I thought that they had already made a statement on this
and withdrawn it a while back, and still tried to maintain that
they were right even though they didn't get their way!
If that IS what they said then it would seem to be an
incredibly arrogant attitude after such a silly mistake.
> This i
This info crossed the qrp-l group last night. I thought it would be of
interest here as well.
The ARRL has rescinded its petition for rule making to the FCC
requesting regulation by bandwidth rather than mode:
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/04/27/101/?nc=1 >
The subject will be reconsid
Of course, and I could substitute this word for that word and that word
for this word, etc. Maybe the FCC also reads between the lines.
Pete, wa2cwa
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:03:53 -0800 (PST) VJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pete, look gently on Stephen's comment.
> Substitute the word bandspace for
Pete, look gently on Stephen's comment.
Substitute the word bandspace for bandwidth below and
it all makes sense.
Paul/VJB
> More importantly, I respectfully request that FCC
> provide Amplitude
> Modulation transmission by Amateur Radio stations
> with MORE BANDWIDTH...and
> ...specifically ba
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff/W5OMR
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 9:29 PM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Bandwidth
> By the Way, just how many DB down from 1500 Watts do they want
> the unwanted sideband energy?
30 to 60db down from the fundamental. At least what
> By the Way, just how many DB down from 1500 Watts do they want
> the unwanted sideband energy?
30 to 60db down from the fundamental. At least what's what the spurs have
to be reduced by. I just read that in the RFI section on the Awful Racket
Raising
League's website. (www.arrl.net)
> There
By the Way, just how many DB down from 1500 Watts do they want
the unwanted sideband energy? There is no such thing as "no energy" in
any spectrum! I remember when Otis K5SWK was tuning an antenna using a
grid dip meter and accidentally left it on. It caused complaints later
in the night
The following information appeared on the AM Window Bulletin Board. Tnx
Phil, K2PG.
The FCC has assigned an RM number, RM-10740, to the petition that seeks to
ban high-fidelity SSB, and
to cripple AM below 28 MHz with a 5.6 kHz bandwidth limit. Comments may be
filed through the ECFS page on t
Not only AM, but the recent interest in "hi-fi" SSB could be affected by
bandwidth limitations. I understand there is quite a bit of controversy pro
and con, and on 20m there has been some of the same kind of squabbling and
jamming that takes place near the AM operating frequencies.
Don K4KYV
3 KHz bandwidth for all amateur transmissions? Well, they're going
to hear from the packet, ATV, FM and satellite amateurs if they try
to pull this stunt. This had better be electromagnetic legend. I
hope they know what they would be getting into here.
But it seems to me that we've heard about th
That's fine just as long as we all remember it was K1MAN that screwed the
1KW plate input rule... Want to join AARA???
Give credit where credit is due...
Maybe this time he'll do away with amateur radio altogether... Remember,
big business wants our spectrum... isn't that what k1man said?
73
ka1
Mike Cowart wrote:
> Gentlemen:
>
> Before lambasting Bob and Riley, should we not verify the story? I sent some
> email to Bob asking him if what was being passed around is true. He flatly
> denied it and was dismayed when he saw it. There is no plan to limit BW.
> There is, however, some concer
Very true. I had tried to post the information, a week ago, but I used
the wrong e-mail address to do it with, and consequently it came back
to me, like an Australian boomerang :-)
I can not go into detail on my source, but it has in the past been quite
reliable.
73 = Best Regards,
-=Jeff/W5OMR
Thanks Mike I think your words are spoken with wisdom and fairness!
Let's get more information before we get too heated on this one...
Brian
W5AMI
- Original Message -
From: Mike Cowart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: RE: [AMRadio
t: Re: [AMRadio] Bandwidth
In a message dated 7/15/02 10:30:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>
Hi Jeff,
Between you and me and the lamp post, I think Bob Heil is making lots of
money on something I, as a broadcast engineer, have known about a
In a message dated 7/15/02 10:30:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>
Hi Jeff,
Between you and me and the lamp post, I think Bob Heil is making lots of
money on something I, as a broadcast engineer, have known about and used for
years, possibly befo
I got this out of discussion not too long ago (few weeks...)
==
Another thought occurred. wow! While visiting with Bob Heil (the microphone guy)
he mentioned that Riley Hollingsworth is working on a bandwidth plan for ham
radio si
17 matches
Mail list logo
