[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-10-03 Thread Jeff Yanko
: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE We are missing the easy answer. He had diplexer that was off spec. It happens. 73, Joe kk0sd -Original Message- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Yanko Sent

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-10-02 Thread Jeff Yanko
, October 01, 2009 6:27 PM Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE Jeff, The test was conducted with an anritsu two port network analyzer. Model number can be obtained if required. Each curve was made feeding the common port on the BNC cable as shipped

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-10-02 Thread Jeff Yanko
if it is possible to extend the timer by 1 or 1.5 minutes, if the bird can spare it. 73, Jeff WB3JFS - Original Message - From: Alan VE4YZ ve...@mts.net To: 'AMSAT-BB' amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:44 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-10-02 Thread Gary Joe Mayfield
; Gary Joe Mayfield Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE Hi Charles and the group, FB on the numbers. Interesting to say the least and thanks for taking the time to look further into this topic. Questions? I have a few after looking at these numbers

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-10-01 Thread Jeff Yanko
- From: Charles Suprin To: Jeff Yanko Cc: Joe ; Gary Joe Mayfield ; AMSAT-BB Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE Howdy Jeff, Someone asked and here we go. A file attachment follows. Actually

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-10-01 Thread Charles Suprin
individually to give an accurate number for each. 73, Jeff WB3JFS - Original Message - From: Joe n...@mwt.net To: Gary Joe Mayfield gary_mayfi...@hotmail.com Cc: 'AMSAT-BB' amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 6:42 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-10-01 Thread Charles Suprin
*Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:09 PM *Subject:* Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE Howdy Jeff, Someone asked and here we go. A file attachment follows. Actually the diplexer looks pretty good. Less than half a db of loss at VHF

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-09-26 Thread Jeff Yanko
- Original Message - From: Joe n...@mwt.net To: Gary Joe Mayfield gary_mayfi...@hotmail.com Cc: 'AMSAT-BB' amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 6:42 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE as in the texts below, there is something else going

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-09-26 Thread Mike Ryan
to endure! Mike WB1AAT -Original Message- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Joe Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 6:43 PM To: Gary Joe Mayfield Cc: 'AMSAT-BB' Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-09-26 Thread Jeff Yanko
Hi Bruce and all, No problem. Actually, I wouldn't call it research as much as curiosity. Maybe the research will come later when developing something better. :) I know the antenna works but can it be made to perform better? The antenna itself is of great quality and workmanship, it's the

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-09-26 Thread Edward Cole
To: Gary Joe Mayfield gary_mayfi...@hotmail.com Cc: 'AMSAT-BB' amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 6:42 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE as in the texts below, there is something else going on here. That Diplexor can not be all that bad

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-09-25 Thread Bruce Robertson
Jeff -- I really appreciate you doing this research for us. Two additional ideas come to mind: 1. Those of us with FT-817s could configure its two RF ports to use different bands and connect the rig directly to the beam's antenna connectors, bypassing the duplexer. For this purpose,

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-09-25 Thread James Duffey
On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:53 AM, Bruce Robertson wrote: 2. If I'm correct, your replacement duplexer is rather larger than the one it is replacing. It would be a great topic for a Journal article if someone with the necessary equipment and expertise were to design a replacement with less loss.

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-09-25 Thread i8cvs
- Original Message - From: Bruce Robertson ve9...@gmail.com To: Jeff Yanko wb3...@cox.net Cc: AMSAT-BB amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:53 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE Jeff -- snip 2. If I'm correct, your replacement

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-09-25 Thread Joe
as in the texts below, there is something else going on here. That Diplexor can not be all that bad. two reasons. How many db down is the front to side of that antenna? and I can not imaging someone would sell a diplexor that has greater than 20 db of losses. because of the statement that

[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration results - UPDATE

2009-09-25 Thread Art McBride
will tell the condition of the diplexer. Art, KC6UQH -Original Message- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Joe Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 6:43 PM To: Gary Joe Mayfield Cc: 'AMSAT-BB' Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow antenna reconfiguration