Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
In fact the bug happens quite often on Mac...but I found the source of the problem. On mac, aMSN is a package, a double-click app. You can put it anywhere you want, in a folder, in /applications, etc. You can do that with every applications on OS X, you are not forced to /usr/ local/bin or

Re: [Amsn-devel] Screenshots

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
oh, yeah, forgot that, thanx KKRT On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:10:39 -0500, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Added to wiki Le 05-12-10 à 14:39, Youness Alaoui a écrit : Hi everyone, I've been looking at the plugins screenshots (maybe the same would apply for skins) and I find s

Re: [Amsn-devel] Screenshots

2005-12-10 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
Added to wiki Le 05-12-10 à 14:39, Youness Alaoui a écrit : Hi everyone, I've been looking at the plugins screenshots (maybe the same would apply for skins) and I find some inconsistencies that I don't like and I suggest we redo all the screenshots... : 1 - screenshots should be taken from

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
but the big is that 'null' image bug... I hope we didn't re-re-re-introduced that bug... KKRT On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:04:49 -0500, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The guy probably trashed his loading.gif picture Le 05-12-10 à 14:20, Youness Alaoui a écrit : http://amsn.sou

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
The guy probably trashed his loading.gif picture Le 05-12-10 à 14:20, Youness Alaoui a écrit : http://amsn.sourceforge.net/bugs/admin/index.php?bug=1509# is that normal ??? today's CVS! :S KKRT On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:12:13 -0500, Le Philousophe - Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hum, I wa

[Amsn-devel] Screenshots

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
Hi everyone, I've been looking at the plugins screenshots (maybe the same would apply for skins) and I find some inconsistencies that I don't like and I suggest we redo all the screenshots... : 1 - screenshots should be taken from windows, not linux (unless the plugin works for linux only),

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
http://amsn.sourceforge.net/bugs/admin/index.php?bug=1509# is that normal ??? today's CVS! :S KKRT On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:12:13 -0500, Le Philousophe - Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hum, I wasn't clean about the 0.95-1 thing :p I said that to put a mess !! :p In fact this -1 thing is the

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
ok, cool, that's better... is it normal thogh that the description of amsn in the rpm is in french ??? or maybe there are several descriptions and it showed french for you because that's what you chose ? I'd prefer we keep the same english description in all the packages... KaKaRoTo On Sat,

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
Thank you Harry for your insight :) That's exactly what I though also and that's what we've been doing so far... KKRT. On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:01:49 -0500, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Okay you and Jerome decide, but I'll explain package version and release numbering conventio

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Le Philousophe - Phil
Hum, I wasn't clean about the 0.95-1 thing :p I said that to put a mess !! :p In fact this -1 thing is the release number so if we create a new package from the same version (but with some modifs like a new skin or things like that...) we increment it. In fact, this number is distribution specifi

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Harry Vennik
Okay you and Jerome decide, but I'll explain package version and release numbering conventions 0.95 is the version number of the release 0.95-1 is the first package of that release 0.95-2 is a second package with the same release, but with a fix for the way the package is built 0.95.1 would be

Re: [Amsn-devel] Fwd: [Amsn-commits] msn msncam.tcl,1.127,1.128

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
ahh ok, sorry, I didn't notice the -strict... but still, the 0:0:0:0 will make you set all your settings to 0 and you'll get a black image... leave it as it was for the ":::".. please... what was you hanging problem ? KKRT On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:34:47 -0500, Le Philousophe - Phil <[EMAIL P

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
NOOO toi meme!!! :P I'm sorry, but I don't want to release a 0.95.1 release without release 0.95! and I don't want to release both at the same time... we're not confusing ANYBODY, and we're not fucking anything, we can't make a NEW release if there w

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
You wanted to change 0.95 because of the problem with the reflector so if you want to make a new release...fix that!Le 05-12-10 à 13:48, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer a écrit :the pakcages will be created in time once these two issues are finished (I get approval of everyone saying "yes, I think we're stable

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
aie aie aieee we're totally misunderstanding each other now ok, first, Jerome, when you were talking about a 0.95-1 tag in CVS, you were talking about a 0.95.1 release ? I though it would only be a tag in CVS that's all (maybe I can remove the old tag and create a new one w

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
N0.95 is done we said it.0.95.1 is the next release.We tag a NEW release. This is to be sure we don't confuse packages. Le 05-12-10 à 13:46, Youness Alaoui a écrit :no, look, 0.95 will be out, the CVS tag 0.95 isn't the final one, I will retag a 0

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
Le 05-12-10 à 13:39, Le Philousophe - Phil a écrit : I think you can remove the tag :p And we won't remove it, 0.95 tag is done. You decide to release it or you go to 0.95.1 Would be too confusing to know if a package is built with 0.95 or the "next 0.95" , we won't start that. Correction

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
no, look, 0.95 will be out, the CVS tag 0.95 isn't the final one, I will retag a 0.95 and we'll create a new "0.95" release since this one is hidden from everyone... now the thing is, one we create the packages, we're still not going to release!!! because we'll be waiting for the website... n

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Le Philousophe - Phil
I think you can remove the tag :p Correction 0.95-1 exists it's the first release for linux packages !!! It's the 0.95-2 which doesn't exists : cat configure.ac | head -n10 APPNAME=amsn APPVERSION=0.95 APPRELEASE=1 < You see : it's the release 1 not the 0 one Phil Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
0.95 exist, the tag is there 0.95.1 doesn't exist yet. We don't have to silitently drop the old one, we just have to release the 0.95.1 first, that's all. As long as we decide fast to release or not releasing it.. Le 05-12-10 à 13:06, Le Philousophe - Phil a écrit : Does 0.95 exists ?? We

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Lee Olson
Nope, never heard of it... The website doesn't say 0.95 exists... so I don't think it does ;-) We were testing to make sure it was ready for release, and we noticed it had a few issues, so we will fix those and release 0.95. ~Lee On 12/10/05, Le Philousophe - Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Le Philousophe - Phil
Does 0.95 exists ?? We are only a dozen to know about it !! We can silently drop the old one and redo a new package :p It's my opinion and I know it's dirty but it can hide the trouble and we are able to do a perfect release !! Phil Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 19:01, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer a écrit :

Re: release status ? WAS: [Amsn-devel] Webcam report

2005-12-10 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
Youness, I read your message and I have no idea if you are talking about 0.95 or a possible 0.95-1!Le 05-12-10 à 02:38, Youness Alaoui a écrit :1- website 2- stability 3- languages 4- packages so what's the status of the website, is there a list of things to be done before we can quality it of bei

Re: [Amsn-devel] Fwd: [Amsn-commits] msn msncam.tcl,1.127,1.128

2005-12-10 Thread Le Philousophe - Phil
Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 18:31, Youness Alaoui a écrit : > no, > not like that, > not default is "0:0:0:0", yes, we WILL have no bugs, but first time users > will get a full black image becauase all settings are at 0 Right for that I added 0:0:0:0 because for me it mad

[Amsn-devel] Fwd: [Amsn-commits] msn msncam.tcl,1.127,1.128

2005-12-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
no, not like that, not default is "0:0:0:0", yes, we WILL have no bugs, but first time users will get a full black image becauase all settings are at 0 also, it's not a safe fix because we still can have the [string is integer ""] == 1 issue, so it must be checked f

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.95 taged and released

2005-12-10 Thread Arieh Schneier
Sorry, I only have like 1 minute now - I'm going away for 2 days tomorrow so wanted to send this message. I've been really busy so haven't had time to test the win install properly, but I did install and run it and it worked. The program to add to the start of windows also worked - it was a bit od

[Amsn-devel] Re: [Amsn-lang] Bad encoding in langes

2005-12-10 Thread Thomas Geirhovd
The LANG-HOWTO contains nothing about encoding... It should be updated to tell translators to keep the old encoding. On 12/9/05, Alvaro J. Iradier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, I don't know who last sent langes file. The encoding was wrong, it

[Amsn-devel] Re: [Amsn-lang] [URGENT] LANGFILES REMOVED FROM AMSN

2005-12-10 Thread Harry Vennik
Op vrijdag 9 december 2005 08:10, schreef Youness Alaoui: > Can we also please get a REAL updated list of lang files with translated   > keys percentage... that translation page from the website doesn't look so   > good (a lot of 772 missing keys for a lot of lang files...) so which list   > is up

[Amsn-devel] Re: [Amsn-lang] [URGENT] LANGFILES REMOVED FROM AMSN

2005-12-10 Thread Harry Vennik
Op vrijdag 9 december 2005 08:10, schreef Youness Alaoui: > Hello, > Thank you Todor for your hard work, and I take this opportunity to also > thank everyone who helped with the translations, so Thanks to you all! > Can the language maintainer please add back this file to CVS ? and I'll > follow th