level ($sa_tag_level_deflt or a lookups
> list @spam_tag_level_maps) or tag level is undefined;
> - recipient must be considered local (matching @local_domains_maps);
Would this domain map be the same as relay_domains
s? Is this because of a debugging level, or
is there something misconfigured or not working properly?
Thanks,
Alex
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer
Hello, first time posting. I inherited a CentOS 4.x box running
amavisd-new (from rpmforge version 2.64) and spamassassin and postfix.
I'm new to amavisd but have been trying to read up on config and
searching the archive for some enlightenment and haven't found what I
need.
I have some mail that
Hi,
Is there any way to hack into amavis to save all incomming/outgoing mail
subject?
I want to save message_id and the subject.
Thanks
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the fi
mAssassin::BayesStore::SQL as a bayes_store_module).
Can you recommend a guide to do the migration from bdb to mysql and
associated programs (innodb?), and be able to keep the system running
at the same time? (o
g an older version of amavisd-new now, but am currently in the
process of upgrading. In the interim, I'd like to make some
performance improvements to ease the load until I can upgrade
/bypassing.html
bunt can't figure out how to resolve my problem
If someone have a good example for how to resolve this problem please
advice
Thank you
Alex
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new sof
ain users from being
processed by amavisd-new?
Ideally, I'd like it to bypass IP addresses, as per those
authenticated in the pop-before-smtp database. Otherwise, how does one
know for sure that u...@mydomain.com is really that user and not a
spoof?
Thanks,
Alex
---
Can this somehow be used?
The @bypass_*checks is for the recipient, not the sender, correct? So
that doesn't even have anything to do with what I'm trying to do,
correct?
Thanks again,
Alex
--
This SF.Net em
spam_checks_acl = qw( mail.corpAdomain.com .mail.corpAdomain.com );
@local_domains_acl = ( "." ); # all domains
What could I be missing? Please let me know if any further information
is necessary to help troubleshoot this.
Thanks,
Alex
-
On 6/8/07, Dave McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2007, at 1:05 PM, alex handle wrote:
> >> I've had some serious crashes with InnoDB lately, which forced me to
> >> completely delete the amavis-new DB and restart fresh.
> >>
> >> So,
On 6/8/07, Anders Norrbring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had some serious crashes with InnoDB lately, which forced me to
> completely delete the amavis-new DB and restart fresh.
>
> So, what are the pros/cons on using ISAM vs InnoDB for the Amavis-new DB?
>
i use myisam for read-itensive appl
On 3/31/07, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gary,
>
> > > Here are some good reasons to continue checking outgoing mail:
> >
> > All good points and in fact I personally do not bypass spam scanning
> > in my MYNETS policy bank. There is one thing I have always questioned
> > about zomb
On 3/30/07, Robert Felber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in statistics from other users of mails on a per client
> basis
> which got filtered out more than one time.
>
> I want to evaluate whether it is worth the work to implement a policy
> notifier which is able to to se
On 3/29/07, Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * alex handle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/29/07, Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > * alex handle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Hi!
> &
On 3/29/07, Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * alex handle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Does someone have experience with running amavisd-new as
> > before-queue-filter?
>
> I tried it once, but it was too slow and couldn&#x
On 3/29/07, Christian Rost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> alex handle schrieb:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Does someone have experience with running amavisd-new as
> > before-queue-filter?
> > I want to reject spam at the smtp level, because it is far more
> transp
on a two-node
cluster.
Are there any performance considerations?
My system allready rejects 60 - 75 % with smtp_recipient_restrictions,
policyd-weight and DNSBLs.
Thx!
Alex
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of
On 3/27/07, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> alex,
>
> > > Vulnerability: file utility
> > > Priority: urgent
> > > Solution: update to file 4.20 or later
>
> > Is FreeBSD affected or is the BSD fi
__
> AMaViS-user mailing list
> AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
> AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
> AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
>
Is FreeBSD affected or is the BSD file
> AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
>
Hi,
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavisd-settings.html
search for D_PASS.
Alex
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's T
MAVIS: Error while unpacking
0004 as application/x-zip
Nov 14 18:06:36 mail amavis[8077]: AMAVIS: Giving up
Nov 14 18:06:36 mail amavis[8077]: AMAVIS: Error while unpacking message
How can I know what caused the problem?. Also, can I tell it not to
freeze the message and deliver it anyway?
22 matches
Mail list logo
