Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2006-02-08 Thread Donald Chester
From: Mike Dorworth,K4XM [EMAIL PROTECTED] The total power pulled from power supply determines effeciency. A low level and linear consumes less power for same carrier power. See some KW mobile rigs from years ago. also I remember WCKY had 500,000 watts modulated carrier ( 2 megawatts pep)

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-13 Thread Gary Schafer
Donald Chester wrote: Gary K4FMX said: The best quality audio of all can be gotten from low level modulation and a linear amplifier. A linear amplifier has the same kind of distortion as a class-B modulator. That's true except with a linear amp most of the distortion products fall

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Gary Schafer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a junker HW-100 with a good PA section. How much power could I run as a linear amp using 2X6146 and what rating power supply would I need? Thanks. Ed K6UUZ 25 watts carrier with 100 watts pep output on the 6146's. 73 Gary K4FMX

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread zuu6k
Thanks, Gary. Ed K6UUZ On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:58:26 -0400 Gary Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a junker HW-100 with a good PA section. How much power could I run as a linear amp using 2X6146 and what rating power supply would I need? Thanks.

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Geoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, Gary. Ed K6UUZ On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:58:26 -0400 Gary Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: because of the class of service. read here (http://www.qsl.net/wa5bxo/asyam/aam3.html) for a good explanation of everything related. 73 = Best Regards,

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Rev. Don Sanders
, DON W4BWS - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 8:32 PM Subject: [AMRadio] power ratings I want to thank everyone who responded to my question. The consensus of opinion is that the AL-811 runs 100 watts of carrier on AM

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Rev. Don Sanders
do not cathode modulate well. Healthfully yours, DON W4BWS - Original Message - From: Byron Lichtenwalner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 8:54 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] power ratings Ed Shows you

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Geoff
Rev. Don Sanders wrote: Ye3s but the cost of a good modulation transformer for 300 watts or more would be as much as a SB200. Actually for a good rig you could run a pair of 813 or a high power triode similar tube at about 800 watts and cathode modulate at 400 watts. This is cost effective and

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Donald Chester
The plate dissipation of the 6146's is the key. Your carrier steady on should not exceed the dissipation rating. This is about 50 watts if I remember right which would give you 200 watts PEP. So your power suppl;y should be capable of about 150 watts continuous and it will handle the 200 watts

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Geoff
Donald Chester wrote: The plate dissipation of the 6146's is the key. Your carrier steady on should not exceed the dissipation rating. This is about 50 watts if I remember right which would give you 200 watts PEP. So your power suppl;y should be capable of about 150 watts continuous and it

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Rev. Don Sanders
@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:39 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] power ratings I've been using linear amps in AM service for a few year now. With current band conditions, it seems to me that a goal should be at least 300 watts of carrier. Sure you can make contacts with 25-50 watts

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Geoff
Rev. Don Sanders wrote: Ken, as I read the rules, we are only allowed to run 375 watts carrier. this is wrong. There is -no- maximum carrier limit. The only maximum power limit imposed on Ham Radio operators is 1,500W PEP output, regardless of mode. 1,500W PEP output on AM, -would- be

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Geoff
In fact, since many people refuse (or just don't know how) to click on a link, allow me to paste some of that here, that is germane to the overall discussion of power levels, ratings, and class of operation of a tube. -Geoff/W5OMR =

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread kenw2dtc
Ken, as I read the rules, we are only allowed to run 375 watts carrier. With 100% modulation this will give us 1500 watts pep which is the max output allowed. ***Don, You are correct about the 1500 watts PEP. It could also be derived by 600 watts of carrier with much less than 100%

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Bob Macklin
Seattle, Wa. REAL RADIOS GLOW IN THE DARK - Original Message - From: kenw2dtc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 5:30 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] power ratings Ken, as I read the rules, we are only allowed to run 375 watts carrier

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Gary Schafer
, July 12, 2005 5:30 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] power ratings Ken, as I read the rules, we are only allowed to run 375 watts carrier. With 100% modulation this will give us 1500 watts pep which is the max output allowed. ***Don, You are correct about the 1500 watts PEP. It could also

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Geoff
Gary Schafer wrote: The best quality audio of all can be gotten from low level modulation and a linear amplifier. 73 Gary K4FMX However, highly non-efficient. --- 73 = Best Regards, -Geoff/W5OMR

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread kenw2dtc
But if you want broadcast quality audio you need a real plate modulated rig The best quality audio of all can be gotten from low level modulation and a linear amplifier. ***I disagree with both statements above. If properly set up and fixed with the proper audio chain, a plate

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Mike Dorworth,K4XM
However, highly non-efficient. Actually not TRUE. The total power pulled from power supply determines effeciency. A low level and linear consumes less power for same carrier power. See some KW mobile rigs from years ago. also I remember WCKY had 50 watts modulated carrier ( 2 megawatts

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Gary Schafer
kenw2dtc wrote: But if you want broadcast quality audio you need a real plate modulated rig The best quality audio of all can be gotten from low level modulation and a linear amplifier. ***I disagree with both statements above. If properly set up and fixed with the proper audio

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Gary Schafer
Geoff wrote: Gary Schafer wrote: The best quality audio of all can be gotten from low level modulation and a linear amplifier. 73 Gary K4FMX However, highly non-efficient. --- 73 = Best Regards, -Geoff/W5OMR Efficiency doesn't matter anymore for hams. Output power is the

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread Geoff
Gary Schafer wrote: Geoff wrote: Gary Schafer wrote: The best quality audio of all can be gotten from low level modulation and a linear amplifier. However, highly non-efficient. Efficiency doesn't matter anymore for hams. Output power is the limiting factor not input power. I

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-12 Thread W7QHO
Didn't this subject get beat to death back in January of this year? Dennis D. W7QHO Glendale, CA

[AMRadio] Power ratings

2005-07-11 Thread zuu6k
I thought I understood these things, But I have confused me little self. I need some clear thinking here. I have a rice box rated for 100 watts SSB or 25 Watts AM. I belie

Re: [AMRadio] Power ratings

2005-07-11 Thread zuu6k
Sorry about this. I must have hit a wrong key and sent the message before I was done. Ed K6UUZ On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:42:39 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I thought I understood these things, But I have confused me little self. I need some clear thinking here. I have a rice box rated for

[AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-11 Thread zuu6k
I thought I understood these things, But I have confused me little self. I need some clear thinking here. I have a rice box rated for 100 watts SSB or 25 Watts AM. I believe the 100 watts is PEP while the 25 watts is RMS (continuous carrier). I want to add a linear amplifier to bring the 25 watts

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-11 Thread Mike Dorworth,K4XM
@mailman.qth.net Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 11:54 AM Subject: [AMRadio] power ratings I thought I understood these things, But I have confused me little self. I need some clear thinking here. I have a rice box rated for 100 watts SSB or 25 Watts AM. I believe the 100 watts is PEP while the 25

RE: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-11 Thread Brett gazdzinski
] Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 11:55 AM To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: [AMRadio] power ratings I thought I understood these things, But I have confused me little self. I need some clear thinking here. I have a rice box rated for 100 watts SSB or 25 Watts AM. I believe the 100 watts is PEP while

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-11 Thread Geoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought I understood these things, But I have confused me little self. I need some clear thinking here. I have a rice box rated for 100 watts SSB or 25 Watts AM. I believe the 100 watts is PEP while the 25 watts is RMS (continuous carrier). I want to add a linear

Re: [AMRadio] Power ratings

2005-07-11 Thread k0ng
Your statement sounds pretty close to me. For instance, I set my TS-430S carrier level for about 1/3 of full carrier (Ip)capability, then adjust the mic gain control until it sounds OK on my monitor or to a live contact. Do not use a compressor at all. IMHO. Good luck. 73 K0NG . Quoting

[AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-11 Thread zuu6k
I want to thank everyone who responded to my question. The consensus of opinion is that the AL-811 runs 100 watts of carrier on AM with 400 watts PEP. This with 3X811 while my DX-100 does the same thing with 2X6146. Doesn't sound right, does it? I have a junker HW-100 with a good PA section. How

Re: [AMRadio] power ratings

2005-07-11 Thread Byron Lichtenwalner
Ed Shows you what high level modulation can do, with finals running in Class C vs. the amp running in linear mode. Byron, W3WKR