Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-21 Thread Mark Martinec
Ian, > > Yes, by-recipients setting is available: > > @bypass_header_checks_maps = ( list of lookup tables as usual ); > > So the lookup table is simply regex matched? If you use a regexp-type of a lookup table, then yes. All types of availabe lookups are explainded in README.lookups . > I.E. I

Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-20 Thread Ian
>> If I wanted to whitlist a particular domain, is >> there a check_maps I could use to do that instead? > > Yes, by-recipients setting is available: > > @bypass_header_checks_maps = ( list of lookup tables as usual ); So the lookup table is simply regex matched? I.E. I could even do something

Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Ian, > > Do not be misled by the fact that default setting is also > > to quarantine a mail with a bad header (i.e. a copy goes > > to a guarantine, but mail is passed to recipients nevertheless). > > To avoid quarantining mail with bad headers, it must be turned off > > explicitly, as shown above

Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-20 Thread Ian
> The default setting is $final_bad_header_destiny=D_PASS . > If you see mail being blocked by header checks, it must be > because you have explicitly overridden the default in > your amavisd.conf. Ah, I must have then. Okay, I'm beginning to see the flow of things now. Very IPTABLES like. > D

Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Ian, > > @bypass_header_checks_maps = ( 1 ); > > Thanks again... I see now in the comments that the same method can be used > to disable spam and virii checks. > > >> I get way too many false positives from this! > > > > False positives in what sense? That a test said a header is bad > > but is re

Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Ian, > Currently, we've got a special user "archiver" that gets all emails are > BCC'ed to. I've been trying to figure out how to get amavisd to simply > send all emails through to this user without exception, even if it > contains spam, bad headers, virii, etc... > So far I've got these rules: >

Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-20 Thread Ian
> Please post your full amavisd.conf file with the comments pulled out. Steven, Thanks for looking into this. I've replaced our real domain with "mydomain" but the text is otherwise identical. - This SF.net email is spons

Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-20 Thread Steven Whaley
Please post your full amavisd.conf file with the comments pulled out. Ian wrote: >> You don't need the => 1 in your entry. That syntax is for creating >> policy banks, where you assign values to a perl array. Normal rules >> just take the values as a list. >> >> @bypass_virus_checks_maps = ( "[

Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-20 Thread Ian
> You don't need the => 1 in your entry. That syntax is for creating > policy banks, where you assign values to a perl array. Normal rules > just take the values as a list. > > @bypass_virus_checks_maps = ( "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"); > > That syntax for all of your entries should work. > > Ian wrote:

Re: [AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-19 Thread Steven Whaley
You don't need the => 1 in your entry. That syntax is for creating policy banks, where you assign values to a perl array. Normal rules just take the values as a list. @bypass_virus_checks_maps = ( "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"); That syntax for all of your entries should work. Ian wrote: > I'm having

[AMaViS-user] sql quarantine ignoring amavisd settings?

2007-09-19 Thread Ian
I'm having a hell of a time tuning our quarantine and thought I'd finally actually ask the peeps here to give me the nugget of information that I'm currently lacking. (Even if it's just the nouns I need to use to search this mailing list history for the answer) Currently, we've got a special user