Re: [AMaViS-user] rw_loop: leaving rw loop, no progress

2009-03-20 Thread Gary V
> smtp inet n - n - 5 smtpd > > smtp-amavis unix - - n - 5 smtp > -o smtp_data_done_timeout=1200 > -o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes > -o disable_dns_lookups=yes > -o max_use=20 > > 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n

Re: [AMaViS-user] pen pal feature: LOCAL or not LOCAL

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Thomas, > i'm trying to activate the pen pals / bounce killer feature. P.S., with amavisd-new-2.6.2 please apply the patch: http://marc.info/?l=amavis-user&m=123249133113408 when implementing SQL logging / pen pals, otherwise referencing by Message-ID gives incorrect results. (unless a packa

Re: [AMaViS-user] not seeing stars in

2009-03-20 Thread Gary V
On 3/20/09, Goodman, William wrote: > Hi all, > > Has any body have the configuration setting to show the stars in the > "X-Spam-Level:", is the setting in spamassassin > or postfix. I running postfix, ClamAV and Spamassassin  all current > versions. see snippet below: > > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd

[AMaViS-user] not seeing stars in

2009-03-20 Thread Goodman, William
Hi all, Has any body have the configuration setting to show the stars in the "X-Spam-Level:", is the setting in spamassassin or postfix. I running postfix, ClamAV and Spamassassin all current versions. see snippet below: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jcvi.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Carlos, > how do I reject messages that have a high score of something like '5'? > X-Spam-Score: 11.543 > $sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31; > $final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE; Yes, that should suffice. To block a message, $final_spam_destiny must not be D_PASS, score must be above kill level, and recip

Re: [AMaViS-user] pen pal feature: LOCAL or not LOCAL

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Thomas, > i'm trying to activate the pen pals / bounce killer feature. > > i'm using amavisd-new 2.6.2 on debian lenny. i configured storage_sql_dsn > for logging. lookup is done in ldap. Full configuration here: > http://pastebin.com/m45149835 > > i've configured a policybank SMTP and Submission.

[AMaViS-user] pen pal feature: LOCAL or not LOCAL

2009-03-20 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi i'm trying to activate the pen pals / bounce killer feature. i'm using amavisd-new 2.6.2 on debian lenny. i configured storage_sql_dsn for logging. lookup is done in ldap. Full configuration here: http://pastebin.com/m45149835 i've configured a policybank SMTP and Submission. Postfix will

Re: [AMaViS-user] rw_loop: leaving rw loop, no progress

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Ivan, > This is log in attached files Thanks, interesting and strange. I'll CC this to the Postfix mailing list, in case someone can provide an explanation. > I have problem with amavisd-new. > My system: FreeBSD 5.4, postfix-2.3.14, amavisd-new-2.6.2_2, > p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5 > > For eac

Re: [AMaViS-user] rw_loop: leaving rw loop, no progress

2009-03-20 Thread Doskochynskyi Ivan
Hello Mark, >>> For insight into what is happening, a tcpdump of the failing session would >>> be interesting (tcpdump -i lo0 -s 0 -w c.log 'tcp port 10025'), and/or >>> a log at level 5, especially all the 'rw_loop' log entries and a few >>> events before that, along with timestamps. > Seeing th

Re: [AMaViS-user] spamassassin AWL or penpals

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Stan, > What is better : AWL in spamassassin or penpals in amavis or both? > What is your opininion? These are quite different mechanisms, it's hard to compare their merits. AWL is just an averaging mechanism, penpals can rescue a mail (a reply) in an ongoing conversation. Besides, the SQL log da

Re: [AMaViS-user] AMBOOST, autolearn ham, shortcircuit rule

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Michael, > wondering if the AMBOOST value is used when deciding if SA will > autolearn as ham: > > x-Spam-Score: -100.484 > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 > tests=[AM:BOOST=-97.611, AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, > DCC_REPUT_13_19=-0.5, HTML

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Alexander Wirt
Carlos Williams schrieb am Friday, den 20. March 2009: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Scheidell > wrote: > > Final destination set for pass? > > This does not make sense to me. Can you be more specific? Am I missing > this parameter in the config file I am looking at? Does that go >

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Carlos Williams
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > See 20-debian_defaults > > > $final_virus_destiny      = D_DISCARD;  # (data not lost, see virus > quarantine) > $final_banned_destiny     = D_BOUNCE;   # D_REJECT when front-end MTA > $final_spam_destiny       = D_BOUNCE; > $final_bad_heade

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Carlos Williams
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Final destination set for pass? This does not make sense to me. Can you be more specific? Am I missing this parameter in the config file I am looking at? Does that go somewhere else in the /etc/amavis/conf.d file? --

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Michael Scheidell
> > > $sa_spam_subject_tag = '***SPAM*** '; > $sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0; # add spam info headers if at, or above that > level > $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.31; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level > $sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31; # triggers spam evasive actions > $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 10; #

[AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Carlos Williams
I have Amavisd-new installed and configured however I am trying to understand how it works. It appears to be scoring my incoming messages like SpamAssassin would however it appears I have SA installed but not running: This is fine however when I get a message, I do see in the headers that someone