On Wednesday January 24 2007 06:36, Gary V wrote:
[...], but at some point in the near future (when etch goes stable)
we are all going to have to move to etch in order to keep our systems
updated.
... or to some other OS or distribution that won't be giving you
such headaches ... :)
Mark
Dears,
Is it possible to add a customer tag in the subject for $banned_quarantine_to
mails?
My setup is:
$banned_quarantine_to= [EMAIL PROTECTED];
And I want to add something like ***BANNED*** to the header to keep my Inbox
clean.
Like the Subject for Spammails, this is set to:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amavis-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Martinec
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 1:57 AM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] First public pre-release (-pre2) ofamavisd-new-
2.4.5
Gary,
Leon,
Sometimes I wonder why we bother and keep writing
software and preparing patches, especially with
security-related stuff...
You're right here.
The problem is that it takes so much long for OS maintainers
to release a new ver.
For Suse for example, the latest version available is
Giampaolo,
What if I put PASS as the final destiny of banned
content? Is the banned content checked against SA *and*
defanged (in this order) before delivery?
My setup specifies defanging for banned content. So, instead of using
banned_file_lover setting, I should put D_PASS in the banned
Henrik wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:37:08AM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
On Wednesday January 24 2007 06:36, Gary V wrote:
[...], but at some point in the near future (when etch goes stable)
we are all going to have to move to etch in order to keep our systems
updated.
... or to
Hi,
I noticed there's bits of code in amavis to allow it to act as a
tcp_access map for postfix, but I'm not sure if this is complete.
I was wondering if there's any chance that this might be developed to
allow amavis to act as a policy server for postfix.
In particular, I'd like to be able
Christian,
Is it possible to add a customer tag in the subject for
$banned_quarantine_to mails?
My setup is: $banned_quarantine_to = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject header fields in quarantined messages are never modified.
Editing of Subject is only done on passed mail (and only to
local
Rafael wrote:
Hi,
I've just installed Convert::UUlib v 1.08 from CPAN without any problems
on Debian Sarge on i386.
/usr/bin/make test -- OK
What does this say?:
apt-cache policy gcc
Gary V
-
Take Surveys. Earn
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giampaolo,
What if I put PASS as the final destiny of banned
content? Is the banned content checked against SA *and*
defanged (in this order) before delivery?
My setup specifies defanging for banned content. So, instead of using
banned_file_lover setting, I
Rob,
I noticed there's bits of code in amavis to allow it to act as a
tcp_access map for postfix, but I'm not sure if this is complete.
I was wondering if there's any chance that this might be developed to
allow amavis to act as a policy server for postfix.
In particular, I'd like to be
Giampaolo,
With 2.5.0 yes.
I want it. No, I need it! :)
Ok, tomorrow or maybe even today...
Oh, by the way. Is it a per-user config, right?
Which? Enabling defanging, *_lovers, blocking_ccat and such
is per-user, but when defanging strikes it, it still currently
applies the same message
Mark Martinec wrote:
The Postfix policy protocol support is complete, but there is almost
no semantics in-there. Similarly the support for Postfix tcp lookup
maps is there. I did both mostly as a proof-of-concept, because
most of the code is common with AM.PDP protocol support and was
not
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giampaolo,
With 2.5.0 yes.
I want it. No, I need it! :)
Ok, tomorrow or maybe even today...
Great!
Oh, by the way. Is it a per-user config, right?
Which? Enabling defanging, *_lovers, blocking_ccat and such
is per-user,
I meant blocking_ccat.
but
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
A pre-release of amavisd-new-2.4.5 is available at:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.5-pre2.tar.gz
The 2.4.5 is primarily a maintenance release, fixing known
bugs and deficiencies of 2.4.4. It is expected to be the last
release
Dear Robert et al,
Robert Brooks wrote:
[..]
Mark,
many thanks for this. I'd not thought about the problems with
performance. However it is precisely because this is prequeue that I am
interested.
Me too, I'm interested to have some of the tests done pre-queue.
I'm keen to avoid
Rob,
I assume when you say there are no semantics you mean it's going to be
hard to get AM.PDP to give the answers to Postfix I am looking for?
The current code is very simple:
sub postfix_policy($$$) {
my($conn,$msginfo,$attr_ref) = @_;
my(@response);
if ($attr_ref-{'request'} ne
Vincent,
If using p0f-analyzer, please switch soon to a version of
p0f-analyzer.pl as supplied with 2.4.5-pre2 (or later).
It fixes an endless-loop in p0f-analyzer.pl which happens
if a p0f daemon crashes (piped to stdin of p0f-analyzer)
or is manually terminated without also
hi,
I intend to implement the relaydelay greylisting on a sendmail dual
configuration
with amavisd-new.
Thanks to tell me if it can run and if so where should i put the
relaydelay stuff, sendmail-rx.cf
or sendmai-tx.cf ?
regards.
jrand
myself writes:
which may pose a small risk of DoS. Such attack is only
possible from within your own networks, as a firewall or
a router should already be discarding packets with your
own network address coming from outside.
Actually I'll be adding one more obstacle, just in case:
-
Mark Martinec wrote the following on 23/01/2007 16:55:
If using p0f-analyzer, please switch soon to a version of
p0f-analyzer.pl as supplied with 2.4.5-pre2 (or later).
Mark
Could you post a download link for p0f-analyzer?
Then those who use it independently of amavisd-new (as if there would
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
myself writes:
which may pose a small risk of DoS. Such attack is only
possible from within your own networks, as a firewall or
a router should already be discarding packets with your
own network address coming from outside.
Actually I'll be adding
Alan,
Could you post a download link for p0f-analyzer?
Then those who use it independently of amavisd-new (as if there would be
any such person) or those where it is not included in an amavisd-new
package e.g. Fedora rpm's, can easily get it.
Ok, here it is:
Vincent,
You mean like:
--- p0f-analyzer.pl.orig2007-01-24 15:06:53.585900184 -0800
+++ p0f-analyzer.pl 2007-01-24 15:06:24.257358800 -0800
Yes, almost. See:
http://www.ijs.si/software/p0f-analyzer.pl
Mark
24 matches
Mail list logo
