-07 Thread McGraw, Robert P
until 120s" device-property "BLOCK_SIZE" "1024k" device-property "LEOM" "true" } > -----Original Message- > From: Jean-Louis Martineau [mailto:martin...@zmanda.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:20 PM > To: McGraw, Robert P > Cc: &

Re: Tape order

2011-07-07 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Always post which amanda release you are using! Try chg-robot for your changer. Jean-Louis On 07/07/2011 02:21 PM, McGraw, Robert P wrote: I am trying to determine what tape order amanda uses when requesting a reuse tape. My amanda.conf is configured to use slots 31-36 for my archive tapes.

RE: tape order

2006-10-18 Thread McGraw, Robert P.
sage- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Steve Wray > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 4:03 PM > To: amanda-users@amanda.org > Subject: Re: tape order > > > Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:44:53AM -0400, Steven Settl

Re: tape order

2006-10-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:03:09AM +1300, Steve Wray wrote: > > This has been bugging me for years. > ... > > I've been looking for a way to get amanda to try to predict which tape > it will want next in good time (a schedule for the next 3 days or so > would be ideal). No luck so far... Isn't

Re: tape order

2006-10-17 Thread Olivier Nicole
> I have 24 tapes and a 8 tape changer. For some reason, it is going > 13->16->15->14->17. How can I fix this? can i just force it to take 14 > after 13 by only having 14 in there when it's expecting 16? My tapecycle > is 10. On the sticker used on the tape, do a double numbering, one by Amanda

Re: tape order

2006-10-17 Thread Steve Wray
Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:44:53AM -0400, Steven Settlemyre wrote: >> I have 24 tapes and a 8 tape changer. For some reason, it is going >> 13->16->15->14->17. How can I fix this? can i just force it to take 14 >> after 13 by only having 14 in there when it's expecting 16? My

Re: tape order

2006-10-17 Thread Steven Settlemyre
right, but since I have 24 tapes and my dumpcycle is 1 week, I should never have to go that far back as to need these tapes. Jon LaBadie wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:44:53AM -0400, Steven Settlemyre wrote: I have 24 tapes and a 8 tape changer. For some reason, it is going 13->16->15->1

Re: tape order

2006-10-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:44:53AM -0400, Steven Settlemyre wrote: > I have 24 tapes and a 8 tape changer. For some reason, it is going > 13->16->15->14->17. How can I fix this? can i just force it to take 14 > after 13 by only having 14 in there when it's expecting 16? My tapecycle > is 10. As

Re: tape order

2006-10-17 Thread Michael Loftis
Forget about tape order. It's not important. AMANDA bases the order on what is expiring/expired. So just forget about tape order, it's going to get out of whack. Especially as you replace tapes due to wear. --On October 17, 2006 11:44:53 AM -0400 Steven Settlemyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote