"Brian Clifton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to sound negative about Analog - its great as a general
guide to what going on. But surely if you want detailed analysis for
Marketers you need a more detailed(?) product i.e. WebTrends??
This has to be the funniest thing I've read all
hi everyone,
can this be viewed thru analog's output ? i.e., stats stating the number of
unique visitors (or IP adds) fro the day, week and month.
tia,
chad
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe
can this be viewed thru analog's output ? i.e., stats stating the
number of unique visitors (or IP adds) fro the day, week and month.
unique visitors are a figment of a marketer's imagination. No way a Web
server can tell you that. "why Log stats are completely useless (or worse)"
explains
Walter,
unique visitors are a figment of a marketer's imagination. No way a Web
server can tell you that. "why Log stats are completely useless (or worse)"
explains it nicely. It's linked at in Analog's docs, if I remember well.
A report on where (some of the) visitors coem from is in the HOST
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 12:05:08PM +0200, Walter Vannini wrote:
Hi Christian,
True, but the trouble is that some of us work in intense colaboration
with marketers, and have daily demands for the number of visits,
true. I do.
i do also. in analog's "General Summary" theres a table
Hi Chad,
True, but the trouble is that some of us work in intense colaboration
with marketers, and have daily demands for the number of visits,
true. I do.
i do also. in analog's "General Summary" theres a table saying "Distinct Hosts
Served" ... but thats only for the entire span of
i do also. in analog's "General Summary" theres a table saying
"Distinct Hosts Served" ... but thats only for the entire span of
time covered by the logs. is there any way for us to determine the
number of disticnt hosts served on a daily, weekly and monthly basis ?
KISS, right?
I don't want to sound negative about Analog - its great as a general
guide to what going on. But surely if you want detailed analysis for
Marketers you need a more detailed(?) product i.e. WebTrends??
Brian
Hi Chad,
True, but the trouble is that some of us work in intense colaboration
Brian,
I don't want to sound negative about Analog - its great as a general
guide to what going on. But surely if you want detailed analysis for
Marketers you need a more detailed(?) product i.e. WebTrends??
That's what I was considering a few mails back, but I'm not quite
sure about the
Well here's my tuppence worth;
I don't think that you can say that WebTrends is 'much more detailed' than
Analog. I do think you can say that WebTrends is vastly more 'creative' than
Analog. The reasons for this are beautifully outlined in the 'what you can
and can't do' section of the Analog
Brian Clifton wrote:
I have not done a direct comparision, but I am pretty sure as far as bare
facts go they would be the same. If you have an example where WT has
produced pure twoddle, please post.
There was a post re: this matter two weeks agon when W*bTr*ends came up on the
list. Check
There was a post re: this matter two weeks agon when W*bTr*ends came up on
the list. Check the archives around May 10th for Jim Sander's strong
dismissal of the product's claimed reliability.
I will have a read of this.
Report Magic will provide you all the fancy reports, graphs, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
