Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Pavel Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I've just found out that our antivirus system doesn't process mail
anymore. There were about 120.000 mails in Postfix'es incoming queue and
Amavis was stuck with processing something with 'nomarch'.
Got some logs?
Nope.
That's what I'm talking about. Thanks alot. I'll try this on one MX and
see how things go for a week or two.
Cheers,
Gary V wrote:
Gordon wrote:
That makes sense. The primary MX gets much more traffic than then backup
MX, but I was hoping that Amavisd-new would not bother running spam
Pavel,
... and nomarch process is stuck. Probably broken archive. Shouldn't be
there a timeout on decompressor call?
amavisd-new-2.4.0 release notes:
- added ability to explicitly kill externally running decoder process or
a command-line virus scanner process if running for too long;
Mark
Jan,
I have the following rule in my amavis config to block undecipherable
archives:
# # block if any component can not be decoded (is encrypted or bad archive)
qr'(?# BLOCK IF UNDECIPHERABLE ) ^ (.*\t)? A=U (\t.*)? \z'xmi,
But when I send a corrupt test zip archive (if you want the
A release candidate for amavisd-new-2.4.2 is available at:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.2-rc1.tar.gz
Changes since -pre1:
incompatible with -pre1:
- config variable $penpals_threshold renamed to $penpals_threshold_low
other:
- added $penpals_threshold_high, few
Mark Martinec wrote:
Per,
The incoming servers ARE listed in @mynetworks, the line SPAM FROM
LOCAL ... is correct in a sense but not really interesting, obviously
ALL incoming mail passes throughthe MX's first.
You are right, the FROM LOCAL becomes useless information in such setup.
The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/05/2006 09:47:06 AM:
Mark wrote:
Chris,
I upgraded from SA 3.1.1 to SA 3.1.2 and I am now seeing the following
error message:
Jun 1 09:22:24 dent amavis[17593]: (17593-01) SA TIMED OUT,
backtrace:
at
Per olof,
... one could argue that it is a cosmetic issue and the first upstream
external server is present in the header information anyway.
How difficult would it be to make this an option in amavis?
Unlike SA which gets all its information from mail header,
amavisd-new tries very hard to
