Hi,
just wondering,
I have updated clamd on all my machines, mostly running RH9 to RHEL4 and
CentOS4, and after the update clamd does not create the socket
immediately. It seems to take up to three minutes, before it decides to
create a socket, at whatever the location. After that it is
Hello,
i am trying to set up a spam sender whitelist/blacklist, I need to be
able to retrieve the lists from a LDAP server.
I had included the amavis' LDAP schema and added the correct attributes
but amavid-new don't triggers the LDAP lookup for whitelist.
We can discard LDAP configuration
I had forgotten to report the amavisd-new version I am using.
In the changelog file is labeled as Patch: amavisd-new-20030616-p10
and the file is dated at June 29, 2004.
It is the debian oldtable package
Cheers,
Javier
El mar, 05-06-2007 a las 09:34 +0200, Javier Amor García escribió:
Hello,
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 09:34 +0200 schrieb Peter Huetmannsberger:
yes, the same here on debian etch. Seems clamd now needs very long time
to read the signature database.
marius.
I have updated clamd on all my machines, mostly running RH9 to RHEL4 and
CentOS4, and after the update clamd
Hans,
Actually, I did it both ways: amavis added to group clamav and clamav
added to group amavis.
[...]
This certainly solved the problem. I'm still wondering why it doesn't
work the other way, but I'll have another look at that later.
It seems this problem is affecting certain
Just in case, please try to become user clamav, and try accessing
(for reading) some amavis temporary files in its .../parts/ subdirectories.
P.S. does clamd complain in its log about 'initgroups' failing
or not being supported?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Marius Sturm
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 4:49 AM
To: Amavis ML
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Clamd-90.3 acting strangely
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 09:34 +0200 schrieb Peter
Huetmannsberger:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dennis A.Kanevsky
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 1:11 AM
To: Mark Martinec
Cc: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] altermime and tempdir
- Unexpected file
Hi all,
I'm planning for an upgrade of our existing RHEL3, sendmail-milter+amavis
setup handling roughly 130,000 messages/day.
I know this might be more about SA than amavis, but it's such a good list!
:) I hope it's ok..
The setup has worked very well since the initial install 2 years ago,
Martin Svensson schrieb:
Hi all,
I'm planning for an upgrade of our existing RHEL3, sendmail-milter+amavis
setup handling roughly 130,000 messages/day.
I know this might be more about SA than amavis, but it's such a good list!
:) I hope it's ok..
The setup has worked very well since
vor 3 Tagen (02.06.2007/23:58 Uhr) schrieb Jim Knuth,
I use
[? %q |Not quarantined. | The message has been quarantined
as: %q]
in template notify_virus_recips.txt.
And
$final_virus_destiny = D_DISCARD; # (defaults to D_BOUNCE)
$final_banned_destiny = D_DISCARD; # (defaults
Hallo Mark,
Op dinsdag 05 juni 2007 schreef Mark Martinec aan
amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
Actually, I did it both ways: amavis added to group clamav and
clamav added to group amavis. [...] This certainly solved the
problem. I'm still wondering why it doesn't work the other
way,
Hallo Mark,
Op dinsdag 05 juni 2007 schreef Mark Martinec aan
amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
MM P.S. does clamd complain in its log about 'initgroups'
MM failing or not being supported?
No complaints at all.
Groeten,
Hans.
jdh punt beekhuizen bij duinheks punt xs4all punt
Michael wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 09:34 +0200 schrieb Peter
Huetmannsberger:
yes, the same here on debian etch. Seems clamd now needs very
long time to read the signature database.
Same on Freebsd, 5.5
Hmm. I also run etch on P4 2.0:
Tue Jun 5 09:46:37 2007 - clamd
lists wrote:
Hallo Mark,
MM It seems this problem is affecting certain installations and is
MM reported every now and then, but is not affecting most of the
MM rest. It would be useful to locate the cause of it. It may be
MM related to the version of clamd, to the OS, and to the version
Hallo Gary,
Op dinsdag 05 juni 2007 schreef Gary V aan amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
GV Are you running AppArmor or SELinux?
No.
Groeten,
Hans.
jdh punt beekhuizen bij duinheks punt xs4all punt nl
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5/070407
* Origin: The Wizard is using MBSE/Linux
Thanks you for all your comments, at least I know now, I haven't gone
compeletly gaga.
I don't know, in fact I don't think it has anything to do with reading the
signature files. I had the log open, when it said
Tue Jun 5 09:07:09 2007 - Reading databases from /var/clamav
Tue Jun 5
The setup has worked very well since the initial install 2
years ago, we're running standard SA with DCC+Bayes+AWL etc.
Now that we're doing an overhaul I'm thinking about adding
some additional plugins and would like to hear your opinions.
Stability is our main concern, so I'm not very
Peter wrote:
Thanks you for all your comments, at least I know now, I haven't gone
compeletly gaga.
I don't know, in fact I don't think it has anything to do with reading the
signature files. I had the log open, when it said
Tue Jun 5 09:07:09 2007 - Reading databases from /var/clamav
Hello,
on a P4, it takes about 2 Minutes to restart clamd while amavis is
running and falling back to clamscan.
Maybe the double access to the signature file waste alot of time.
Marius.
Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007 - +++ Started at Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007
Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007 - clamd daemon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following on 6/5/2007
8:33 AM -0800:
Hallo Mark,
Op dinsdag 05 juni 2007 schreef Mark Martinec aan
amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
Actually, I did it both ways: amavis added to group clamav and
clamav added to group amavis. [...] This certainly solved
Marius wrote:
Hello,
on a P4, it takes about 2 Minutes to restart clamd while amavis is
running and falling back to clamscan.
Maybe the double access to the signature file waste alot of time.
Marius.
Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007 - +++ Started at Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007
Tue Jun 5 19:46:04
Martin,
- p0f. How well does it work? Is it very effective?
It is helpful, but score most not be too aggressive,
as there are some companies running their MTA on windows.
Here are my current rules:
header L_P0F_WXP X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint =~ /^Windows XP(?![^(]*\b2000 SP)/
score L_P0F_WXP
Mark Martinec schrieb:
Use both.
(but not pyzor)
Hmm, why not?
It's not updated anymore, right?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
===
AMaViS Security Announcement
Date: 2007-06-05
affected version(s):amavis, amavisd, amavisd-new
Vulnerability: file
(but not pyzor)
Hmm, why not?
It's not updated anymore, right?
I haven't checked the valuability of its score points it brings recently,
but compared to dcc and razor, the pyzor is the most CPU-intensive.
Mark
-
This
26 matches
Mail list logo
