Sorry guys,
after several hours staring at the problem, I just found the problem:
>> --8BFB1D6001F9748054F2C3412980690B
>> Just a simple test e-mail.
>>
>> --8BFB1D6001F9748054F2C3412980690B
Due to the empty line at the end, the original text is interpreted as email
header and in thi
Hi all,
my amavis installation detects a bad header in S/MIME signed emails if the text
part has no Content-Type header.
I'm getting this message in my dsn:
> The message WAS NOT relayed to:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>554 5.6.0 Reject, id=06568-01 - BAD_HEADER: MIME error: error: couldn't
>
Hi,
wpc schrieb:
> Thanks for your reply, could you kindly send me this patch i'll be
> gratefull.
Some old versions of my patches (against 2.4.0pre??) can be found in
http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/opensource/amavisd-new/
Please not that I do recommend using them on a production system yet
wpc schrieb:
> i would like a test setup of the dspam filter on my production server that
> only sends mail through dspam from some particular users participating in the
> testing exercise while the rest of the users remain on the current setup with
> SA.
I think that is not possible with the curr
Eric Yellin schrieb:
> Almost 2 minutes between entries...
> DSPAM is taking way too long to process.
> How can I find out what exactly is causing this slowness?
Which version of DSPAM do you use? Which database backend? (if MySQL: which
engine?) Do you execute some maintainance operations on th
Thomas Lau schrieb:
> do you have a retrain script which could allow dspam train with the
> message even the signature isn't on the message body ?
I thought that dspam would recognize a signature in the message header. If not,
you
probably should ask at the dspam mailing list.
Unfortunately, m
Thomas Lau schrieb:
> hey all, I am using dspam + amavis, but I realize that no matter what I
> do to config signature location, it still appear on the email header but
> not the email message itself, anyone know how to resolve this ? Thanks.
The SA+DSPAM integration in amavisd-new has some weakne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> does anyone using amavis + dspam ?
> I am wondering if it's possible to use individual spam filtering rather than
> goes into amavis default account ? Thanks
I have some patches to make dspam a first class citizen in amavisd-new (posted
to the ml
in Jan/Feb 06). The
Henrik Krohns wrote:
> Any system that requires feedback from the users is flaved IMO. I'm sure
> our workers have better things to do than train bayes. We just use a global
> autolearning database, and in our case it works even better as we don't
> communicate in english.
IMHO this is a weak arg
Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote:
> My only (small) gripe against dspam is that it insists on delivering
> one message to each receiver separately (via LMTP) instead of handing
> it over to the next filter step "as is".
It depends on the parameters used to call DSPAM. If you are using --stdout,
DSPAM w
Hi,
System User schrieb:
> for amavis find dspam only is necesary which dpam has permision
> r-x--s--- but, amabis not found dspam, for amavis can find dspam I set
> permision to r-xr-xr-x
> Isn't necesary read permision for execute stat for a file, why not found
> dspam?
Can you rephrase your q
Lucio Chiappetti schrieb:
> This is a shorter request for clarification (see previous longer post for
> details) about our attempt to replace our pure sendmail with DNSBL
> filtering policy with one based on sendmail 8.13.1, amavisd-new-2.1.2 in
> the "milter" configuration and spamassassin (sp
Hi Torbjorn,
Torbjorn Soderberg wrote:
> So, when a email has reached tag2 level and the subject is rewrite
> (according to my config) I also would like to add a header or footer
> with a link to a FAQ document that describes the spam situation on the
> internet.
When I read your subject line,
Hi all,
I just wanted to let you know that I have a working prototype for a
new spamscanner for amavisd-new called Amavis::SpamControl::DSPAM.
Main features:
- Chooses the DSPAM user based on the recipients (but can be
configured to use the same user all the time).
- Adds a DSPAM signature to t
Ilja Marchew wrote:
> hmm, it's strange. SA check gets all the time, but spamd process doesn't.
(...)
>> What is spamd used for?
> it's spamassassin daemon.
amavisd-new does not use spamd. It integrates SpamAssassin as a
"library". There is no point in using spamd when using amavisd-new at
the
Hi,
D.Krueger schrieb:
> the following error occurs when I try to send a mail.
> amavis[28515]: (28515-02)(!!) TROUBLE in check_mail: mime_decode-1
> FAILED: MIME::Parser: can't open tmpfile: Invalid argument
> amavis[28515]: (28515-02)(!) PRESERVING EVIDENCE in
> /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20060421T
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I have a problem while writing my dspam plugin for amavis.
>>
>> In order to check the current mail I do the following:
>> my($dspam_arguments) = '--mode=toe --user amavis
>> --deliver=spam,innocent --process --stdout ';
>> my($proc_fh,$pid) = run_command('&'.
Hi all,
I have a problem while writing my dspam plugin for amavis.
In order to check the current mail I do the following:
my($dspam_arguments) = '--mode=toe --user amavis --deliver=spam,innocent
--process --stdout ';
my($proc_fh,$pid) = run_command('&'.$fh->fileno, "&1", $self->{'dspam'},
$
Oliver,
Oliver Geisen wrote:
> is there a graphical scheme available for amavisd ? One which shows
> the internal structure (flow) and it's interacting components. Or
> can anyone explain the internal modular structure so i can draw one
> myself ? I find amavisd's internals are poorly documented,
Henrik Krohns wrote:
>> Second, upgrading is easier (yum update) if the packager did his/her
>> job well. And since most packagers know the software much better than
>> I do (which is the case for 99,9% of all programs), they will prevent
>> me from doing anything bad.
> Thats a bit of a stretch
Henrik Krohns wrote:
> Maybe this is a bit offtopic, but why does everyone insist on using RPM/DEB
> whatever packages for everything?
> In my humble opinion, amavisd-new/spamassassin is much easier to handle when
> you compile own perl instance to /usr/local/perl. You can update it or your
> sys
Hi Dustin,
Dustin Humm wrote:
> We protect roughly 25 domains with postfix/amavis/spamassassin. All of
> these domains need to be able to talk to one another. Although we are
> using this system for incoming mail only, we, obviously, need to allow
> communication between the domains that we prote
Hi Richard,
Richard Bishop schrieb:
> Has anybody else considered such a system? Any advice on how to go
> about implementing it? Any general comments?
I think you are hit by some of the disadvantages of SpamAssassin (many
rules to maintain, most of the times it is not easy adding user
specific r
What is considered the best way to introduce a configuration value? I
read about maps and policy banks but did not find a real solution what
to do...
I want to add a per-user setting for the spam filter to use. I thought
about using something like
> @spam_filter_maps = ({ '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' => '
BJ Dierkes schrieb:
> Felix Schwarz wrote:
>>That depends on what filter you are using. SpamAssassin's bayes db
>>itself can be used by different users. amavisd-new does currently only
>>use one user. If you want to be able to report spam by your webmailer
>>yo
Hallo Jakob,
Jakob Curdes schrieb:
> I figured out a way to train dspam via mail forwarding but got stuck
> in the user jungle - dspam wants to train the mail as user "nobody"
> and dies because it cannot create the lock files for this user.
Try the command line option '--user="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi BJ,
BJ Dierkes schrieb:
> I am using Horde Webmail. I have configured it so that when you
> click "report as spam" it runs sa-learn against the email. Now, this
> is being run as www-data (debian) I assume and therefore my question
> is this: Are the statistics processed into a global database
Hi Chris,
Covington, Chris wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:46:16AM +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> FOREWORD:
>> After using MailScanner for about three years, I finally switched to
>> amavisd-new because I liked some things in the implementat
Hi Mark,
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Well, the story goes like this: the semantics of the name
> sa_mail_body_size_limit is correct as intended. Its primay function
> is to compare it with $msginfo->orig_body_size.
> Then Ralf came up with an example of a mail which had a huuuge
> header and a normal
Hi Brian,
Brian May wrote:
> Felix Schwarz wrote:
>> FOREWORD:
>> After using MailScanner for about three years, I finally switched to
>> amavisd-new because I liked some things in the implementation better.
>> One thing I really need is a "decent" DSPAM
Hi all.
FOREWORD:
After using MailScanner for about three years, I finally switched to
amavisd-new because I liked some things in the implementation better.
One thing I really need is a "decent" DSPAM integration. I do not
consider the current DSPAM integration in amavisd-new as sufficient as
it i
Hi all,
while working on a spam scanner plugin interface for amavisd-new, I
noticed some minor things which IMHO should be improved. All patches
are available at http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/opensource/
because I don't know your attachement policy.
01_mbxname.patch: When calculating the pa
32 matches
Mail list logo
