[AMaViS-user] Amavisd-new and SA and Bayes

Hi Ive got two servers running amavisd-new using spamassassin both with equal MX preference, now im using bayes with mysql DB and my one box has a higher hit rate than the other , 1st = %35.6: BAYES_99=4.3 2nd = %87.7: BAYES_99=4.3 and obvisouly the server with the lower his rate is letting

[AMaViS-user] First public pre-release of amavisd-new-2.4.3 (-pre2)

The first public pre-release of amavisd-new 2.4.3 is available at: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.3-pre2.tar.gz It is primarily a maintenance release over 2.4.2 with fixes for known problems, although a couple of more straightforward features were added as well, mostly as

[AMaViS-user] [OT] amavis-stats 0.1.21 anyone?

I know this is OT, but I do have to ask... I've tried to get amavis-stats 0.1.21 up and running, but with no big success. I can't get it to show tabs and buttons. Anyone? If you feel it's too OT for the list, please respond privately. -- Anders Norrbring Norrbring Consulting

Re: [AMaViS-user] Different rule for outgoing mail

R.Smits, Difficult problem. I want to apply a different spamassassin rule to the outgoing mail stream. I know about the policy bank MYNETS. I want to block all the mail to the internet with a specific string in the subject. But I do not want to apply this rule to the incoming stream. You

[AMaViS-user] sa-learn vs spamassassin tests

# sa-learn -L --spam and spamassassin -L -r learn the same spam differently. SA version 3.13, using db or sql database, doesn't seem to matter, --sync or not --sync, doesn't matter. Also, it doesn't matter if I run sa-learn --spam or spamassassin -r first. Further, spamassassin -r and sa-learn

Re: [AMaViS-user] Directing tagged mails to a separate mbox for a domain

amavis wrote: Hi, My settings are as follows in amavisd.conf $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 3.1; $sa_kill_level_deflt = 9.0; So suppose I want the mails which have a score of equal to or greater than 3.1 and less than 9.0 to go to a separate spam box for that domain . Above 9.0 the mail

Re: [AMaViS-user] Different rule for outgoing mail

One possibility is to add a SA test which checks on a particular Received header field (like some specific internal IP address), and conditionalize the other test (using meta rules). P.S. here is another possibility: let SA know through a header field about which policy banks were loaded at

Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavisd-new and SA and Bayes

Ilo wrote: Hi Ive got two servers running amavisd-new using spamassassin both with equal MX preference, now im using bayes with mysql DB and my one box has a higher hit rate than the other , 1st = %35.6: BAYES_99=4.3 2nd = %87.7: BAYES_99=4.3 and obvisouly the server with the lower

Re: [AMaViS-user] Directing tagged mails to a separate mbox for a domain

Sysadmin, My settings are as follows in amavisd.conf $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 3.1; $sa_kill_level_deflt = 9.0; So suppose I want the mails which have a score of equal to or greater than 3.1 and less than 9.0 to go to a separate spam box for that domain . Above 9.0 the mail is discarded.

Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavisd-new and SA and Bayes

Ilo, Ive got two servers running amavisd-new using spamassassin both with equal MX preference, now im using bayes with mysql DB and my one box has a higher hit rate than the other ... Gary V wrote: you could have them both use one database (possibly on another machine) That is probably

Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavisd and spam detection - only for special domains?

Philipp, We are using amavisd to scan incoming mails for viruses. While we are manageing our imap with courier imap and virtual users, we can't use procmail ... what's the most simple way to scan all incoming mails for viruses but only mails to maildomain.de additionally for spam?

[AMaViS-user] Amavisd-new $sql_select_policy called with sender address as argument?

Hi I've been using SQL lookups on amavisd-new 2.4.2 for a couple weeks with relative success. Today I was looking at amavisd-new logfile (debuglevel 4) and I got surprised when I noticed that '$sql_select_policy' query was being performed twice for each email

Re: [AMaViS-user] [OT] amavis-stats 0.1.21 anyone?

At 13:10 05.09.2006, you wrote: I know this is OT, but I do have to ask... I've tried to get amavis-stats 0.1.21 up and running, but with no big success. I can't get it to show tabs and buttons. the rest is working? Anyone? If you feel it's too OT for the list, please respond privately. if the

Re: [AMaViS-user] [OT] amavis-stats 0.1.21 anyone?

MK [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] skrev: At 13:10 05.09.2006, you wrote: I know this is OT, but I do have to ask... I've tried to get amavis-stats 0.1.21 up and running, but with no big success. I can't get it to show tabs and buttons. the rest is working? Anyone? If you feel it's too OT for the

Re: [AMaViS-user] First public pre-release of amavisd-new-2.4.3 (-pre2)

On 05/09/06 11:39, Mark Martinec wrote: The first public pre-release of amavisd-new 2.4.3 is available at: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.3-pre2.tar.gz The use IO::Select line in the Courier patch has got misplaced again. In fact it is no longer necessary, because now

[AMaViS-user] 2 Strings in subject has to excist

Hello, Another way to beat my problem is the next. In the subject of a mail , 2 strings has to excist. Like : greetings and dear friend Greetings in the beginning Dear friend case insensitive I use a meta rule. header __OFFICE_1 Subject =~ /^greetings/ header __OFFICE_2 Subject =~ /dear

[AMaViS-user] 2 Strings in subject has to excist FolowUp

I also tried, meta SOLUTION __OFFICE_1 + __OFFICE2 and meta SOLUTION __OFFICE_1 __OFFICE2 instead of meta SOLUTION (__OFFICE_1 + __OFFICE2) Also no luck Greetings.. - Using Tomcat but need to do more?