Re: [AMRadio] Test ONLY Please ignore.

2009-04-07 Thread doxemf
Could I have Two over easy with a side of bacon and a cold 807 please. -Original Message- From: WA5AM Test server... __ __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRa

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-08 Thread Ken
>>Has 160 been in very good shape lately, or is it the antenna? I was on 160 the other morning at 3AM (yes 3 AM !) with K4KYV and WA3JBT. Both local and distant stations were very strong and the noise was low. 73, Ken W2DTC __ Our Mai

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-08 Thread sbjohnston
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:20 pm Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST I have recently built a K2, and have been jumping around the bands, then I got an Alpha Delta dx-lb-plus, which does 160 to 10 meters, you can tune it to have a low swr on all the bands, its narrow on 160 and 80, but it works w

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-08 Thread George Brand
I keep thinking a series of coax parties might help get a message accross...worked fine in the sixties... George WA8SCO >It's not new. > Jim/W5JO > > __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives:

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-08 Thread Phil LaMarche
h.net [mailto:amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Joe Crawford Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 9:43 PM To: Brett Gazdzinski; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST Take out the "ex" before cb and kkk and you will be right on the money for the slopbuck

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-08 Thread Bernie Doran
OH BOY: no not a new freq, fat fingers, try 3640. Bernie - Original Message - From: "Peter A Markavage" To: Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 11:09 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST > New amateur frequency (6540)?? > > Pete, wa2cwa > > On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
I have recently built a K2, and have been jumping around the bands, then I got an Alpha Delta dx-lb-plus, which does 160 to 10 meters, you can tune it to have a low swr on all the bands, its narrow on 160 and 80, but it works well otherwise, I can hear many signals on 160, some are very strong,

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Peter A Markavage
New amateur frequency (6540)?? Pete, wa2cwa On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:49:23 -0500 "Bernie Doran" writes: Just signed with W1VZR, he was at 6540. 73 Bernie W8RPW __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Bernie Doran
ary 07, 2009 9:29 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST >I am getting really bothered by the people I hear on ssb on 80 meters at > night. > I never heard so much intolerance, they hate contests, they hate AM, they > hate blacks, they hate the government, they seem to hate everything, a

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread J.D. MacAulay, WQ8U
Bob, It's not just to hamfests. Folks coming to our church look like they are going or have been gardening or going to the beach. Respect is gone! 73 Mac WQ8U Hillsborough, NC --- On Sat, 2/7/09, Bob Peters wrote: > From: Bob Peters > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST > To: &quo

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Barrie Smith
50TL rig back in the middle 1990s. This problem is not new, nor is it restricted to a particular region. We can fight it. We can win a battle, but we cannot win the war. There are too many of them! 73, Barrie, W7ALW, Since 1950 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST > Brett, it isn't just fro

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Bob Peters
x27;s, Bob W1PE Mesquite,TX http://www.w1pe.com -Original Message- From: amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brett Gazdzinski Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 8:30 PM To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service Subject: Re: [AM

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Jim Wilhite
Brett, it isn't just from the South. That is a myth that needs to be buried. Jim/W5JO - Original Message - >I am getting really bothered by the people I hear on ssb on 80 >meters at > night. > I never heard so much intolerance, they hate contests, they hate > AM, they > hate blac

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Kim Elmore
That's a big reason why I do almost exclusively CW. AM will wait until I get my Dad's (W5JHJ SK) Globe Champ 350 going here at my shack. Thankfully, CW seems to be beyond the extremely limited mental abilities of the tertiary syphilitic cretins that hang out on the 75 m "hate" SSB frequencies.

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Joe Crawford
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 8:29 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST >I am getting really bothered by the people I hear on ssb on 80 meters at > night. > I never heard so much intolerance, they hate contests, they hat

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
I am getting really bothered by the people I hear on ssb on 80 meters at night. I never heard so much intolerance, they hate contests, they hate AM, they hate blacks, they hate the government, they seem to hate everything, and go on about it at length. Daytime on 80 meters, normal people seem to

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread Ed Sieb
Don, I was around in the mid-sixties and was a witness to all the jamming and miscreant actions against AM. I well remember the AM-SSB wars that took place on 75M! I particularly recall K4BTQ and his vulgar outbursts against SSB. This guy was a racist and an antisemite, so you can imagine th

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-07 Thread D. Chester
> ...I'd be willing to venture that over 80% > of the jerks, lids, troublemakers and miscreants who give us a hard > time for running AM, are ex-CB'ers. And as you well know, CB'ers, ex > or other wise (freebanders in particular), disdain the use of AM as > being unworthy of true radio operators.

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-06 Thread Ed Sieb
Don, where do you think I heard this term? And where do you think those slopbucketeers got it? I'd be willing to venture that over 80% of the jerks, lids, troublemakers and miscreants who give us a hard time for running AM, are ex-CB'ers. And as you well know, CB'ers, ex or other wise (fre

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-06 Thread D. Chester
> Hah! If you really want to hear some "ghost-talking" just listen to > 27.025 anytime the band is open!I sometimes think those guys are > yammering, just to hear their own voices. Lot's of calling out, but > no conversation that I can discern! > > Ed, VA3ES "Ghost-talking" eh? Now that's

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-05 Thread fomularace
GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST Hah!  If you really want to hear some "ghost-talking" just listen to 27.025 anytime the band is open!    I sometimes think those guys are yammering, just to hear their own voices.   Lot's of calling out, but no conversat

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-05 Thread Ed Sieb
Hah! If you really want to hear some "ghost-talking" just listen to 27.025 anytime the band is open!I sometimes think those guys are yammering, just to hear their own voices. Lot's of calling out, but no conversation that I can discern! Ed, VA3ES -

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-05 Thread sbjohnston
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:34 pm Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST That's only immediately after the "audio-audio" test. And it's "Howbouddat Skiplan', skiplan', ya gotta copy, c'mawn?". No wait, that's only the CB AM'ers that do that. The C

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-05 Thread Ed Sieb
That's only immediately after the "audio-audio" test. And it's "Howbouddat Skiplan', skiplan', ya gotta copy, c'mawn?". No wait, that's only the CB AM'ers that do that. The CB slawbuckets and freebanders improperly use Q signals. They still use the "audio-audio" test though. Ed, VA3ES

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-05 Thread Bernie Doran
Amateur Service" Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST > Occasionally between the words "audio" you whistle then repeat ad > infinitum. Heard a guy on 3.897 this morning doing just that. Must > have been on the air for 5 mins. He never said any

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-05 Thread fomularace
I though you were supposed to say "Hello Skipland  skipland the motorcity breaki'n and standing buy!" - Original Message - From: "D. Chester" To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2009 1:01:54 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: R

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-05 Thread Jim Wilhite
Occasionally between the words "audio" you whistle then repeat ad infinitum. Heard a guy on 3.897 this morning doing just that. Must have been on the air for 5 mins. He never said anything after he finished. Jim/W5JO - Original Message - > >> We are not doing tests today, only quiz

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-05 Thread D. Chester
>From: "Tom Chesek" We are not doing tests today, only quizzes to prepare for tests. According to what I have monitored on 75m, the way you are supposed to do tests over the air is to (1) connect the crappiest sounding microphone you can find, (2) put your transmitter in SSB mode, (3) turn your

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-04 Thread John Coleman
tnx Tom, Ineeded a chuckle John -Original Message- From: amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tom Chesek Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 1:08 PM To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service Subject: Re: [AMRadio] TEST We are not

Re: [AMRadio] TEST

2009-02-04 Thread Tom Chesek
We are not doing tests today, only quizzes to prepare for tests. - Original Message - From: "John Coleman" To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:05 PM Subject: [AMRadio] TEST > I-net Provider change to an Exhange Server. Does Email

Re: [AMRadio] Test please ignore

2008-06-15 Thread Dave Rothermel
Got it here! Dave Bob Bruno - K2KI wrote: Ok. you didn't ignore this message. So, I will tell you why I am sending it... Past two days I have seen ZERO mails from any of the QTH lists. I finally saw a reply in boatanchors to a topic that I never have seen. Leads me to believe

Re: [AMRadio] Test please ignore

2008-06-15 Thread JT Croteau
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Bob Bruno - K2KI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. you didn't ignore this message. So, I will tell you why I am sending > it... In general. there really hasn't been much activity on the majority of reflectors I subscribe to. Looking at the archives for each list i

RE: [AMRadio] Test, Dayton

2008-05-19 Thread D. Chester
Hay Rick...Everyone seems to be at Dayton or wherever. Really not much traffic... Bob W1PE I just got back from Dayton. This was the first one I had been able to attend since 2003. Attendance was way down, compared to what I remember about 10 years ago. You could actually walk through th

Re: [AMRadio] Test

2008-05-18 Thread Mike WE0H
Let us know if you field test the caps. Also JB Weld should be fine for sealing them back up. Clear RTV would work too. Mike WE0H Rick Brashear wrote: Thanks guys for all the comments on the oil filled capacitors. Looks like I might have everything back on track with my email also. I think

RE: [AMRadio] Test

2008-05-18 Thread Rick Brashear
Thanks guys for all the comments on the oil filled capacitors. Looks like I might have everything back on track with my email also. I think Time Warner had a hiccup. Rick/K5IAR & it's all on topic now!!! LOL!!! Imagine that? Mike WE0H __

Re: [AMRadio] Test

2008-05-18 Thread Mike WE0H
& it's all on topic now!!! LOL!!! Imagine that? Mike WE0H Bob Peters wrote: Hay Rick...Everyone seems to be at Dayton or wherever. Really not much traffic... Bob W1PE __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list S

Re: [AMRadio] Test

2008-05-18 Thread rbethman
There is no excuse! Feeling lonely? Get a dog. Bob - N0DGN Rick Brashear wrote: Please, excuse this test. Thanks, Rick/K5IAR __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-

RE: [AMRadio] Test

2008-05-18 Thread Bob Peters
Hay Rick...Everyone seems to be at Dayton or wherever. Really not much traffic... Bob W1PE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Brashear Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 9:54 AM To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: [AMRadio] Test Please, excuse

Re: [AMRadio] Test - Sri

2008-03-06 Thread rbethman
Is that "supposed" to be Test - Sri Lanka? Duck and run Bob Bruno - K2KI wrote: Getting bounce errors when posting to this list. trying a different outgoing email address. Sorry for the clutter... 73, cul... Bob de k2ki ___

Re: [AMRadio] test

2007-10-12 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
Sara & Wayne Steiner wrote: test ACK -- Driving your AM Rig without a scope, is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV) -- 73 = Best Regards, -Geoff/W5OMR __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio

Re: [AMRadio] test again...

2007-08-04 Thread Mike Sawyer
Mike said: Had to upgrade Thunderbird to 2.xx as the old version tripped the QTH spam software... Oh well, it works again!!! Yea!!! Mike WE0H H, I thought you may have got the same message as I did about a week ago referencing too many bounce messages. If I didn't go to the QTH.com web

Re: [AMRadio] test again...

2007-08-04 Thread WE0H
Had to upgrade Thunderbird to 2.xx as the old version tripped the QTH spam software... Oh well, it works again!!! Yea!!! Mike WE0H Rick Brashear wrote: Message received loud and clear! Rick/K5IAR __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (m

RE: [AMRadio] test again...

2007-08-04 Thread Rick Brashear
Message received loud and clear! Rick/K5IAR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WE0H Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 2:40 PM To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: [AMRadio] test again... testing anti qth spammer bs... Mike WE0H __

Re: [AMRadio] Test message

2007-07-25 Thread Bob Bruhns
I received your message through the reflector. Bacon, WA3WDR - Original Message - From: "Jim Wilhite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This is a test __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List

Re: [AMRadio] Test Message

2007-07-19 Thread WE0H
Static & more static. Dry as a bone up here. Guess we need some controversial subject to liven things up a bit...hi hi... How about we talk about a nice pair of big jugs and not talking tubes...hi hi...That ought'a get the guys going. Mike WE0H Mike Sawyer wrote: Test Message. Since I haven'

Re: [AMRadio] Test Message

2007-07-19 Thread Jim Wilhite
It has been quite Mike and most everywhere. Dog days of summer has descended here and I am having to cut dead trees before winter. Static has been horrible for a long time. We had a month of rain in this part of the country which precluded operating the radio too. Jim/W5JO Test Message.

Re: [AMRadio] Test Message

2007-07-19 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
Mike Sawyer wrote: Test Message. Since I haven't seen anything posted in a while. it's still working. Just folks have gone quiet. Last -flurry- I saw around here, was Jim's request for the schematic/book on the FCC 90A calibrator, and the R-388 rx discussion. -- 73 = Best Regards, -Geoff/W

Re: [AMRadio] test

2007-06-27 Thread WE0H
Yep, we are hearing you just fine...hi hi... Mike WE0H ww1hh wrote: No messages in the last 2 day's. Is this working? __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net

Re: [AMRadio] test

2007-06-27 Thread Jim Wilhite
In my part of the country all the rain may be slowing things down. Subject: [AMRadio] test No messages in the last 2 day's. Is this working? __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List

Re: [AMRadio] test

2007-01-04 Thread Gary Schafer
x27;t know how to do it otherwise. 73 Gary K4FMX _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Wilhite Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:21 PM To: Discussion of AM Radio Subject: Re: [AMRadio] test Blood test, drug test, breathing test or drivi

Re: [AMRadio] test

2007-01-04 Thread Jim Wilhite
Blood test, drug test, breathing test or driving test? Hi Gary: Jim W5JO From: Gary Schafer Test ___ Amradio mailing list List Home: http://w5ami.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio_w5ami.net Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Post: mailto:A

Re: [AMRadio] test

2007-01-04 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ___ > Amradio mailing list > List Home: http://w5ami.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio_w5ami.net > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > Post: mailto:Amradio@w5ami.net received 5-9 here. -- 73, etc... _

Re: [AMRadio] Test

2006-12-24 Thread John Lawson
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006, Joe Walden wrote: Test Continuity? Emission? Transconductance...? Cheers and Best of the Season! John KB6SCO DM09fg __ AMRadio mailing list List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Par

Re: [AMRadio] Test message

2005-12-27 Thread kenw2dtc
Made it. 73, Ken W2DTC __ Ken Barber Middletown, NJ Radio Website: http://w2dtc.com Family Photos: http://kenw2dtc.home.comcast.net __ - Original Message - From: "Donald Chester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent

Re: [AMRadio] test message - disregard

2005-12-05 Thread W5OMR/Geoff
Brian K Harris wrote: Brian K. Harris, WA5UEK Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Looks good, Brian. Good to hear from you. Hope to hear you on the air, soon. --- 73 = Best Regards, -Geoff/W5OMR

Re: [AMRadio] Test

2005-09-26 Thread W5OMR/Geoff
ack Todd, KA1KAQ wrote: Sorry for the test message, but my last reply to the list bounced back saying I was blocked for SPAM. Not sure why, but looking into it. ~ Todd/'Boomer' KA1KAQ

Re: [AMRadio] test

2005-07-07 Thread Anthony W. DePrato
At 05:12 PM 7/7/2005 -0700, you wrote: Does that mean you are in a coal mine? well not really for hf i am in a fairly good area. but for VHF it sucks.. i am really in a black hole or better a black V. if you will look at the maps over the years all VHF signals from EU most of the time go down t

Re: [AMRadio] test

2005-07-07 Thread Geoff
Bob Macklin wrote: Does that mean you are in a coal mine? I am in a valley that runs N/S. On 80M I only have a N/S path. Alaska & California. and I'm in South Central Texas, where I hear the West Coast, and the East coast, when they dont hear each other, and I'm left with no "windowed" A

Re: [AMRadio] test

2005-07-07 Thread Bob Macklin
Does that mean you are in a coal mine? I am in a valley that runs N/S. On 80M I only have a N/S path. Alaska & California. Bob Macklin K5MYJ/7 Seattle, Wa. "REAL RADIOS GLOW IN THE DARK" - Original Message - From: "Anthony W. DePrato WA4JQS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, Jul

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread k0ng
Discussion of AM Radio" > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:29 AM > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Test? > > > > Seems it has been quiet here. > > > > Are there any PNW AMers on this list? > > > > Bob Macklin > > K5MYJ/7 > > Seattle, Wa. > >

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread k0ng
Not if you are nice to them !! 73 DE K0NG .. Quoting Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Bob Macklin wrote: > > >Bob Macklin > >K5MYJ/7 > >Seattle, Wa. > > > >"REAL RADIOS GLOW IN THE DARK" > > > > > > > > They bite, too. > > 73 = Best Regards, > -Geoff/W5OMR > > > > _

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread Bob Macklin
Pacific NorthWest. Ie, Puget Sound/Seattle,Tacoma etc! Bob Macklin K5MYJ/7 Kent, Wa. "REAL RADIOS GLOW IN THE DARK" - Original Message - From: "David Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio" Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:32 PM

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread David Jones
Thanks. I guess I am UMW - upper midwest > David Jones wrote: > > >PNW? > > > > > >> <>Seems it has been quiet here. > >> > >> Are there any PNW AMers on this list? > > > > Pacific North West. > > 73 = Best Regards, > -Geoff/W5OMR > > > ___

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread Geoff
David Jones wrote: PNW? <>Seems it has been quiet here. Are there any PNW AMers on this list? Pacific North West. 73 = Best Regards, -Geoff/W5OMR

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread David Jones
PNW? > Seems it has been quiet here. > > Are there any PNW AMers on this list?

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread Bob Macklin
gt; To: "Discussion of AM Radio" Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:41 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Test? > At least one. > > Clay W7CE > Lacey, WA > > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Macklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Discussion

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread Clay Curtiss W7CE
At least one. Clay W7CE Lacey, WA - Original Message - From: "Bob Macklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio" Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Test? > Seems it has been quiet here. > > Are there a

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread Bob Macklin
Seems it has been quiet here. Are there any PNW AMers on this list? Bob Macklin K5MYJ/7 Seattle, Wa. "REAL RADIOS GLOW IN THE DARK" - Original Message - From: "Geoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio" Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005

Re: [AMRadio] Test?

2005-07-06 Thread Geoff
Bob Macklin wrote: Bob Macklin K5MYJ/7 Seattle, Wa. "REAL RADIOS GLOW IN THE DARK" They bite, too. 73 = Best Regards, -Geoff/W5OMR

Re: [AMRadio] test

2005-04-29 Thread Barry Sherwood
Good testrst 5/9 _._ Barry Sherwood KF5GC Ex-N5GZX __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 29 22:43:38 2005 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
> The Harbor freight meter can be had on sale for $19.95. I have one and > it is ok. The other functions, capacitor, frequency etc. are almost > useless though. The sensitivity and range for those functions are poor. > But for a general dvm it is not bad. They do have a cheap one that they >

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread Jim Wilhite
ginal Message - From: "Edward B Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation > I think you guys are getting carried away with technicalities. We are not > space laboratories, we are ama

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread Gary Schafer
ice. Jim WB2FCN - Original Message - From: "Merz Donald S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio" Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:21 AM Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation Really? Is this the best recommendation that we can come

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread Edward B Richards
meter with high impedance. They are not > terribly > expensive and can provide both digital and analog readings. > > 73 Jim > de W5JO > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Merz Donald S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Discussion of AM Radio" >

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread Edward B Richards
PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward B > Richards > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 11:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; amradio@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation > > > Bill; > > Go to that auction place and buy a

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread Jim Wilhite
ROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio" Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 9:21 AM Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation > Really? Is this the best recommendation that we can come up with? Every one of these that I see is awfully beat up after 30-50 years. And these were not esp

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread James M. Walker
- Original Message - From: "Merz Donald S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio" Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:21 AM Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation Really? Is this the best recommendation that we can come up with? Every one of t

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread Rbethman
There ARE other options. I found a surplus TS-505D/U VTVM. Works perfectly. The HP-410 series show up at fests. They aren't expensive either. Bob - N0DGN Merz Donald S wrote: Really? Is this the best recommendation that we can come up with? Every one of these that I see is awfully beat up

RE: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread Merz Donald S
, 2004 11:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation Bill; Go to that auction place and buy a Heathkit VTVM. There are usually a lot of them listed. All are 11 megohm input impedance. Then buy an RF probe. The later VTVM's hav

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment Recommendation

2004-08-24 Thread Edward B Richards
Bill; Go to that auction place and buy a Heathkit VTVM. There are usually a lot of them listed. All are 11 megohm input impedance. Then buy an RF probe. The later VTVM's have a phone jack input and so do most RF probes. Also known a demodulator or scope demodulator. Good luck 73, Ed Richards K6UU

Re: [AMRadio] Test Equipment for Sale

2004-07-26 Thread kc7hkp
04 07:51:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from allegheneroy7l (dialup-0047.floodcity.net [198.93.211.47]) by mail.floodcity.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 613E85CD2BC for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:50:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "David Knepper" <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [AMRadio] test

2004-06-10 Thread Jim Wilhite
Hi Mike: Well not quite. Have a DX 100 up and running right now. Am waiting for some shelves to arrive before I complete the installation. The tower has yet to be put up for permanent antennas on 75 meters/40 meters, but that will come soon. I am waiting for the guy who built the house to come

RE: [AMRadio] test

2004-06-10 Thread Mike Wells
Hello Jim Are you all set up at your new QTH and have that Globe King running yet? Mike W0FD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Wilhite Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 11:44 AM To: AM Radio Discussion List Subject: [AMRadio] test This is a

Re: [AMRadio] test

2004-06-10 Thread Geoff
Same here - working with a different mail program. 73 = Best Regards, -Geoff/W5OMR Jim Wilhite wrote: This is a test to see if I can post. 73 Jim de W5JO ___ AMRadio mailing list AMRadio@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amrad